Barr and Mueller's Two Testie-fy (SCO v. 34)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I continue to say that people don't know what's in it but they'll care when they do. In response you repeat this stupid point.

Let's see if they care when they know about it.



Voters citing Muh Russia as the bottom of their concerns is a stupid point?


You really don’t understand politics...
 
Apparently Mueller's long time chief of staff will be appearing with him tomorrow and Jim Jordan is freaking out about it.
 
I continue to say that people don't know what's in it but they'll care when they do.

Based on what exactly?

The report has been out for some time, and every major news outlet has given their own in-depth analysis of the report.

Just because the general public doesn't match your personal level of outrage, doesn't mean they're ignorant of the contents of the report.
 
I'm deeply curious what's in that private Mueller report.
 
Looks like Weissmann may have made an improper offer to a witness in an effort to get dirt on Trump. Pretty sketchy, giving out non-public facts/info and details of the prosecution's theory in order to influence the witness's testimony. Probably wouldn't matter viewed in isolation, but it looks really bad given the failure of the Mueller probe. Just another example of the type of slime ball he is.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...issmanns-offer-to-an-oligarch-could-boomerang

Weissmann is a real creep. I hope this asshole ends up behind bars.
 
Based on what exactly?

The report has been out for some time, and every major news outlet has given their own in-depth analysis of the report.

Just because the general public doesn't match your personal level of outrage, doesn't mean they're ignorant of the contents of the report.
Of course they're ignorant. If they read or viewed an unbiased review of the report they'd conclude the president is very likely a criminal. Sadly the analysis on the right is hyper partisan and very biased.
 
If Mueller really didn't want to get up and testify he should have just pulled a Chappelle...

source.gif

giphy.gif


Yeah yeah, I know he's not incriminating himself but i wanted to use the gifs....<Moves>
 
Wow

And people bashed me when I said there was something wrong with Mueller.

Watching these goofs have to talk to him as if he is a 4 yr old is fucking sad
 
If it is in the report it is correct

In other words, I had no actual input in to the report
 
"I'm sorry...what was the question?" x100000000
 
double post
WTF is wrong with this forum today?
 
Of course they're ignorant.
You base this off of nothing more than the fact that the general public doesn't match your personal level of outrage.

If they read or viewed an unbiased review of the report they'd conclude the president is very likely a criminal.
Ah, so if only the American people had received the "proper" analysis, then they would match your personal level of outrage?

You're taking a very myopic approach to National issues.

Sadly the analysis on the right is hyper partisan and very biased.

Compared to what?
 
Of course they're ignorant.
You base this off of nothing more than the fact that the general public doesn't match your personal level of outrage.

If they read or viewed an unbiased review of the report they'd conclude the president is very likely a criminal.
Ah, so if only the American people had received the "proper" analysis, then they would match your personal level of outrage?

You're taking a very myopic approach to National issues.

Sadly the analysis on the right is hyper partisan and very biased.

Compared to what?
 
You base this off of nothing more than the fact that the general public doesn't match your personal level of outrage.

Wrong. If you want to have a conversation you can ask next time (instead of guessing).

It's based on polling that shows how low the % of the population is actually aware of and understand the report.

Ah, so if only the American people had received the "proper" analysis, then they would match your personal level of outrage?

You're taking a very myopic approach to National issues.

I sense the sarcasm but this is a stupid point. Of course not all analysis is equal, right? Are you stupidly claiming it's all equal in quality and is unbiased?

Compared to what?
Analyses that are based on fact. Duh.
 
You base this off of nothing more than the fact that the general public doesn't match your personal level of outrage.

Wrong. If you want to have a conversation you can ask next time (instead of guessing).

It's based on polling that shows how low the % of the population is actually aware of and understand the report.

Ah, so if only the American people had received the "proper" analysis, then they would match your personal level of outrage?

You're taking a very myopic approach to National issues.

I sense the sarcasm but this is a stupid point. Of course not all analysis is equal, right? Are you stupidly claiming it's all equal in quality and is unbiased?

Compared to what?
Analyses that are based on fact. Duh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top