Bankers want you to be taxed if you work from home

skysolo

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
21,281
Reaction score
10,700
A pro-big bank bail-outer who gave the banks billions while allowing them to evict millions of people is going to be president. The banks must be creaming their Brooks Brothers thinking of new ways to screw over working people.

What's next? Taxing water? Oh wait.



Choosing to earn a living from home once the pandemic ends is a privilege that you should pay for, according to strategists from Deutsche Bank AG’s research arm.



“Working from home will be part of the ‘new normal’ well after the pandemic has passed,” the strategists led by Luke Templeman wrote in a note. “We argue that remote workers should pay a tax for the privilege.”



The team propose a 5% levy for those who work from home on a regular basis and not because of a government lockdown mandate. Such a measure could raise $48 billion a year in the U.S. and about 16 billion euros ($18.8 billion) in Germany, they say, to fund subsidies for low-income earners and essential workers who are unable to work remotely.

Deutsche Bank Research undertook a survey to examine the major global shift toward remote work that occurred as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, which may endure as many professionals discover financial, personal and professional benefits of the change. According to the results, more than half of those working remotely want to continue doing so for between two and three days a week even after the health crisis ends. The survey of 800 people was conducted in September.



Working in the comfort of one’s own home saves money on travel, lunch and socializing, according to Deutsche Bank Research, and offers greater job security and flexibility, the strategists said. Yet people who are working remotely are also contributing less to the infrastructure of the economy, potentially extending the slump in national growth, they said.

“That is a big problem for the economy as it has taken decades and centuries to build up the wider business and economic infrastructure that supports face-to-face working,” Templeman said.

The proposed levy would be paid by the employer if they don’t provide their employee with a desk, whereas if the worker decides to stay home based on their own needs, they would be taxed for each day they work remotely, according to Deutsche Bank Research. In the U.S., the strategists calculate, such a tax could pay for a $1,500 grant to the 29 million workers making under $30,000 a year and unable to work from home.

“It does make sense to support the mass of people who have been suddenly displaced by forces outside their control,” Templeman said. “Those who are lucky enough to be in a position to ‘disconnect’ themselves from the face-to-face economy owe it to them.”
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't surprise me at all if this passed in some European or Scandinavian countries, but fuck this shit.

Don't even attempt to bring this shit to the USA.


Its so bulshit.

They say you need to pay more tax because you save up because you dont drive to work and dont eat lunch at some shit office cafeteria!

So if some office workers decide to pack their lunch and walk to work should they be taxed too?

If I stop wearing bra and panties and skip dinner should I be charged more tax?

When we are working from home we dont get allowonces from our company to pay for additional internet service as back up

And electricity bills is on us and last summer the AC is running all day because I am at home well all day working.


Who ever supports this bill putang ina nya.
 
Completely dumb. There are some new issues though with the rise in remote work however. Take Pittsburgh for example. We have a employer payroll tax related to employees working in the city. If we mainly move to remote, the city loses out on that revenue now if the person lives outside of the city lines. Local and state governments are going to have to access different challenges like this and rethink where they tax to make up the shortfalls if necessary. I don’t think you do that with a work from home tax though. There isn’t a reason to penalize that compared to working in an office.
 
I was thinking the opposite.

Businesses and workers who encourage and participate in remote work should get some sort of carbon tax credit.

Yesh!!!! And we dont clog up the metro with our farts!!
 
Work from home tax lol.

Your less need to use government infrastructure like roads,etc should actually warrant a tax cut!

Save money on lunch?

What work from home workers don't eat?

Putang ina nya!

It’s really backwards thinking. I get there is concerns about city revenue and how commercial real estate might tank soon but I don’t really see this as a solution.
 
Anything to crush people's will, which is what working in an office is for many people. A soul crusher.

Working from home should be encouraged not taxed.
 
Working from home should be encouraged not taxed.
Unfortunately, the problem with this kind of thinking is that it is a job killer. Many of these businesses/buildings/etc. need staff to keep it maintained/clean/running. Working at home eliminates the need for those kinds of jobs. Custodians/secretaries/assistants/etc. are out of luck.
 
Unfortunately, the problem with this kind of thinking is that it is a job killer. Many of these businesses/buildings/etc. need staff to keep it maintained/clean/running. Working at home eliminates the need for those kinds of jobs. Custodians/secretaries/assistants/etc. are out of luck.


Online secretaries is the new shit!

Sucks for men who loves fondling the sexy secretary!

But yeah that is a legitimate concern but I guess things can adopt and office space rates should go down anyway.

Kinda hearth breaking though the last month I went to our office for the last time to get my shit and end our lease contract.

During that time the place is deserted all the other tenants have left.

My boss has decided we work from home indefinitely!
 
Back
Top