- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 17,993
- Reaction score
- 8,123
When people shoot people, the problem is people.
On the other hand, I'm surprised psychological exams are not required to own guns. In my opinion, they will help. Also better education on gun ownership and use. .
I was in another thread recently, that said 10,000 people die a year in the world from fresh water snails.
10,000 people die in the US from suicide by gun, and 10,000 from homicide by gun.
Guns are twice the concern for me as fresh water snails.
When people shoot people, the problem is people.
Psychos in other countries have to get creative: Sweden attack: Sword-wielding man kills 2 at school
If that had been America psycho kid would have easily obtained a gun and killed 10x as many.
What Barry and the Lib army won't admit is that our gun violence numbers are driven by the gun violence problem in inner city communities. It's racist to point that out though.
Exactly. It's like saying Nebraska is better than California because the poverty and unemployment rates are lower.I always particularly hate the cross nation comparisons. We've always had more guns and more gun violence than Europe. We also had more freedom and they seem to support our gun culture when they need someone to police the free world or defend it from psychos.
Also, that chart about gun ownership vs. gun deaths is pointless. NY and Illinois and other states with violent big cities are considered safer than places like Wyoming?
Anyhoo, another thread where people will use emotion based arguments to support taking away other people's rights. You don't stop suicide by taking away guns. You don't stop criminal violence by taking away legal firearms. You don't change people that way.
How about those people focus on the actual problems instead of how the problems ultimately manifest.
The problem with this, is that a psychologist will let their own personal opinion get in the way. One psychologist might let someone with a history of severe alcohol abuse and depression get one because they are pro-2A, the one a few blocks down will say no to a guy who wants one to go plinking with because he translates that as 'has tendencies towards violent fantasies' or some such.
Sadly, there really isn't an easy answer. I dislike parroting the common answer of 'expand mental health services' because that would only help those that seek it. Granted, it would help those that do use it, but many wouldn't use it anyways. But it's hard to argue that it wouldn't be a bad start.Fair enough. What, then, in your opinion can be done to solve the problem of people with mental problems getting their hands on guns?
Lots of cars sit in people's yards without registration - for years on end. And as long as the car isn't operated on public roads, well, I'm sure you already realize this - registration is not required. And then there's the act of junking a vehicle without a registration; piece of cake really.Every gun should be registerd like a car every few years.
No, that's the job of the Department of State, BATF&E, FBI, CIA, DEA, etc.Tough laws don't prevent gun manufacturers from letting guns go unaccounted for.
I suppose a larger difference is guns can be concealed, hidden, and tossed much more easily and cars aren't generally used in intentional homicides.Lots of cars sit in people's yards without registration - for years on end. And as long as the car isn't operated on public roads, well, I'm sure you already realize this - registration is not required. And then there's the act of junking a vehicle without a registration; piece of cake really.No, that's the job of the Department of State, BATF&E, FBI, CIA, DEA, etc.
True. They're also next to useless when it comes to grouse hunting. Also protecting one and one's own family from inter-personal violence.cars aren't generally used in intentional homicides.
That doesn't really change my point.
Also, lancelot there would likely have wounded a lot more people, but that doesn't mean he'd have killed more.