1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

Are you ok w 1-2 title defenses a year ?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by GOATTroll, Aug 11, 2015.

  1. GOATTroll Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2015
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    0
    First off, don't bring up Cain taking years off I will give you dubs.


    Because I am ok with it. The thing ppl don't get is fighter dont have a long shelf life.
    It's gets boring when there's no champs.

    3 or more fights a year is pushing it. These guys work hard and guess what, you
    should only get a crack at the King/Queen once or twice a year.

    UFC needs to do a better job promoting and testing prospects.
    There should also be a minimum 5 Victories before title shot.
     
  2. Drake Guest

    [​IMG]
     
  3. If all 10 champs fight twice a year, im cool with it.

    + active contenders.
     
  4. Appylion Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    I want moooooreeeeee
     
  5. [email protected]&WW Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,681
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    LA
    in an ideal world, i would love if every top level fighter could fight ever 102 days.

    realistically, it's understandable to go 204 days between fights.

    I am always disappointed when a high level fighter does not fight within 204 days, especially if it is for any reason other than injury.






    cain takes years off.
     
  6. DougGuntMMA Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary
    A champ should defend his belt every 4 months,
     
  7. mma2013 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    you ain't giving shit.
     
  8. tdluxon Red Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    7,942
    Likes Received:
    4
    Any less than 2 is pretty lame. Obviously if they are injured they are injured, but if they aren't they should be fighting ASAP. If they're healthy they should be fighting every 3-4 months
     
  9. MMA-woooooh!!!! Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    per division yeah why not, but any champ willing/able to do 3-4+ should get more respect
     
  10. Malthian Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,226
    Likes Received:
    0
    At least twice a year is ideal. More is a bonus but I wouldn't hold that against a fighter if they want to take holidays or take on other projects in between.

    If they're injured, I still want to see at least 1 defense per calendar year or have the title vacated. Nobody should ever be on the sidelines for more than 12 months and keep their belt.

    If they're sidelined longer, they can always give them the title shot when they get back.
     
  11. MikeyCanFly Sherbro 4 Life

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bluffton, SC
    i like 3 early year mid year and end of year
     
  12. Rubberneck76 Alizée Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    11,696
    Likes Received:
    181
    Location:
    The south of the north
    I'm fine with champs fighting 1-2 a year or less if injured. I am also not an entitled 12 year old with no clue of how the real world works.
     
  13. houjebek Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,047
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Belgium, the land of Vandamme, beer & RED DEVILS
    [​IMG]
     
  14. Zefram Cochrane Follow me on Pictogram

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2015
    Messages:
    10,078
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bozeman, Montana.
    2 is the minimum acceptable imo
     
  15. Canned Tuna Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2009
    Messages:
    12,072
    Likes Received:
    306
    Location:
    St. Louis
    I think 2-3 is ideal. I think 2 should be the standard. if you take a full year or more without a fight, like Cain, you should be stripped.
     
  16. DetachedOrchid MAYANS M.C.

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    At least twice. No longer than 5 months between fights would be ideal.
     
  17. pridefc33 Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Dallas,TX
    3 sounds perfect
     
  18. BisexualMMA Don't Put My Name in the Name of Steroids!

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    39,191
    Likes Received:
    1,309
    Location:
    Super Fight League Corporate HQ
    I've learned to live with it, but more often would be nice.
     
  19. JKS 77+&--#rT....

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    60,376
    Likes Received:
    378
    Location:
    Toronto
    2 I am fine with, 3 would be great but may be too much to ask for
     
  20. DaveHilly Black Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    5,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    i'd prefer more. I think theres a trend in fighters getting the title and then deciding that they want to slow down a little. It makes sense for them trying to hold onto it as long as possible but its not fair to the fans and other fighters in the division.

    I would like to see the UFC aim for 3 defences of each title a year. that's one defence every 4 months. So with a six week or so camp plus promoting responsibilities, fighters will still have like 6 months a year "off". (even though we know it's not really time off because they have lots of other stuff going on let alone hitting the gym every day)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.