- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 15,654
- Reaction score
- 2,472
Absolutely this. My brothers a firefighter. Telling my kid he should be a firefighter like his uncle.I’ve enjoyed my time but absolutely will not encourage either of my two boys to follow after me. Be a fireman if you want to work in public service.
Letting him run off or shooting him in the back were the only options, is that right?
we can't create a culture where police are only allowed to use deadly force back after they are attacked
remember, these are split of the second decisions in the midst of a violent scurfelled
that law should be that if you attack a police officer with a weapon, your liable to be shot - period
I wonder what you would do if a large violent felon had tazed and was fighting with you in the split of a second - how much "lee way" you would give him
No, that's not what I said.
The shooting is justified because the perp pointed the taser at the shooting officer's partner.
The kick afterward is distasteful, and along with the standing on the perp's shoulder and not administering medical aid for over two minutes I agree with the termination of both officers.
Sorry, but this is just not true. Regardless of whatever greater point you were trying to make, 'whites' absolutely are NOT "the most rigid, well organized, and violent gangs". In CA, where prison politics demand that people segregate, the Mexicans are overwhelmingly the most militant, well organized, disciplined gangs in CA prisons. Specifically, that would be the Northerners, followed by the Sureno cars.
Outside of CA, where prison politics aren't so serious, whites generally DON'T stick together, even when one of their own is being victimized. If you've ever seen the movie 'Shotcaller', I can tell you that what they showed in the beginning of the movie would never happen in CA - I'm talking about where the main character, a white guy, first enters prison and gets into a fistfight with a black guy on the yard in a CA state penitentiary. That is complete fiction because every single prisoner on that yard knows that if a member of one race is attacked, everyone must jump in and participate. Further, some CA yards have a 'no hands policy', meaning if you have beef with someone, you drop it unless it's worth killing them over. So everyone is strapped. For those reasons, in the real world, individual fights between races are virtually non-existent, other than sanctioned riots/hits. Great care is taken to bring in new guys and school them on the rules. The thinking is that if this new guy fucks up and he is a member of my race, it doesn't matter whether I know him or not, or what car he rolls with. If he does something stupid, and gets himself attacked, every single white guy on that compound must participate unless they want to be booked themselves by their own guys.
Going back to the statement you made, I believe I've corrected you on this before, which I'm pretty sure you ignored. You stated that the "Aryan Brotherhood" has more prison murders than any other gang, and this was your reasoning for saying that whites are the most militant, organized, and violent group in American prison. The only reason the AB had more murders on the books is because the Mexican Mafia were using them as contract killers. Make no mistake about it, the AB is subservient to the Mexican Mafia in CA and a few other Western states.
Again, from my direct first hand experience, you've got this all backwards.
In prison, whites are the only group that continually espouse racial supremacy. They dedicate their lives to it, rock swastikas, 1488's, etc., and have very sincere beliefs about segregated societies. I'd say about 50% of the peckerwood car (whites) take that shit very seriously. No other group spouts anything even remotely similar beyond just basic prison politics of sticking with your own kind for protection. Don't believe me? Go look at what the Aryan Brotherhood stands for and the imagery they blast all over themselves. Now go look at the big homies in the Mexican Mafia, the Bloods/Crips, MS, Latin Kings, etc. - none of their shit makes race a focal point like the whites make it.
So he had all of these options and he chose to shoot someone in the back.
Is that right?
Absolutely this. My brothers a firefighter. Telling my kid he should be a firefighter like his uncle.
I probably would have shot him also. I doubt I'd demand a game of tag if a guy shot a taz gun at me. But who knows
You have never been to police academy. They will not teach any of this.we can't create a culture where police are only allowed to use deadly force back after they are attacked
remember, these are split of the second decisions in the midst of a violent scurfelled
that law should be that if you attack a police officer with a weapon, your liable to be shot - period
I wonder what you would do if a large violent felon had tazed and was fighting with you in the split of a second - how much "lee way" you would give him
APD is currentlg engaged in a mass work stoppage.
The NYPD did this a few years ago, but it backfired as there was virtually no change in violent crime while they stopped working.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/09/nyc-cops-did-a-work-stop-yet-crime-dropped/
This gif was built for our time...You have never been to police academy. They will not teach any of this.
I think this is more appropriate when I see cops shooting people in the back and hitting people with batons then having their brains scrambled.This gif was built for our time...
Did he mean to say 18 divided by 3?the district attorney said they were 18 ft apart when he shot him .. correct me if I'm wrong but they look much much closer than that from what I saw .. I think homeboy is trying to exaggerate a bit to enhance the charges lol
Yep. But those kind of people don't think that far ahead, or give a shit if they do.Yep. Sadly, there will be riots after any acquittal or hung jury. This fucking DA is guaranteeing the future destruction of the city he is supposed to protect
I think this is more appropriate when I see cops shooting people in the back and hitting people with batons then having their brains scrambled.
Haven’t confirmed myself but just heard an interview on the news and the guy said this same DA has just recently filed aggravated assault with a deadly weapon charges against some other cops in an unrelated case...in regards to them using a taser on someone.
That would present a problem if he wants to argue that a taser is a deadly weapon in that case and then argue that a person using a taser on a cop isn’t a lethal force situation.