BREAKING: Donald Trump Jr.’s Russia emails shake the presidency ***UPDATE: Gowdy Excoriates Trump***

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your phone auto-corrected to "difinitiviely"?

Do you understand how auto-correct works?

It works when it wants to. I've stopped trying to figure it out. Now about my question... what do you think? Again I'm not trying to have passive aggressive discourse with you.
 
I think an umbrella term that allows for all possibilities (including the most likely-- criminal as they may be) is more appropriate than misguided speculative specificity.

But we're talking about potential laws being broken. If you can't be specific as to which criminal laws are being broken - for fear of being wrong - then what does that say about this entire spectacle?
 
"It's obamas fault"

Oh wait that doesn't work

"It's the deep state"

Oh wait that doesn't work

"It's Comeys fault"
"It's Hillary"
"It's the media"
 
Lol at the trump cucks constantly moving the goalposts. Now collusion is ok, you guys are jokes
 
Im honestly too busy with work and being a lazy turd to follow along with this. So is all that went on is trumps people tried to get dirt on hilary via the russians?

I dont even like trump at all but lol good fuck her
 
Lol at the trump cucks constantly moving the goalposts. Now collusion is ok, you guys are jokes

So you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?

And you don't believe two consenting adults have the right to exercise free speech?

Intradesting.
 
So you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?

And you don't believe two consenting adults have the right to exercise free speech?
Good god you guys are stupid, his camp is corruption personified
 
Good god you guys are stupid, his camp is corruption personified

So just to be consistent with your views on Hillarys case you also dont believe Trumps corruption should be discussed right?

Just looking for some consistency here, you nincompoop.
 
So you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?

And you don't believe two consenting adults have the right to exercise free speech?

Intradesting.


Dude, context.

You set up this question with zero context, just transactions.

Is that a fuckin' Straw Man?


I don't know because I don't know shit about that stuff, but even so, it seems a lot like a fuckin' straw man.
 
But we're talking about potential laws being broken. If you can't be specific as to which criminal laws are being broken - for fear of being wrong - then what does that say about this entire spectacle?
Because the trial isn't held here, and I'm not the one bringing charges. That's why I'm citing examples of activities (that "collusion" suffices to describe) which are examples of criminal conduct. I wasn't the one who alleged that collusion isn't a crime.
So you don't believe Americans should be open to receiving information that highlights potential political corruption?
Are you alleging that this is the full extent of the activities in the meeting? How did you arrive at this awareness?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,083
Messages
57,967,468
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair
Back
Top