- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 61,991
- Reaction score
- 16,744
Crazy. Ppl should be watching
You do miss out before that scene with the giant hologram the film cuts to the big advert for her following the surrogate seduction very heavily suggesting her nature after which her role in the film clearly diminishes.
Again though I viewed this as a really clumsy piece of writing. Prior to that I think the K/Joi scenes had actually been the strongest sections of the film building up a nice degree of ambiguity as to the depth of their relationship and that scene above was arguably the best in the whole film. To then just cut to a rather basic inference of "nah she was just a bought sex fantasy" by comparison seemed very crude to me. That's not to say that takings things in this direction itself is crude but surely it would have been far more effective to actually have a scene were we see the actors express this?
It does feel like a bit of a kick in the teeth for Ana de Armas especially to build up a character with a good degree of sublty previously then have it capped off in that kind of fashion. Besides being a bit crude generally it also felt a bit dodgy for a role like that to end up being totally defined by the male actors relation to her.
I felt it also damaged the plot with his belief he was the child and discovering otherwise. That was really setup with Joi claiming "specialness" for him from it so having her present was its revealed not to be true seems like it would be much more effective. As it is K really has little to play off of when the revelation is actually made to him having to make do with another giant hologram version of her.
Oh, and this bit of poetry:
If you like really like sounds, you're going to love this movie, the sound techies must have had a blast making it. Uber loud sounds, resembling a steel freighter chaffing against a steel dock in a high wind rattle throughout the whole movie — regardless of what's happening. The loud sounds are the only consistent thread. The rest is composed of disjointed, disconnected scenes. The protagonist managed to maintain the same bland expression throughout the whole film, whether he is having sex, driving his space-ship, eating lunch, shooting someone in the head or being puzzled by the (non-existant) plot. The movie comes alive briefly when Harrison Ford enters the action but slowly fades back into the unremarkable, unintelligble, unfathomable boring story. I was happy when the finish came. Being cheap, I hung into the end, hoping something would happen. It didn't.
I can't account for the Canadian spelling of things. I can only pity them fools.The misspelling of 'non-existent' is a nice touch, and accidentally poetic. Just like the film, this stirring review challenges the very concept.
I liked the final giant hologram Joi scene. I think it served to show how far the Joi we knew, the one K was in a relationship with, had come as an individual from dime-a-dozen companion bot we met in the beginning. Maybe her programming made have to support K and K's dreams of being real and having a soul because a companion bot supports whatever their owner wants but at some point his dreams of being more than what he was manufactured to be rubbed off on Joi and she ascended the role she was built for.
When she became jealous after syncing with the blonde who slept over I really started to see a machine who's mind started to conflict with it's assigned role.
Why did Joi bring the prostitute over in the first place again? Was it a ruse by the replicant rebellion?
Just got back from watching this in the theaters.
I didnt really like it and thought it was boring. Flame me but I thought Ghost in the Shell was better.
5/10
Just got back from watching this in the theaters.
I didnt really like it and thought it was boring. Flame me but I thought Ghost in the Shell was better.
5/10
For sure and this is a time where I'll admit that my tastes look bad. I can understand why people enjoyed Blade Runner 2049 and why it got good reviews. The visuals were amazing and the story wasnt too bad.What you give Gits? I had it at a 6/10, I believe (it deserved a better fate theatrically).
But anyway, I saw both Gits and BR2049 in true IMAX and I can't agree. BR 2049 was better in every capacity.
Most significantly, BR2049 does a much better job of meditating on the questions of AI, and the meaning of life then Gits does.
When Joi synced with the pro, it reminded me alot of Samantha using a surrogate
That's a phenomenal sequence. Whenever I hear people say that scene doesn't really go anywhere, I'm like, "Are you kidding me? DID YOU SEE ALL THEM HANDS?????"When Joi synced with the pro, it reminded me alot of Samantha using a surrogate
For sure and this is a time where I'll admit that my tastes look bad. I can understand why people enjoyed Blade Runner 2049 and why it got good reviews. The visuals were amazing and the story wasnt too bad.
But it just wasnt enjoyable for me. Too long, scenes dragged on, Gosling had a constipated look half the time, Ford and Leto were barely in the movie. The pacing just ruined it for me.
I gave Ghost in the Shell 7/10. Better action and I enjoyed the AI concepts. But like I said, I can understand why people like Blade Runner and I know that I'm in a minority that didnt like the movie.