Obviously they should not use PEDs.
But I thought you said it is ok, as long as you are clean for the fight...
Do you have a source that backs your theory that cocaine is a PED and is used as such for high level competitions? I see a lot of back and forth on these boards about it being/not being a PED and no one sourcing their opinions.
it is much more than Weed.
DO you understand the effects each have on the human body?
If you do, then you probably know the answer
No prosecutor in the world would take that case. It's a non-issue.
I beg to differ.
Jon is a known snitch (by his own admission).
If police stormed his home, they'd find his stash and he'd talk and give his dealer.
You didn't say anything about PEDs in that statement, just criminal actions.
Isn't one of your arguments that Cocaine is not deemed PED so it should be ok??
I personally do not believe a person's personal life outside of the UFC should affect their employment. Especially if it's something like recreational drug use that does not impact their standing with the UFC and does not hurt anyone but themselves.
Wait!!! Are you calling Cocaine "recreational drug"????
And as I said (that you ignored), if Vitor (or Sonen) use TRT because they want to perform under the sheets.... does that change your perception??? (as long as they are clean for the fight)???
You are digging your own hole here
I am going to be honest here and say I am not completely aware of the details of the Healy situation as I have not read about it.
No problem, I explain.
He was caught, as you know, for metabolites.
But with week, they stay in your blood stream for a long time (it varies depending on how much you consume, how often, etc).
The thing is:He is licensed to smoke in Nevada, by law.
So he smoked weed. But Legal weed, which he has all the permits to use.
Yet the UFC found it ok to take away his bonuses (100k) and suspend fighters for smoking (same with Diaz).
And (I hope) we both agree that Weed is not half as bad as Cocaine.
However, I would say just because he was (apparently) wronged by the UFC or the commission, doesn't instantly mean Jones should be too.
That's the thing though.
I understand what they did to Healy. Those are the rules (though they found to their discretion to use the full extent of this rule).
What is baffling is that they not only did not take his bonus away, they maintained his victory, he maintain his belt, and the UFC is giving full support to Jon!
If anything, there's no consistency!
The point is not that they "wronged" healy!
They are simply making a mockery of what they did to Healy by doing the opposite now!