Social Are illegal immigrants mostly bad people?

Are illegal immigrants mostly bad people?


  • Total voters
    155
I'm sure people getting paid under the table are very eager to answer surveys. Polls and surveys are useless, especially anonymous ones.
It's a lot better than your current position that the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants are making sub minimum wage because your gut tells you so. Do you have any data that supports your claim?
1. All the illegals are a huge net financial drain.
2. There are far more than 10 million illegals. They've been saying 11 million are in the country for decades. That many or more came in during the last 4 years alone. Wherever you're getting your stats are hilariously wrong.
1. They plainly aren't in most credible US studies done in the past couple decades. We've discussed this multiple times, and you always nope the fuck out when I point out to you that including the cost of educating American citizens is blatantly wrong.
2. I didn't say there were 10 million illegal immigrants in the US, use your brain for once, please.

Again, what's the lifetime cost of 10 million new US citizens? Hint, I did you a favor and picked an easy round number.
Hard to say. But some estimates show it to be about 451 billion per year.
Where are these estimates from? Link, please.
I'm not disputing America has done this in the past. That doesn't make it right. That needs to change and we have to pay more for fruits and vegetables. Too fucking bad if you want to pay less for it.
If the goal is ending the exploitation of laborers, why would you support guest worker programs then? Those are notoriously prone to abuse. Surely it's not because you're feigning sympathy to make a weak point.
You're just pulling numbers out of your ass. Overall, the average South Korean household spent 14.4% of its monthly budget on food in the first three quarters of 2024.
You're confusing basic stats. What I referred to is Engels coefficient (% of consumer spending), not % of income. Korea's is close to 30%, whereas in the US its barely over 10%. The latter is also based on individuals, while the former is based on households (aka individual Koreans spend even more on food). Note that this is always a very regressive metric, as in Korea your lowest quintile has to spend almost 40% of gross income on food.
 
in what country?
when I was in China, they despised Mongolian immigrants,
calling them yaojing.
 
It's a lot better than your current position that the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants are making sub minimum wage because your gut tells you so. Do you have any data that supports your claim?

Go to any illegal immigrant advocacy website. Research shows that many undocumented farmworkers are paid below minimum wage, often facing exploitation and wage theft due to their vulnerable immigration status. The prevalence of unauthorized immigrant labor in agriculture creates conditions ripe for abuse.
The way they do is is that they pay either under the table and/or by how many pieces of fruit picked.
1. They plainly aren't in most credible US studies done in the past couple decades. We've discussed this multiple times, and you always nope the fuck out when I point out to you that including the cost of educating American citizens is blatantly wrong.

They literally are.

2. I didn't say there were 10 million illegal immigrants in the US, use your brain for once, please.

You said there are AT LEAST 10 million - implying it's around that many, when in reality it is FAR MORE.

Again, what's the lifetime cost of 10 million new US citizens? Hint, I did you a favor and picked an easy round number.

Where are these estimates from? Link, please.

There is no accurate way to tell. You would have to factor in all Medicaid, SNAP, housing, emergency room visits which illegals use a lot and never pay for, and every other social program.

But the onus is on YOU to prove they WON'T be a huge financial drain because you're the one advocating for mass amnesty.

If the goal is ending the exploitation of laborers, why would you support guest worker programs then? Those are notoriously prone to abuse. Surely it's not because you're feigning sympathy to make a weak point.

I never said I was against guest worker programs. I'm for them to fill any temporary labor shortages.

And they should get full worker protections and safety standards as well as pay full taxes. But I want them to return once the season ends or their status ends. Not stay here indefinitely.

You're confusing basic stats. What I referred to is Engels coefficient (% of consumer spending), not % of income. Korea's is close to 30%, whereas in the US its barely over 10%. The latter is also based on individuals, while the former is based on households (aka individual Koreans spend even more on food). Note that this is always a very regressive metric, as in Korea your lowest quintile has to spend almost 40% of gross income on food.

1. Your stats are wrong. As of May 2025, South Korea's Engel's coefficient was 29.7%.
2. That is irrelevant to the discussion we're having.
3. We were talking about South Korea having to import a lot of fruits. But that's not the reason their Engel's coefficient may be relatively higher. It's because they eat out a lot compared to other countries. There are literally restaurants on every block and relatively much cheaper to eat out than other countries.
 
If the overwhelming majority had said “yes”, I don’t think I could hang on to my account here.
 
Go to any illegal immigrant advocacy website. Research shows that many undocumented farmworkers are paid below minimum wage, often facing exploitation and wage theft due to their vulnerable immigration status. The prevalence of unauthorized immigrant labor in agriculture creates conditions ripe for abuse.
The way they do is is that they pay either under the table and/or by how many pieces of fruit picked.
What research are you referring to? My stance has been clear and you keep misinterpreting it. A sizeable amount of farm laborers are actually paid above minimum wage, and it's even possible a majority are at this point. Farm labor isn't immune from economics.
They literally are.
If you're calculating the cost of illegal immigrants, why would you include the cost of educating US citizens, or their welfare?
You said there are AT LEAST 10 million - implying it's around that many, when in reality it is FAR MORE.
At least 10 million means there could be 10 million and 1 or a billion. This is basic English.

Realistically, the number is likely in the ballpark of 15 million, unless you think Latin American countries aren't doing their censuses correctly and overstating their populations.
There is no accurate way to tell. You would have to factor in all Medicaid, SNAP, housing, emergency room visits which illegals use a lot and never pay for, and every other social program.

But the onus is on YOU to prove they WON'T be a huge financial drain because you're the one advocating for mass amnesty.
We'd also factor in their economic output and taxes. This is how brain dead you are on this topic: You're whining that emergency room visits are a huge cost for illegal immigrants, even though the entire reason this is is because they often are underinsured or lack insurance. Guess what helps both: citizenship.
I never said I was against guest worker programs. I'm for them to fill any temporary labor shortages.

And they should get full worker protections and safety standards as well as pay full taxes. But I want them to return once the season ends or their status ends. Not stay here indefinitely
Congrats on being bad at reading again. Guest worker programs are inherently exploitative because it creates an underclass and forces them out of hte country before they can file complaints and follow up. There is no fixing that. If you are so against exploiting laborers, why would you support programs that themselves are only slightly less exploitative?
1. Your stats are wrong. As of May 2025, South Korea's Engel's coefficient was 29.7%.
How are you this bad at reading, is 29.7% not close to 30%?
About 12 or 13% of the average US household's spending goes to food. For Japan and Korea, that figure is just shy of 30%. This isn't purely down to food costs, since those countries are significantly less affluent than America, but you get the gist.
3. We were talking about South Korea having to import a lot of fruits. But that's not the reason their Engel's coefficient may be relatively higher. It's because they eat out a lot compared to other countries. There are literally restaurants on every block and relatively much cheaper to eat out than other countries.
Which is besides the point, if cooking was so much cheaper, why wouldn't they do that ? Are South Koreans dense and refuse to save money by cooking?

This is all your lame deflections from the point: South Koreans and Japanese have to spend about double what Americans do on food costs, in part because they import so much.

Do you think the average American can afford to spend double what they currently do on food?
 
Can they be guilty by association? I mean, I would assume they must be far left liberals at this point, and lets be honest, far left liberals are bad people. I might have to change my vote from on the fence, to yes.
 
What research are you referring to? My stance has been clear and you keep misinterpreting it. A sizeable amount of farm laborers are actually paid above minimum wage, and it's even possible a majority are at this point. Farm labor isn't immune from economics.

Bro stop gaslighting. Literally everyone knows illegal immigrant farm workers are exploited and underpaid. Shit is common knowledge.

Just do a simple Google search.


If you're calculating the cost of illegal immigrants, why would you include the cost of educating US citizens, or their welfare?

If illegal immigrants come into the country and have children, the vast majority fall below the poverty line and qualify for SNAP, Medicaid, etc. If those illegal immigrants were never allowed to illegally enter, all this additional cost would have never happened. Pretty simple concept.

On top of that, any illegal alien adults who come in and then apply for asylum also qualify for Medicaid and the other social services. They literally just need to apply for asylum.

At least 10 million means there could be 10 million and 1 or a billion. This is basic English.

Realistically, the number is likely in the ballpark of 15 million, unless you think Latin American countries aren't doing their censuses correctly and overstating their populations.

No realistically it's far more.

We'd also factor in their economic output and taxes. This is how brain dead you are on this topic: You're whining that emergency room visits are a huge cost for illegal immigrants, even though the entire reason this is is because they often are underinsured or lack insurance. Guess what helps both: citizenship.

If you give them citizenship, then it would be even more expensive because they'd all qualify for Medicaid. You're literally advocating for mass amnesty for MILLIONS of new people of a large majority we'd have to pay Medicaid for. GTFO. No one wants to pay for that shit.

Congrats on being bad at reading again. Guest worker programs are inherently exploitative because it creates an underclass and forces them out of hte country before they can file complaints and follow up. There is no fixing that. If you are so against exploiting laborers, why would you support programs that themselves are only slightly less exploitative?

Employing undocumented aliens with zero leverage is even more exploitative.

Which is besides the point, if cooking was so much cheaper, why wouldn't they do that ? Are South Koreans dense and refuse to save money by cooking?

Because Koreans do not have time, work long hours and there are restaurants and take out places literally on every block. It's much more convenient ordering or eating out. I know this for a fact. I'm from South Korea.

This is all your lame deflections from the point: South Koreans and Japanese have to spend about double what Americans do on food costs, in part because they import so much.

Do you think the average American can afford to spend double what they currently do on food?

Why in the world would Americans need to spend DOUBLE just because we pay fruit farm workers a fairer wage?

This is a complete straw man.
 
I disagree. Yes, having a unique set of skills can bump you up in pay, but a monkey could pick strawberries so the skill requirements for that job are extremely low. Plus, it’s hard manual labor and I don’t see many Americans willing to do that kind of work for min wage

You disagree but you didn't respond to anything in my post. What exactly are you disagreeing with? Pay is not dictated by scarcity in the labor market?
 
Unless the price of labor is higher than the profit margin of the job in question, then said job just vanishes into thin air.

Eventually sure, plenty of businesses run their business at a loss for a short period. Some even last years, until eventually they do go out of business. Some business owners live too much on hope. Hope is like a carrot they keep chasing but it never gets them anywhere.
 
You disagree but you didn't respond to anything in my post. What exactly are you disagreeing with? Pay is not dictated by scarcity in the labor market?

I think it is. Take police departments for example. Police departments nationwide have experienced shortages after police officers quit and retired in droves during the shitshow that was 2020. Many officers said “fuck this” after having people scream in their faces and throw things at them for the actions of a police officer in Minneapolis, having their administrators calls for defunding the department and the disbanding of special units such as gang units-which would have returned those officers to working a beat again and they decided to quit in protest, and the general feeling of betrayal by the public-again, for incidents that did not happen in their city.

Anyway, after all of this happened, departments couldn’t meet their minimum number of officers as required by contracts with their cities to always maintain that minimum number of officers. How did police departments solve this, or attempt to? They increased the salary for retention and offered sign on bonuses-especially for officers that were already certified so that those officers could work with minimal training required to be street effective- a few days learning policies and procedures within the department and a week or two of training with a field training officer to make sure they were competent and to learn the city and how to find their way around.

So, in this example, the scarcity of viable candidates led to pay increases. In general, if you have a job that not many people want or they have trouble filling those spots, employers have been forced to look at pay as a primary driving force behind people being willing to do a certain job.
 
When you hear the term illegal immigrant there is strong negative connotation that they are bad people.

What's your perspective on that?

Are they mostly bad? Or they are decent people coming from a desperate situation, just trying to make way to greener pastures?

I voted 'No.'
Just because they're here illegally it does not make them bad people.
By being here illegally they are, by definition, criminals and should be deported back to their country of origin.

The question if they're 'bad people's is a moral question. I can see the possibility of a portion of the illegal immigrant community being 'good.' However whatever provisions and exceptions we make for the good illegals will be taken advantage of by the bad illegals.

The question if they're illegal is a legal question, and by appeasing then with exceptions is insulting the legal migrants who did everything legally and morally.

They - illegal migrants - all should be deported, without exception.

Any questions TTTT?
 
When you hear the term illegal immigrant there is strong negative connotation that they are bad people.

What's your perspective on that?

Are they mostly bad? Or they are decent people coming from a desperate situation, just trying to make way to greener pastures?
Yes, illegal immigrants who are not legitimate refugees fleeing from grave danger are bad people. They choose to start their new chapter in life by commiting a crime.
 
Here is a quick guide on how to deal with migrants

If it's black send them back

If it's brown hire for your lawn

If it's white wave and smile
 
By being here illegally they are, by definition, criminals and should be deported back to their country of origin.
It's astonishing why this thread is still ongoing.:



A simple solution to a simple problem. If 2 + 2 is the problem and you need a whiteboard and 4 markers to justify that 4 isn't the answer, you're being dishonest.
 
Yes, illegal immigrants who are not legitimate refugees fleeing from grave danger are bad people. They choose to start their new chapter in life by commiting a crime.

So all people who commit a crime are bad people and wicked?

Let me ask you this.. Rosa Parks committed civil disobedience and was arrested. Was she evil?

Life is not as simple as you deem it, sir. Just because a law is broken doesn’t mean the offender is evil.

Break free from your simplistic understanding of life.
 
Maybe not bad people, but completely and utterly untrustworthy at the very least.
 
Bro stop gaslighting. Literally everyone knows illegal immigrant farm workers are exploited and underpaid. Shit is common knowledge.

Just do a simple Google search.

Let's see what your source says: Average earnings of nonsupervisory farmworkers is $16.62 / hour. AKA above minimum wage.

Illegal labor is obviously exploited, but here's the distinction you miss. Folks love to imply that if only farms paid minimum wage Americans would do those jobs. Yet a lot of illegal labor makes above minimum wage, which means that entire premise you parrot is bullshit. We're not talking paying minimum wage to get Joe American to work the fields, you're talking a massive premium on that with all the downstream effects.
If illegal immigrants come into the country and have children, the vast majority fall below the poverty line and qualify for SNAP, Medicaid, etc. If those illegal immigrants were never allowed to illegally enter, all this additional cost would have never happened. Pretty simple concept.
And these workers never upskill or move up in wages? They just forever stay under the poverty line?

That's a nice theory except second generation immigrants frequently outperform natives in income mobility and business generation.
On top of that, any illegal alien adults who come in and then apply for asylum also qualify for Medicaid and the other social services. They literally just need to apply for asylum.
Which is an outright lie since most states require the application be approved, filing alone isn't enough.
If you give them citizenship, then it would be even more expensive because they'd all qualify for Medicaid. You're literally advocating for mass amnesty for MILLIONS of new people of a large majority we'd have to pay Medicaid for. GTFO. No one wants to pay for that shit.
Which is offset by taxes and economic productivity. Never mind that a lot, if not most illegal immigrants wouldn't even hit the threshold in states like California.
Employing undocumented aliens with zero leverage is even more exploitative.
Right, which is why the best option for ending exploitation of farm laborers is a path to citizenship. Let's refer to your source you didn't read. Oh right, it literally calls out the H-2A program as exploitative.

"As a response, farm employers and industry associations have lobbied Congress to reduce the required wage rates for migrant farmworkers in the H-2A visa program—known as the Adverse Effect Wage Rate (AEWR)—and even sued the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to invalidate a new methodology for setting AEWRs."
Because Koreans do not have time, work long hours and there are restaurants and take out places literally on every block. It's much more convenient ordering or eating out. I know this for a fact. I'm from South Korea.
Koreans spend about 14% of consumption on eating out and another 14% on eating in. The US has the same 50/50 split, except total spending only comes out to about 10 or 11%. So again, Americans spend less than half of what South Koreans spend on food as a share of disposable income, whether it's eating out or eating in.

TLDR: Food is significantly more expensive in South Korea.
Why in the world would Americans need to spend DOUBLE just because we pay fruit farm workers a fairer wage?

This is a complete straw man.
This all started when you claimed we should just import our food stuffs, like Japan and South Korea, even though those countries spend double what we do per capita on food. I've repeatedly asked you how much more Americans should be willing to pay for food, and all you do is prattle on about sources you don't read or even comprehend. So again, if we eliminate all illegal labor, how much more do you think the average American's grocery bill will be?

You do realize there are entire countries in the world that import almost all their fruits right? South Korea and many Middle Eastern countries for example imports a huge chunk of their fruits - yea it's a little bit more expensive for fruit and veggies but not ridiculously so.
 
And now we have labor laws, safety standards and child labor became illegal.

You're basically making excuses for exploitation of people because "we did it in the past."

Do you realize it is still legal to employ children in farms?

Those aren't children so I don't know why you're bringing that up.

And I'm not "making excuses for exploitation," I'm pointing out that exploitation is an integral part of the capitalist system. It's not that we did it in the past and are no longer doing it, we're doing it right now and will continue to do it for the foreseeable future. The exploitation is less savage than it was in the 19th century but it's still there.

These are custodial workers at Columbia University. They're covered under labor laws, safety standards, OSHA, etc. Guess what, they're still exploited.

custodial_day_1.jpg
 
Back
Top