aikido vs sub-wrestling

Looking for more stuff and I'll post when I find it but here is what I was talking about.

"In its early, pre-World War II years, access to Aikido instruction was very exclusive, limited to individuals with proper, personal high-level introductions to Morihei Ueshiba. It was not until the 1950’s, under the leadership of Kisshomaru Ueshiba, the founder’s son and inheritor of the leadership of Aikido, that Aikido was widely taught in Japan."

:: Divisions ::

That's not unique to Aikido. That's just the old way that most martial arts were taught. Kano had to learn his Jiu Jitsu in the same way.

The whole idea of martial arts for the masses was pushed out by Kano. That's another one of those positive changes Judo made to training philosophy. Kano put Judo and Kendo in the public schools and promoted it all around the world. Karate and Aikido followed this example soon after.

Just because Ueshiba originally only taught people he had personal connections to does not mean that he had a requirement for them to hold dan level rank in Judo.
 
That's not unique to Aikido. That's just the old way that most martial arts were taught. Kano had to learn his Jiu Jitsu in the same way.

The whole idea of martial arts for the masses was pushed out by Kano. That's another one of those positive changes Judo made to training philosophy. Kano put Judo and Kendo in the public schools and promoted it all around the world. Karate and Aikido followed this example soon after.

Just because Ueshiba originally only taught people he had personal connections to does not mean that he had a requirement for them to hold dan level rank in Judo.

Not sure I follow. You said:

Balto said:
As far as I have seen Aikido always accepted beginner students as well as experienced students from other arts.

And this simply wasn't true. Not anyone off the street could take aikido. The kind of nerd people you saw at your college Aikido club that you were part of would not have been allowed in. It was invitation, letter of recommendation only plus martial arts proficiency pre WWII, and even up to about 1955. Here is what I found so far. Keep in mind this is in response to EGDM and you.

"Before World War II, aikido students were required to have previously studied martial arts, and have a letter of reference from their instructor. This meant that all pre-war students already possessed basic skills of uke (the attacker), including falling and striking."
Yoseikan Aikido - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"First of all, aikido is a post-World War II phenomenon. Morihei Ueshiba and his fledgling martial art were known primarily in martial arts circles, not by the general public, prior to the war. What has become aikido today has been shaped primarily by the Ueshiba family through the auspices of the Aikikai Hombu Dojo system after 1955."
“Whose Aikido Are You Practicing?” by Stanley Pranin

"Tohei Sensei: I think it was in 1940. Kisaburo Osawa came in about a week later. I had been thinking what a poor state of affairs it was that I could train on my own for a couple of weeks and come back and throw everyone in the judo dojo. "Why bother with a martial art like that?" I thought. It was then that I met Ueshiba Sensei. Shohei Mori, one of my seniors at the judo club who had worked on the Manchurian Railway, told me about a teacher with phenomenal strength and asked if I’d like to meet him. He gave me a letter of introduction and off I went."

"I was just starting to think that if this was aikido I might as well forget it and go home. Just then Ueshiba Sensei returned. I produced my letter of introduction and he said "Ah yes, from Mr. Mori..." Then as a demonstration, he began tossing one of the larger uchideshi around the dojo.
. . .
I thought it looked kind of fake until Ueshiba Sensei told me to take off my coat and come at him. I got into a judo stance and moved in to grab him. To my great surprise, he threw me so smoothly and swiftly that I couldn’t even figure out what had happened. I knew right then that this was what I wanted to do. I asked permission to enroll immediately and began going to the dojo every day from the following morning."
Ki Aikido Singapore - Ki No Kenkyukai Singapore

"The occupation forces (General Headquarters, GHQ) outlawed martial arts. There had been judo, kendo, and aikido. Martial arts practice had been required in school. The prohibition was in effect for eight years (1945- 1953). I was in elementary school during this time. You couldn't practice in public."
Shuji Maruyama, Founder of Kokikai Aikido | Aikido Kokikai International

Now if you are just quibbling over the blackbelt requirement well I'll post it when I find it. But think about it, use a little common sense, you need a letter of recommendation from your instructor or seniors, and martial arts (judo, karate or kendo) were required in the Japanese education system from elementary to high school. On top of that all the guys who came out of the pre war era had previous blackbelts in either judo or Shotokan Karate. Gozo Shioda was already 3rd dan blackbelt judo by the time he graduated high school and before he met Ueshiba.

But all this goes back to my main point that pre wwII, you had to have a firm base in grappling or karate or preferably both. And that's the most effective way for it to be taught for submission grappling, mma, or the street. It's only a topping off martial art, not a core martial art that you can establish a base in.
Roy Dean even talks about that in his DVD, where he says that the founder didn't learn Aikido. He learned judo, karate, jiu jitsu before he stated aikido and already had a base. But at the highest level, those topping off techniques can make a difference. Ken Chertow teaches a wrestling technique that was popular in wrestling a couple decades ago that is an Imrinage. And Billy Robinson in his advanced curriculum dvd is teaching an advanced catch wrestling technique that is a Kotegashi. If the technique works it works no matter where it came from or what the label.

Now for that mob melee stuff, yeah I think it's kind of gay but if you actually stop to think about it, there's no real good way to mimic a 5 on one attack situations without compliance, because people will get seriously hurt and things can escalate. There's got to be a little bit of compliance there. Look at a BJJ belt test though. Even though it's a one on one situation, because you have to roll with 60 guys, people will not be anywhere close to 100%, there's a bit of compliance based on the reality of, well a guy might get seriously hurt or die if everyone went 100% in a bjj belt test.
 
Last edited:
BruceLeeMMA,

I believe Ueshiba taught his nephew from scratch. I guess they both studied Daito Ryu and a few other things before Aikido was invented, but if you go back before Aikido was created it's kind of a given that they will be doing something else.

I don't really mean to quibble with trivial exceptions so I guess it doesn't matter whether it was an official rule or not. As a practical matter, most of the early guys in Aikido had previous experience in other arts.

My point is that I don't see how this in any way explains Aikido's lack of effectiveness. It is not unique to Aikido. Judo was founded under exactly the same circumstances.

Kano was obviously proficient in Jiu Jitsu before he created Judo. His early Judo dojo was small with only a couple of students he knew personally. All of the ones I know of also had previous experience in Jiu Jitsu. This just makes sense since that was the only thing available to previously train in at that time.

But you won't hear anybody talking about how Kano presupposed experience in Jiu Jitsu as a condition for learning Judo, even though that's how he and most of his earliest students did it. I don't know of Kano ever mentioning that. It's just an incidental fact of the circumstances. And once Kano expanded Judo to the masses, he required no previous experience. This is exactly what happened with Aikido too.

It's not just Judo either. The early founders of Shotokan all had previous experience in different arts, etc. All the gendai budo have a similar story.

But only Aikido rationalizes ineffectiveness by claiming that it's just a finishing art and was always intended to be trained only after prior experience in other arts.

The thing that is different about Aikido is its core philosophy as an art. It's not the fact that the founder and early students had previous experience because that is the same as every other art. It's not the fact that WWII affected it because WWII affected every other art in Japan.

The most reasonable explanation is that Aikido doesn't work because it's fundamentally flawed in its approach. That is a lot more reasonable than attributing it to lack of prior experience and WWII which all the other arts seem to have dealt with just fine.
 
It is interesting that as people are having a more open mind to TMA's, thanks in no small part to Machida, they are finding Aikido does have something to add to the other grappling arts. Even Erik Paulson is incorporating it in his materials now.
 
A dude just shot up a theater...all this crap about "effectiveness" is nonsensical. Real fighting is about weapons and numbers
 
A dude just shot up a theater...all this crap about "effectiveness" is nonsensical. Real fighting is about weapons and numbers

Dude, serius question? Where do you live? The 4th century? Some favela in rio? Pussy ass lalaland? Yeah bar fights are about numbers, wars are about guns, but I have engange in countless fist fights in my country, in a soccer fierld, in a rugby field, in school, after school, outside clubs, even inside clubs, I have never ever had to use a weapon, and most of the times, it was 1 vs 1... So just because you live in pussyland or in hell, or you are surrounded by criminals and serial killers, doesnt mean most of the population is, as a matter of fact, I doubt most people in sherdog live the stressful kill or die life style you do.

Edit. Holy crap just read about the shooting... Damn people is crazy, still under your logic, I would thinks tanks is the way to go..fuck guns and numbers.
 
Last edited:
A dude just shot up a theater...all this crap about "effectiveness" is nonsensical. Real fighting is about weapons and numbers

you're repping Team Garcia pretty hard. You still armbarring fools while you are mounted? did you get yourself a brown WAR belt when you promoted yourself?

just curious
 
A dude just shot up a theater...all this crap about "effectiveness" is nonsensical. Real fighting is about weapons and numbers

So you and your friends show up to the theater every time wearing body armor and rifles? Because that is what you would have had to have immediately available in that situation in order to have superior weaponry and numbers.

Sometimes you have to make due with less for whatever reason. That's where this stuff comes in.
 
It is interesting that as people are having a more open mind to TMA's, thanks in no small part to Machida, they are finding Aikido does have something to add to the other grappling arts. Even Erik Paulson is incorporating it in his materials now.

Incorporating useful techniques into a system already solidly based on JKD concepts of aliveness and practicality is quite different than training in an art where the concepts of JKD are discouraged or outright forbidden.
 
So you and your friends show up to the theater every time wearing body armor and rifles? Because that is what you would have had to have immediately available in that situation in order to have superior weaponry and numbers.

Sometimes you have to make due with less for whatever reason. That's where this stuff comes in.

bjj is a poor tool for fighting. Ridiculously so. Takes years to be any good. Yeah I bring a gun to the theater, most everywhere. I don't eat with my hands...humans use tools, why would I fight with them? People who are constantly in fights have issues
 
bjj is a poor tool for fighting. Ridiculously so. Takes years to be any good. Yeah I bring a gun to the theater, most everywhere. I don't eat with my hands...humans use tools, why would I fight with them? People who are constantly in fights have issues

You defending yourself with a carry pistol against a guy in armor with a rifle would be an example of practical training and the ability to stay calm under pressure prevailing over superior weaponry, not the other way around.

I know that you've already said that your carry pistol is the minimum level of weapon you use no matter what the situation because you just pistol whip people with it.
 
O
bjj is a poor tool for fighting. Ridiculously so. Takes years to be any good. Yeah I bring a gun to the theater, most everywhere. I don't eat with my hands...humans use tools, why would I fight with them? People who are constantly in fights have issues

Crap, I think we have a jhon rambo with us...

so if you are in a theather and you ahve an argument for a stupid thing with someone, you are shooting the guy? Lol...
 
A dude just shot up a theater...all this crap about "effectiveness" is nonsensical. Real fighting is about weapons and numbers

No, but a person that trains can get the f' out of the theater faster than an untrained person.
 
bjj is a poor tool for fighting. Ridiculously so. Takes years to be any good. Yeah I bring a gun to the theater, most everywhere. I don't eat with my hands...humans use tools, why would I fight with them? People who are constantly in fights have issues

I agree. From my personal experience, wrestling served me well when I got into street fights.

Take down, ground and pound, then friends jump in, blah blah blah...

If you want to test out your therories in street fighting, just go play basketball at your local park, call BS fouls and start running your mouth.
 
No, but a person that trains can get the f' out of the theater faster than an untrained person.

why BC u can make a hole in the wall? Ur an idiot, man. Ppl.stacked up at the exits like they always do in a panic and he shot them. He didn't have a rifle did he?
 
O

Crap, I think we have a jhon rambo with us...

so if you are in a theather and you ahve an argument for a stupid thing with someone, you are shooting the guy? Lol...

I dont get in a lot of arguments in real life. The interwebz is for that
 
why BC u can make a hole in the wall? Ur an idiot, man. Ppl.stacked up at the exits like they always do in a panic and he shot them. He didn't have a rifle did he?

Stop trolling me man. But I'll bite.

A well train person has more stamina and strength to move. You're more likely to survive in a dangerous situation being in shape than not.

I can't believe I had to type that out....
 
Stop trolling me man. But I'll bite.

A well train person has more stamina and strength to move. You're more likely to survive in a dangerous situation being in shape than not.

I can't believe I had to type that out....

yeah ur wrong. Ppl who survived were just lucky. Stamina and strength are fking useless when the exits are jammed full of ppl. Actually sitting still was the highest probability option. The exits are only good if you can get out first and that depends upon the luck you came in with
 
yeah ur wrong. Ppl who survived were just lucky. Stamina and strength are fking useless when the exits are jammed full of ppl. Actually sitting still was the highest probability option. The exits are only good if you can get out first and that depends upon the luck you came in with

Right.......... :rolleyes:

I disagree with you. We'll just have to leave it at that.
 
Back
Top