International Britain introduces new legislation ensuring ‘ethnic and cultural minorities’ aren't jailed for crimes

[Koro_11]

I have been yellow carded for my interaction with said user, and I believe another user was banned for making a thread welcoming them back.

I'm a bit confused, though - when sent a copy of the forum rules alongside my yellow card, it very clearly states that only one account is allowed.

I can't say I'm all that surprised, he seems like the type to instigate, then run and snitch when the person retaliates.

Still, as you said I'm not happy to hear that anyone's that "unwell", I hope he gets the therapy he needs.

 

[lowlife]

@Tatra come on bro make me laugh, I'm waiting.

 

[Siver!]

I can't say I'm all that surprised, he seems like the type to instigate, then run and snitch when the person retaliates.

Still, as you said I'm not happy to hear that anyone's that "unwell", I hope he gets the therapy he needs.

Hall monitors everywhere lmao

You cant even take time out from this place for very valid reasons without people being upset about it.

Guys, I am SO SORRY I deprived you of my Internet rambling... but you survived!!!

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

So you care enough to try and attempt to debunk it, but when its clear as day that it is happening you have nothing to say ?

Hypocrisy at its finest. Typical commie behavior.

i didn't attempt to do anything lmao it was immediately debunked whether i care about this topic or not. i just like coming in here and seeing you "won't they think about the white people???" guys get first-replied into oblivion every single time.

 

[Koro_11]

You cant even take time out from this place for very valid reasons without people being upset about it.

Yeah, and your valid reason was that Trump got elected. Hilarious.

 

[Tatra]

You still haven't responded to this...

Yes...it's a thing

UK justice secretary to over-rule new sentencing advice over ‘double standards’

Shabana Mahmood will recommend reversing guidelines that appear to favour offenders from ethnic minorities

www.ft.com

Shabana Mahmood rejects sentencing changes after 'two-tier' claims

Proposed reforms issued by the independent Sentencing Council were labelled biased by the Conservatives.

www.bbc.com

@Siver! whenever you're ready...

 

[Siver!]

Yeah, and your valid reason was that Trump got elected. Hilarious.

Not so much.

But seriously, I honestly wouldn't notice if any one of you guys disappeared, for any length of time, for any reason, unless it was super obvious: like that Mon guy who I guess also up and left when nobody died from the vaxx like he wanted.

He was different even by Sherdog standards.

The rest of you I kind of like, but not enough to miss ya.

 

[Tatra]

Not so much.

But seriously, I honestly wouldn't notice if any one of you guys disappeared, for any length of time, for any reason, unless it was super obvious: like that Mon guy who I guess also up and left when nobody died from the vaxx like he wanted.

He was different even by Sherdog standards.

The rest of you I kind of like, but not enough to miss ya.

... whenever you're ready...

 

[Siver!]

... whenever you're ready...

What's wrong with you?

This is forum is weird, man.

 

[Tatra]

What's wrong with you?

This is forum is weird, man.

What are you having trouble with? You're being proven wrong and you find that "weird"? What is wrong with you?

 

[Siver!]

What are you having trouble with? You're being proven wrong and you find that "weird"? What is wrong with you?

About what?

Who has proven what, and what's it got to do with you and me?

 

[Tatra]

About what?

Who has proven what, and what's it got to do with you and me?

Is playing dumb really all you have left now?

You've been proven wrong here:

 

[Siver!]

Is playing dumb really all you have left now?

You've been proven wrong here:

Which one of my many posts in this thread do you want me to repeat, and why?

Clickbait.

---

Justice Secretary calls for sentencing guideline to be reversed over ethnicity

The Sentencing Council published new principles for judges to follow when imposing community and custodial sentences on Wednesday.

uk.news.yahoo.com

---


Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, replied: “As somebody from an ethnic minority background, I do not stand for any differential treatment before the law for anyone.

“There will never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch or under this Labour Government.”

She later said she will be writing to the Sentencing Council to “register my displeasure” and “recommend reversing this change to the guidance”.

Ms Mahmood added: “The Sentencing Council is entirely independent.

“These guidelines do not represent my views or the views of this Government.”

---

It's not going to happen.

[/thread]

Elected officials didn't propose it and it's not legislation. It certainly hadn't been introduced.

And the fact it's not happening is just the pickle on top of this nothing burger.

It wasn't proposed by this government any more than the previous one.

See below:

"The previous government was also consulted on the change during the consultation period between November 2023 to February 2024."

They also didn't pick up on the insanity of a two tier justice system, but are pretending this nothing burger - that was shot down as soon as it was challenged - is some scheme devised entirely by Labour.

Which is really, really silly.

I'll say it again: it's been dealt with, it's a nothing burger.

Struggling with the definition of legislation? Struggling with the definition of independent guidelines? Struggling with the fact it's already getting struck down? Struggling with the fact two successive governments failed to pick it up, but the second it was picked up, the guidelines were shot down by all sides?

What's still left to discuss?

Why don't we just use actual real information instead of pretending "legislation" has been "introduced"?

It's not hard to just use accurate information.

All you have to be able to do is read and write.

Or copy and paste, even

They're not in the government, they're independent.

If the poster had been honest in the first place, we could have had a serious discussion about the influence of (often hereditary) peers in Britain.

But here we are wasting our time on a dishonest discussion, and any attempt to bring some honesty is misunderstood (often intentionally).

This kind of lame engagement farming and attention seeking sucks ass, man.

 

[Tatra]

Which one of my many posts in this thread do you want me to repeat, and why?

So you're unable to prove the facts presented wrong. That's what I thought.

 

[Siver!]

So you're unable to prove the facts presented wrong. That's what I thought.

I have done so. But *sigh* if we have to play this silly little game, I suppose that's why we're all here.

Go on then.

What "fact" was presented that I can't disprove or counter?

 

[Tatra]

I have done so. But *sigh* if we have to play this silly little game, I suppose that's why we're all here.

Go on then.

What "fact" was presented that I can't disprove or counter?

You haven't done anything. Which you are, of course, fully aware of.

 

[Siver!]

You haven't done anything. Which you are, of course, fully aware of.

No, no, you're not getting out of it that easily.

You've just brought me back to the thread demanding answers.

What's your question, pinhead? What am I supposed to be proving/disproving that you feel I haven't already spoken about? Because I can guarantee your lazy backside that I've already discussed it - unless you've spotted something I haven't.

But playing the cryptic questionmaster at this stage of the thread is retarded. What's your question? What do you think is a fact?

 

[Tatra]

No, no, you're not getting out of it that easily.

You've just brought me back to the thread demanding answers.

What's your question, pinhead? What am I supposed to be proving/disproving that you feel I haven't already spoken about? Because I can guarantee your lazy backside that I've already discussed it - unless you've spotted something I haven't.

But playing the cryptic questionmaster at this stage of the thread is retarded. What's your question? What do you think is a fact?

Still playing dumb, I see. I've just remembered you were on my ignore list with your old account. Back you go...

 

[Siver!]

Still playing dumb, I see. I've just remembered you were on my ignore list with your old account. Back you go...

Thank God for that.

You don't even know what it is you're trying to ask me. Why even bother posting?

 

[UberHere]

What's left to discuss is your dishonest dicktucking, new account, same lame name, and same lame dishonest arguments.

Someone proposed that nonsense, so even if it was struck down, the person who proposed that garbage should not be in a position of government, that's what I'm discussing.

If some idiot came up with the idea that we should be more lenient when white people commit crimes you and others like you would be all over it calling for that person to be lynched.

At least have enough honesty and integrity to be consistent and call out the blatant racism regardless of the group it's directed towards.

He won’t. He’s one of those ultra progressive, self hating mental cases. He can’t even manage his own internet usage.