- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,876
- Reaction score
- 26,099
Agreed. But it depends on how you are skeptical. The ability to be objectively and professionally skeptical is becoming a lost art.
You would not be called a racist for being quietly and internally skeptical. You probably would not even be called a racist for asserting more information is needed. 'Man-that sounds bad-but I think I am going to wait for all the facts before forming any conclusions."
I am not suggesting this is right or fair, but the majority of people who are being considered racist for their skepticism are being what I refer to as 'obnoxiously skeptical'. One of the key traits of an obnoxious skeptic is that they obfuscate the larger, more critical truth (a lot of racism going around) with a smaller, less critical truth (there are some people making shit up). One way to avoid doing this is to acknowledge the larger more critical truth before making your point.
Jesus, look at all the mental gymnastics you have to go through when you could just open your eyes and see the reality of our world. Does your programming really deny you the ability to be objective in any capacity?
I feel sorry for you.
