There was not really a lead, it was a foreign policy question.
Kind of an odd target considering most Bernie supporters (young folk) have 0 clue who Kissinger is.
They could, and should, but we all know that most of them won't.The young folk can always boot up the old google to find out who Kissinger is.
This is why I could never vote for an ideologue.
I thought Clinton's response to that was very good.
I didn't watch it, how did she respond?
Basically, she said she takes advice from lots of people and doesn't agree with everything any of them say, but she takes the good from them. There are people she disagrees with that she still can learn from, etc. Mentioned China specifically with regard to Kissinger.
There was not really a lead, it was a foreign policy question.
Kind of an odd target considering most Bernie supporters (young folk) have 0 clue who Kissinger is.
hiya SidJustice,
i think most people, in general, have only a vague idea who Mr. Kissinger is. if they think anything, they probably see him as that "elder statesman" kinda guy, but his history in foreign affairs is very troubling.
when you consider the reality that as Secretary of State, Mrs. Clinton pressed the flesh with so many world leaders and leading thinkers in foreign policy, its very peculiar (and unsettling) that she'd highlight Mr. Kissinger's name to burnish her resume.
'ol Henry has alot of blood on his hands, and by any reasonable measure, is a war criminal.
Americans were learning about who he actuallly is and what he actually did last night, if they didn't already know; https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...secretary-of-state-on-google-henry-kissinger/.
- IGIT
Kissinger also courted China away from the USSR and his theories on national defense lead us away from nuclear war.
If there was no Henry Kissinger the Cold War could have gone very differently in a bad way.
Clinton talked up her relationship with Kissinger in the last debate. That's the origin of this exchange.There was not really a lead, it was a foreign policy question.
Kind of an odd target considering most Bernie supporters (young folk) have 0 clue who Kissinger is.
I am probably more knowledgeable than most people my age on Kissinger (I am 28, so that is not saying much) and the guy definitely has more blood on his hands than most. Like most people though, he had his positives and his negatives.hiya SidJustice,
i think most people, in general, have only a vague idea who Mr. Kissinger is. if they think anything, they probably see him as that "elder statesman" kinda guy, but his history in foreign affairs is very troubling.
when you consider the reality that as Secretary of State, Mrs. Clinton pressed the flesh with so many world leaders and leading thinkers in foreign policy, its very peculiar (and unsettling) that she'd highlight Mr. Kissinger's name to burnish her resume.
'ol Henry has alot of blood on his hands, and by any reasonable measure, is a war criminal.
Americans were learning about who he actuallly is and what he actually did last night, if they didn't already know; https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...secretary-of-state-on-google-henry-kissinger/.
- IGIT
I am probably more knowledgeable than most people my age on Kissinger (I am 28, so that is not saying much) and the guy definitely has more blood on his hands than most. Like most people though, he had his positives and his negatives.
Literally all I am saying is that Kissinger is an odd choice for Sanders to latch on to. He could have gone for Albright, who is at least in the news, and whose record is something he can more readily relate to.
Then again, maybe the Kissinger attack was an attempt to relate to older voters, who Sanders is having trouble attacking. But I do not know.
All I know is that China is probably one of the things you cannot attack Kissinger for, and that is the only area Clinton mentioned him with. Along with, as Jack said, taking what she deems as good, and leaving the rest.
The young folk can always boot up the old google to find out who Kissinger is.