- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 35,800
- Reaction score
- 33,264
Your phone auto-corrected to "difinitiviely"?
Do you understand how auto-correct works?
I think an umbrella term that allows for all possibilities (including the most likely-- criminal as they may be) is more appropriate than misguided speculative specificity.
Lol at the trump cucks constantly moving the goalposts. Now collusion is ok, you guys are jokes
"It's obamas fault"
Oh wait that doesn't work
"It's the deep state"
Oh wait that doesn't work
"It's Comeys fault"
"It's Hillary"
"It's the media"
What law was broken?Lol at the trump cucks constantly moving the goalposts. Now collusion is ok, you guys are jokes
I didn't incredible stupid, easily manipulated people didWhy did you vote him in?
You're just gonna go down with the ship aren't yah dummyWhat law was broken?
You're just gonna go down with the ship aren't yah dummy
Lol at the trump cucks constantly moving the goalposts. Now collusion is ok, you guys are jokes
You are torturing me.I haven't even stated a position. Answer the question or there is no point in us conversating
Good god you guys are stupid, his camp is corruption personifiedSo you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?
And you don't believe two consenting adults have the right to exercise free speech?
Good god you guys are stupid, his camp is corruption personified
So you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?
And you don't believe two consenting adults have the right to exercise free speech?
Intradesting.
You keep avoiding my original question to you. Instead you nitpick my choice of words and spelling. Have a goodnight Mick, you're not worth talking to tonightYou are torturing me.
Because the trial isn't held here, and I'm not the one bringing charges. That's why I'm citing examples of activities (that "collusion" suffices to describe) which are examples of criminal conduct. I wasn't the one who alleged that collusion isn't a crime.But we're talking about potential laws being broken. If you can't be specific as to which criminal laws are being broken - for fear of being wrong - then what does that say about this entire spectacle?
Are you alleging that this is the full extent of the activities in the meeting? How did you arrive at this awareness?So you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?