And hanging around wearing red with a bunch of people wearing red. Homeless might be a step up.
Damn!!! What a beautiful jab and straight! Out cold!
Rocky Lockridge (born January 30, 1959) is an American former boxer. As a professional, he is best known for handing Roger Mayweather his first defeat
Lockridge was one of many elite fighters who got their start out of the tacoma boxing club not far from seattle. this is certainly at least a corrective to him crying on national tv. i really dont know what gets into men, when they know you call yourself a fighter suddenly they think they can trump 10 20 years of training by being a knucklehead, happens all the time.
Lockridge was actually a beast. He gave prime JCC a close fight and was arguably robbed against Wilfredo Gomez. He also knocked out an unbeaten Roger (who was also a beast) in a round.
at the time, the gomez fight was seen as blatant robbery but with time people forget and accept those kinds of decisions. that era had a ton of talent in the vicinity of 135, just a ton lots of the best matchups never even happened or at least happened at the wrong time. Honestly, i cannot think of an era with more raw talent per division than the eighties lightweights, and the guys who fought a division above or below that.
I was and am a camacho fan, the macho of the early eighties was better than hed ever be and I just thought he was god, couldnt see anyone beating him, he was calling out salvador sanchez after his first couple fights, in those years, before he lost his balls, macho should have been pfp and king of the lightweight division. Oh the talent weve lost to drugs, drink and crazy women.
True, but if you removed that self destructive streak that marred his later life and career he wouldn't have been Macho Camacho. Same goes for Tapia too.
It was an incredible era and this was with maybe the greatest talent of them all dying at the age of 23.
may be true, vinny paz and others say how you fight is how you live, meaning fast but his fighting style changed to safety first. most say the rosario fight changed him but he was getting involved into the fast life before that. when a fighter gets that distracted in an era like that hes lucky anyone ever heard of him again. I personally think he got a few bucks in his pocket and liked the celebrity more than the fighting. the result was a fighter with decent punching power to go along with the fastest hands weve ever seen was reduced to a guy who went 15 fights after his move up to lightweight without a real knockout and when he did start knocking out guys it was not the type of guys who should have even been in the ring with him. he lost his mean streak. it was actually shocking to see his early fights where he runs around the ref to belt a downed opponent and hits another with street slaps when he has him down. good and nasty in the best possible way, that was the real macho.
Salvador Sanchez was truly gifted no doubt, But his supremacy was at 126. He was to strong, Durable, skilled etc. for smaller men like Nelson and Gomez. At the time of Sanchez death AA was in his physical prime, And a three division champ at 126, 130, 135. At that time Arguello was undoubtedly the greater talent (Bigger, Better, More Accomplished). And yes, If they had fought Arguello would have beat sanchez. Alexis was a good three inches taller and rangier than Salvador. As the saying goes, "A good big man, beats a good little man".
Salvador Sanchez was truly gifted no doubt, But his supremacy was at 126. He was to strong, Durable, skilled etc. for smaller men like Nelson and Gomez. At the time of Sanchez death AA was in his physical prime, And a three division champ at 126, 130, 135. At that time Arguello was undoubtedly the greater talent (Bigger, Better, More Accomplished). And yes, If they had fought Arguello would have beat sanchez. Alexis was a good three inches taller and rangier than Salvador. As the saying goes, "A good big man, beats a good little man".
I first seen Macho Camacho when he fought Oscar. I was only 9 then and watched it with my dad. I was amazed a few years later when I watched his earlier fights; couldn't really get my head around that it was the same guy. Can't deny he had balls to still be fighting guys like Oscar by that point, but he could have been one of the greats.
Funnily enough Bobby Chacon is one of my all time favourites and I've often wished we'd gotten a Chacon/Macho fight. (I say "we" when I wasn't even born when they were around the same weight class but you know what I mean!)
and oh yeah, chacon gave up his title rather than to fight macho, it was a smart business move, if not a Macho thing to do. its ironic because most of the boxing mags saw a lot of chacon in camacho and the big question was would camacho throw away his talent like bobby did and as we know he did. at the time though? chacon was done as a fighter, winning fights on guts, he would have needed more than that for a good young fighter, mancini tore him apart in two rounds and we all know boom boom was not a major talent.
I can understand why Chacon vacated the belt and moved up rather than take on Macho at that time; it makes sense considering his best days were behind him and Camacho was a beast at that point. It's just disappointing to look back and think that fight could have happened.
Chacon's a strange one. You don't really read about him throwing away his talent these days; hell, you don't really read about him these days. I suspect he gets a pass from a lot of people due to the exciting fights he was in over the years.