Dude literally everybody says that 145 isn't even a divison. How are u mad at me for not counting a division that doesn't even have 3 fighters in it. You sound crazy
Here's the problem with the bias, and hopefully you can see why people are looking at you the same way:
Is Nicco Montano better than Germaine Da Randamie? They have the same number of defenses, so that's about equal, but you said 145 isn't a division, so that gives Nicco a plus. Also, she's 1-0 in title fights, as opposed to 1-1 for GDR. Add those together and she's a much better champion.
Problems here is it's more than just numbers, it matters who you beat. And also, why should the defense matter more than the actual winning the belt? You're purposefully deselecting that from the record. Nicco beat Roxy for her belt, GDR beat Holly. You can throw out the FW division, sure, but you don't chuck the baby with the bath water. Your inclination to both ignore the title win AND featherweight makes the Cyborg fight null and void, when it's one of the more important title wins across women's MMA. Even if the FW challengers are awful, beating Tate, Rousey, Shevchenko, Rocky, Holm, Cyborg, GDR, Spencer, Anderson, and Peña
is better than beating Joanna, Eye, Carmouche, Chookagian, Maia, Andrade, Murphy, and Santos, and it's not even a question.
If you were to sit here and talk about how you think Val is better P4P, or how Val should have won the second fight, yeah, I get it. I'm mostly there too. But trying to downplay the championship accomplishments of Nunes vs Val is being willfully obtuse.