War DosAnjos was a troll. I'm just pointing out how you jump to conclusions based entirely on your personal bias with no regard for any factual support.
A valid question of whom? If he was shouting it at the cop because he knows Freel is transgender obviously that's deliberate harassment. If the Metro article is accurate it seems there were plenty of witnesses and he continued to deny making the comments. That sort of sinks his own defence's argument of, "He didn't realise it was offensive". Apparently they also said he suffers from anxiety, depression and is a household carer for the man he considers a father figure. So at least the public defenders are doing their job.
...but sure, keep blaming "woke judges" and "sjws".
He may have known that the cop is transgender( a word he has overheard), but does he necessarily know exactly what a transgender is? If he knew just exactly what transgenders are, he would of known it's like handling a live bomb, you never know when and why they are offended. Like most people he would've just kept his mouth shut and pretend like that person isn't even there, cause who knows what nonsense someone will be accused of on any given day.
Just because he denied making the comments doesn't mean he realized that they were offensive. Very few people who are accused of a crime rarely just acknowledge it.
Great, and it just gets better, so he has depression and anxiety along with Aspergers but somehow he was found fit to be charged and fined. Worst case scenario the kid should of been educated in the matter, not punished.
Who else would I blame? Who are are the ones that put the transgenders at the top of the victim Olympics? The SJW's, you know, the ones who want to destroy a person's livelihood and life in general because someone disagrees with them. Oh my 6 year old told me he feels like a girl, yes let's pump him full of hormones and preform irreversible surgery so I can be woke and in style for the on-line community. Talk about pawning your own child.
This past summer I went out to price a job,we walked around the property and while measuring the driveway, the homeowners son(female to male transgender) came out said a few words to his father and jumped in his car and left. I knew right away he was a trans, you can tell from the size of his hands, feet, position of the hips, the overall bone structure and his voice was higher than my 14 year old son. Despite the hairy legs and sporadic facial hair, I knew he was a trans. Right then and there, I knew I wasn't going to accept this job, so I purposefully priced it at 1.5 times the usual price and got myself off the hook. I didn't want the job, not because he was a trans, but because of fear that one of my employees might say something offensive and at that point it wasn't going to be an issue that someone said something stupid but it would become an issue that ABC concrete( not actual company name) is a racist company and I would be put through the ringer and be destroyed online. It's a legitimate fear.
Judges are the ones who rule in favour of pumping 10 year olds full of hormones at the advice of some quack despite it being against the parents wishes. So what happens when the judge makes an incorrect ruling? Can the change just be undone and all is well or do these individuals, who at the age of 10, couldn't make a reasonable judgement suffer with the consequences of those decisions. Do you really think these judges aren't caving in to the wishes of the internet mob in the interest of self preservation? Who do you feel is to blame for this nonsense?
Yes, I know exactly what War Dos Anjos was. If I didn't honestly view you as one of the most respectable, reasonable and logical posters in this forum, I wouldn't be the least bit upset. Really you think the public defenders are doing their job by putting the ego of a trans attention whore above the ramblings of a mentally challenged person.