- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 9,249
- Reaction score
- 12,515
I would also like headbutts. It ain't a real fight without a couple.
Only if we can retroactively take points for every blatant foul.
Any strike can break anything. The 12-6 leading to TKOs is better than a good fight being stopped on a cut.Don’t like the 12-6 proposed change. Unnecessary. Fighters are already doing good enough with the 9-6 sweeping strikes. 12-6 could destroy the orbital bone.
No12-6 is a crushing action which would eventually crush the skull, no?
Thats a fucking misleading title
It is NOT allowing knees to grounded opponents.
11:55 - 6:05 = fineDon’t like the 12-6 proposed change. Unnecessary. Fighters are already doing good enough with the 9-6 sweeping strikes. 12-6 could destroy the orbital bone.
All 4 sentences.lol this is the only guy who seems to have actually read the document.
It’s 30 years ago. Not year. Plural.11:55 - 6:05 = fine
12-6 = fucking broken skulls and shit
Source: guy who saw a dude break cinder blocks that were pre cracked at a karate demonstration 30 year ago.
Allow all strikes to the head all the time.Good change but still doesn't go far enough. There should be no limits to knees in any position.
We didn't all know that?Oh, so I'm not the only that actually read the thing. There's 2 of us.
With this change, fighters can still pull a Sterling there and beg on their knees.
How do you know it's a broken orbital bone and not just a welt?Don’t like the 12-6 proposed change. Unnecessary. Fighters are already doing good enough with the 9-6 sweeping strikes. 12-6 could destroy the orbital bone.