That's not even what you asked. I don't think you fully understand the things that you're saying, and I think you're misusing words and descriptions. It's becoming confusing.
This is what you asked:
That is not a request for a specific infection rate that only applies to certain ages. What you asked for is a yes or no answer to the question, "I'm specifically asking whether children carry this specific germ."
The answer is, yes they do. They can become infected, they can become ill, and they can spread that virus to others. They often do not become as ill as their older counterparts, which is to say they may be asymptomatic. Asymptomatic means that they may not show symptoms. Doctors have already determined that asymptomatic persons can spread the virus to others. That makes children even more dangerous in this situation, because they may be even less likely to know that they are carrying the virus. The fact that more children may be asymptomatic, or showing less severe symptoms, also means that the number of children carrying the virus is difficult to measure because they are not being tested and hospitalized.
You are straying dangerously close to "it's just a flu" territory with a lot of this. At this point, you should have updated a lot of your thinking to reflect the reality of how many people are dying even with all of the measures in place to reduce transmission.
