Opinion Billboard Chris got a dose of Aussie-tarianism

[ChosenOne]

You have a problem. Your obsession is pathetic and creepy. What have I ducked, exactly? Fucking fool

duck noted...


"...And i invite you to give me your examples of these large corporations, law firms, etc that had no white males because of 'those policies' you are claiming did not allow them..."

 

[MrShady]

Probably not the best decision you can make to become a troublemaker when you are someone's guest. You might get asked to leave. Support terrorists at your own risk.

And I've witnessed what a lot of people call " criticizing israel" and it's quite the "euphemism"

You can go ahead and read the Tuft student's op-ed and ponder if you truly believe that it supports terrorism, rather than criticize Israel for their actions.

That was enough for her to get ganged up by thugs and kidnapped. AIPAC really flexing it's muscles with these moves.

And the whole "you're not a good guest and causing trouble" for FREE SPEECH is the opposite of what USA is supposed to be, and what it represented.

MAGA really showing it's ass. Either you're a free speech absolutist or you're a Coward who only likes speech when it represents your views.

Make the First Amendment Great Again

 

[ChosenOne]

That downgraded from the death penalty pretty quickly


Probably not the best decision you can make to become a troublemaker when you are someone's guest. You might get asked to leave. Support terrorists at your own risk.

And I've witnessed what a lot of people call " criticizing israel" and it's quite the "euphemism"

Are you pro 'thought police'? Would you support the government handing out instructions on what people can think and say or else they are considered "troublemakers".

I invite you to quote what you think was her "troublemaker" thought that a person in the US should not think or say, if they want to be able to stay in the US.

 

[Rob Battisti]

You couldn't pay me to care about this fuckwit.

I couldn’t really be paid to care about anyone tbh

 

[nhbbear]

duck noted...


"...And i invite you to give me your examples of these large corporations, law firms, etc that had no white males because of 'those policies' you are claiming did not allow them..."

You didn’t even address my earlier post directly to you. So now, it’s a duck to not address your obsessive tagging? I really wonder which banned poster that I spurned in the past. It’s quite obvious. Never heard of you before you started spamming my name. It’s pretty pathetic and sad that I live rent free in your head

 

[ChosenOne]

You didn’t even address my earlier post directly to you. So now, it’s a duck to not address your obsessive tagging? I really wonder which banned poster that I spurned in the past. It’s quite obvious. Never heard of you before you started spamming my name. It’s pretty pathetic and sad that I live rent free in your head

I do not know what your "Earlier post" to me was.

What i do know, is that you still refuse to give me names of these corporations where you say "any body but white males" was hired there.

I do honestly not know if you are stupid and duped enough to believe that is a thing and that if we examined 'these companies' (the vast majority of companies) you would have a shocked grand awakening realizing they are DOMINATED by white males, and those policies were in place to simply try and balance work place more based on the population.

I also wonder if perhaps you just have a deep racism (that maybe you unaware of) that simply will not allow you to see the truth of this regardless of facts, as it is what you WANT to believe?

What i do not wonder is if you will try and prove your statement. I think you already know you could not and not even get close.

 

[cincymma79]

Bingo. I was making a point if you read my above post.

He's fine with his speech and protest as long as it's on the side of what the current political and administrative climate deems acceptable.

One thing I realized the past few weeks, free speech absolutist is a dying breed around here

Citizens can absolutely criticize Israel. Supporting Hamas isn’t critical of Israel. So if you do it they’ll find something to deport you for if you’ve left something out. Didn’t answer a question honestly? Sweet. Bye.

 

[cincymma79]

I do not know what your "Earlier post" to me was.

What i do know, is that you still refuse to give me names of these corporations where you say "any body but white males" was hired there.

I do honestly not know if you are stupid and duped enough to believe that is a thing and that if we examined 'these companies' (the vast majority of companies) you would have a shocked grand awakening realizing they are DOMINATED by white males, and those policies were in place to simply try and balance work place more based on the population.

I also wonder if perhaps you just have a deep racism (that maybe you unaware of) that simply will not allow you to see the truth of this regardless of facts, as it is what you WANT to believe?

What i do not wonder is if you will try and prove your statement. I think you already know you could not and not even get close.

You just call everyone racist because you hate Jews. We know that because of your overt efforts to hide it

 

[MrShady]

Citizens can absolutely criticize Israel.

For now. Until the ICEtroopers snatch you up and deport you without due process. How will anyone know you're a citizen? Trust the government they'll surely tell us.

So did the student who wrote the op-ed support Hamas? Or was she using her free speech to criticize Israel?

Are you not a free speech absolutist? Only when it favors your views? Bold.

 

[nhbbear]

But you can get arrested, see funding cut, have your business destroyed, in the US for saying 'you support Palestine' or many such other things, during this Trump regime.

And i invite you to give me your examples of these large corporations, law firms, etc that had no white males because of 'those policies' you are claiming did not allow them.

I will tell you i think you are both lying and sadly deluded to the point of stupidity as not only would the companies Trump is targeting not have white males but the white males would DOMINATE the upper management and CEO ranks in those companies.

But please, go ahead and prove me wrong, with a few examples of these companies that you have been convinced exists.

This post didn’t pop up for me, so now I get the “duck” comment. dei is promoting diversity, which is not white males in any business or enrollment. I should have included straight Asians as well, because they are negatively affected by dei initiatives and affirmative action which was ruled on by the scotus in 2023. And as for listing a company, only you would be dumb enough to think they are going to advertise this? But companies have been sued, successfully, for firing white people only to hire minorities. Diversity, equity, and exclusion programs, by definition have to look for minorities, thus excluding straight, white males. Coke put on a program for dei years ago that was titled the problem of whiteness (or something like that) and I have sat through dei trainings where white people are told to “yield their power and voice” to allow minorities to have a chance to speak. In fact, in one such training, after telling us this, the presenter called me out for being quiet and I told her that I was yielding my voice as instructed. I have been part of dei initiatives to attract and hire specifically black police officers and the problem we ran into was qualifications and disqualifications (criminal records and drug use). I am not against diversity, I am against discrimination in the name of diversity.

Below, you will find several links. The first one is 50 companies being sued because their dei initiatives were unfair and harmful to white males. One is for the healthcare company that fired a white guy so they could hire a minority and got sued for 4 million, so it is happening. And you will find an article blasting white people for being against dei. And finally, when you type in dei harming white people, you get dozens of results on how to not leave out white males in dei initiatives-proving that dei discrimination is the default setting where companies seek to only promote or hire minorities first and as a priority. I found many articles, one for specifically how to counter white men complaining about dei and what to say to them.

https://buildremote.co/dei/lawsuits...come%20out%2C%20we’ll%20update%20the%20report.


https://www.reuters.com/legal/legal...rts-reverse-bias-award-judges-say-2023-12-07/




https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/news-and-media/addressing-dei-concerns/

 

[ChosenOne]

This post didn’t pop up for me, so now I get the “duck” comment. dei is promoting diversity, which is not white males in any business or enrollment. I should have included straight Asians as well, because they are negatively affected by dei initiatives and affirmative action which was ruled on by the scotus in 2023. And as for listing a company, only you would be dumb enough to think they are going to advertise this? But companies have been sued, successfully, for firing white people only to hire minorities. Diversity, equity, and exclusion programs, by definition have to look for minorities, thus excluding straight, white males. Coke put on a program for dei years ago that was titled the problem of whiteness (or something like that) and I have sat through dei trainings where white people are told to “yield their power and voice” to allow minorities to have a chance to speak. In fact, in one such training, after telling us this, the presenter called me out for being quiet and I told her that I was yielding my voice as instructed. I have been part of dei initiatives to attract and hire specifically black police officers and the problem we ran into was qualifications and disqualifications (criminal records and drug use). I am not against diversity, I am against discrimination in the name of diversity.

Below, you will find several links. The first one is 50 companies being sued because their dei initiatives were unfair and harmful to white males. One is for the healthcare company that fired a white guy so they could hire a minority and got sued for 4 million, so it is happening. And you will find an article blasting white people for being against dei. And finally, when you type in dei harming white people, you get dozens of results on how to not leave out white males in dei initiatives-proving that dei discrimination is the default setting where companies seek to only promote or hire minorities first and as a priority. I found many articles, one for specifically how to counter white men complaining about dei and what to say to them.

https://buildremote.co/dei/lawsuits/#:~:text=Here%20are%2050%20companies%20in%20DEI-related%20legal%20battles,new%20announcements%20come%20out%2C%20we’ll%20update%20the%20report.


https://www.reuters.com/legal/legal...rts-reverse-bias-award-judges-say-2023-12-07/




https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/news-and-media/addressing-dei-concerns/

Cut to the chase and list the companies that i can look up that have no white males and especially not in leadership.

Pointing at 'hiring' of minorities or women (oh my god the horror) is not the same as what you said which is NO WHITE PEOPLE are getting hired.

Those are the companies i want to see, because as with the claim 'all movies are woke with POC stars or women' that i proved the person so very wrong in (over 90% still had white male leads and co leads) i was betting you would do what that person did. And that is switch to pointing to examples of PoC in positions as if that means no white people are in those positions.

And what it in fact usually means is the number of white people was cut from near 100% down 10% or so which then triggers you.

But give me the company names. They do not have to advertise 'we hire no white people' as that will be easily enough to tell with most companies.

 

[cincymma79]

For now. Until the ICEtroopers snatch you up and deport you without due process. How will anyone know you're a citizen? Trust the government they'll surely tell us.

So did the student who wrote the op-ed support Hamas? Or was she using her free speech to criticize Israel?

Are you not a free speech absolutist? Only when it favors your views? Bold.

If you’re not a citizen and post something you draw attention to your application. Everything else is fear porn

 

[nhbbear]

Cut to the chase and list the companies that i can look up that have no white males and especially not in leadership.

Pointing at 'hiring' of minorities or women (oh my god the horror) is not the same as what you said which is NO WHITE PEOPLE are getting hired.

Those are the companies i want to see, because as with the claim 'all movies are woke with POC stars or women' that i proved the person so very wrong in (over 90% still had white male leads and co leads) i was betting you would do what that person did. And that is switch to pointing to examples of PoC in positions as if that means no white people are in those positions.

And what it in fact usually means is the number of white people was cut from near 100% down 10% or so which then triggers you.

But give me the company names. They do not have to advertise 'we hire no white people' as that will be easily enough to tell with most companies.

Jesus. Move the goal posts much? “I demand you show me companies that discriminate against whites.” -shows companies. Demands “show me companies that have no white peoole.” Well, that one is easy. There are so many shops and companies that are strictly black or Mexican. Restaurants, clothing companies, shops. Simply do a search for “all black companies” and you get a whole list of companies, large and small, that are black owned and operated.

And again, deli’s sole purpose to being in minorities. That means no straight white males. So if you have a company that is really pushing dei, that means that they are much less likely to hire or promote a white male. Females are ok, but are losing ground and are just in front of Asian and white males. And have you ever heard of a white male dei person? I haven’t. It’s a prerequisite to be a minority for that position. That’s what makes white people rare in the business and academia world-they are the only ones where you can discriminate against legally. Not that you would get any white applicants for that job, but my guess is that they wouldn’t even get the courtesy of a no. They would simply be ghosted. Imagine a job description in todays society that would be “no black people need apply.”

You suck at this. I almost feel bad smashing you around. Almost, but you’re a twat, so not so bad.

 

[MrShady]

If you’re not a citizen and post something you draw attention to your application. Everything else is fear porn

So you're also okay if Billboard Chris were to get arrested and deported out of Australia because they didn't like his speech and sign saying "Children cannot consent to puberty blockers"

America was one of the only places in the world that, thanks to its constitution, valued free speech and took it seriously.

Guess you don't have no principled stance on what free speech really means. You're more of the "obey or submit" kinda guy.

 

[ChosenOne]

Jesus. Move the goal posts much? “I demand you show me companies that discriminate against whites.” -shows companies. Demands “show me companies that have no white peoole.” Well, that one is easy. There are so many shops and companies that are strictly black or Mexican. Restaurants, clothing companies, shops. Simply do a search for “all black companies” and you get a whole list of companies, large and small, that are black owned and operated.

You suck at this. I almost feel bad smashing you around. Almost, but you’re a twat, so not so bad.

No i did not change the goal post and you are lying as here is what i said...

"And i invite you to give me your examples of these large corporations, law firms, etc that had no white males because of 'those policies' you are claiming did not allow them."

So the problem is you are liar and stupid and you think you smash people because... wait for it... you are a liar and stupid.

Now answer my actual question and not the goal post shifting strawman question you tried to replace it with.

 

[nhbbear]

No i did not change the goal post and you are lying as here is what i said...

"And i invite you to give me your examples of these large corporations, law firms, etc that had no white males because of 'those policies' you are claiming did not allow them."

So the problem is you are liar and stupid and you think you smash people because... wait for it... you are a liar and stupid.

Now answer my actual question and not the goal post shifting strawman question you tried to replace it with.

Just looking back through this, I want to thank you for proving that you are a previously banned poster by stating that a few years ago, you had an argument with someone over movies when your join date is less than a year old. You fucking twat. Way to out yourself. And I have my suspicions on who you were based upon your “liar liar pants on fire” attacks. As usual, I didn’t lie.

You moved goal posts when you asked for proof that companies were using dei to discriminate and I did exactly that, which you ignored and ducked and then changed it. dei’s sole goal is to increase diversity and the only way to do that is to decrease white people in hiring and promoting of white people. Of course they’re not going to adversaries that, but if you had a Fortune 500 company changing leaders in 2020/21 you were almost guaranteed it was a black person getting the job.



And you want black owned businesses, again, it’s easy. Do they ever hire white people? Don’t know, don’t care. Odds are, they are predominantly black or minority. But no one really cares about who owns a company except minorities. That’s why they have “shop black.org” so people can be picky and discriminating in where they shop or do business with.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-20-biggest-black-owned-141347678.html

 

[freakroor]

if kids cant consent to anything then why are they are made to do all sorts of things.

 

[Cid]

I look at the murder rates in this country and it disgusts me how many shitheads there are in this country and their seemingly endless supply of illegal firearms. But what you view as lawless are because we have more rights. Criminals aren’t going to obey the laws- we all know this, but the difference is that the US isn’t going to punish law abiding citizens’ rights because of the actions of the few. Compared to the US, you have fewer rights and maybe you’re comfortable with that. I am not

No it's the murder bro. What's your thoughts on Haiti?

Statistically your our Haiti. Multiple murder rate here by 7 (I looked it up, 7 not 8) and you get USA. Multiple it by 7 again and you get Haiti. Your our Haiti. Sorry I had to put it this way.



You don't have more rights and freedoms. You have a narrow view that emphasizes guns and free speech because your culture puts massive weight on those two things. Other areas you are lacking.

Want an example of a freedom you want?

You bitch on this board all the time about not having a political party that represents you. Because you guys only have two political parties and a grossly inferior democracy.

I've read your posts bro, economically you're further left than I am. But your country doesn't have a center or even far left economic option for you to vote for. You get the shit left. The social issue left. You don't have freedom of representation. One of the basic freedoms of being in a democracy is freedom of representation.

And you don't have it.


There's this weird going on in America where anti western sentiment is on the rise from conservatives because we're all woke or something and it's pretty bad when you see posters coming at Australia. We're not Europe. Substantially further right than most of them (technically there's dictatorships in Europe). Shows from our "leftist" state run network is getting cancelled in your country...

It's not a good sign bro.

You are below us in ALL the freedom indices.
America has organizations that measure freedom based on your warped cultural views on freedom. And we beat you in them! Every single one. Because it's not just guns and free speech.

List of freedom indices - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[idrankyourbeer]

they should send the dude with a sign guy there.

 

[ChosenOne]

Just looking back through this, I want to thank you for proving that you are a previously banned poster by stating that a few years ago, you had an argument with someone over movies when your join date is less than a year old. You fucking twat. Way to out yourself. And I have my suspicions on who you were based upon your “liar liar pants on fire” attacks. As usual, I didn’t lie.

You moved goal posts when you asked for proof that companies were using dei to discriminate and I did exactly that, which you ignored and ducked and then changed it. dei’s sole goal is to increase diversity and the only way to do that is to decrease white people in hiring and promoting of white people. Of course they’re not going to adversaries that, but if you had a Fortune 500 company changing leaders in 2020/21 you were almost guaranteed it was a black person getting the job.



And you want black owned businesses, again, it’s easy. Do they ever hire white people? Don’t know, don’t care. Odds are, they are predominantly black or minority. But no one really cares about who owns a company except minorities. That’s why they have “shop black.org” so people can be picky and discriminating in where they shop or do business with.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-20-biggest-black-owned-141347678.html

Actually my arguments about movies were on a movie chat forum, so what i suggest is you never take a job where you need any investigator or sleuthing skills as you really suck at this. Oops.

And again i NEVER asked for the lie you are spreading and that is why you cannot quote me asking it. And you will not try.I quoted what i asked you and it was based on exactly what you said which that NO WHITE people where being hired and it was only "anyone but whites"...

"...And lol at calling them “equity” programs when the policy was “anyone but a white male” hiring practices..."

^The above is the quote from your post.

And this was my reply...

"...And i invite you to give me your examples of these large corporations, law firms, etc that had no white males because of 'those policies' you are claiming did not allow them..."

As you can see in the QUOTES, i never asked for "proof of discrimination" and that is your goal post move. What i asked for was proof of YOUR statement that ANYONE BUT WHITE MALES was being hired.

So again you are busted in a lie and you are busted for being... what for it... STUPID.