- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 72,112
- Reaction score
- 51,608
Are we really going to argue that almost 60% of Americans have no fiscal sense at all?
In a country where materialism is king? It's not a stretch.
Are we really going to argue that almost 60% of Americans have no fiscal sense at all?
In a country where materialism is king? It's not a stretch.
I’m for a lot of social programs.
but there are so many ignorant fucktards out there. I can’t fathom how in the fuck you cant have $500 saved up.
ignorant stupidity should not be rewarded. These people are either dumb, or made horrible life decisions.
the only people I feel for are the medical poor. It’s awful and almost criminal. Something needs to change there.
I’m for a lot of social programs.
but there are so many ignorant fucktards out there. I can’t fathom how in the fuck you cant have $500 saved up.
ignorant stupidity should not be rewarded. These people are either dumb, or made horrible life decisions.
the only people I feel for are the medical poor. It’s awful and almost criminal. Something needs to change there.
lol, these are exactly who we should let choose our next president or governorSurprised but it's true, and even worse than the OP claim ($400), according to the Federal Reserve:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/10-americ...0-emergency-expense-federal/story?id=63253846
Medical costs are a huge part of this.
And 25% are immune?
I assume there's an explanation for the middle 15%? Are they in the materialism group or the immune from materialism group?
I'm wondering because you're the 2nd person to claim "materialism" without anything to tie the two together.No, they can just afford to be a little irresponsible. They actually have "disposable income".
Again, if you can afford it, it's not going to effect your savings much, when put in a chart like that.
Nobody is immune to materialism. I don't know where you got that from. It comes down to living within your means. Some can afford to spend boatloads of money on bullshit. Some can't. The people who can't however, are still doing it though. This isn't complicated.
It's always so weird to me that people refuse (or are unable?) to see that 'there's something in the water' when a national problem hits a level like this. Do we not talk about large systems enough in school or something? I just can't comprehend that people don't comprehend it.It's not surprising. I don't think people realize just how hard it is to live on minimum wage or in some of the more expensive cities. People can criticize their savings, which is fair, but only to a degree. 57% of Americans have less than $1000.
Are we really going to argue that almost 60% of Americans have no fiscal sense at all? I doubt it, there is obviously a systemic issue somewhere when a country this wealthy has such poor savings rate.
Look at the 2 biggest groups - people will $0 and people with $10,000+. Does that make sense? A normal distribution would put the highest percentages in the middle with the ends being the smallest, we have the opposite. Why?
I agree I think people themselves are a large part of the problem. My wife is poor she doesn't make shit compared to me. She wants to try and have another kid and it's been hell explaining to her that we can't afford it. She see's how much I'm saving every paycheck and she thinks we can just use all that money and it's no big deal. Concepts like retirement and emergency funds don't even seem to be a concern for her. On top of that she see's her friends make these poor decisions and thinks "Well how can they do it?". My first response is well what does their retirement account look like? How much do they have set aside for emergencies?.
She recently got a brand new car and was willing to spend way more then I knew she could afford just to get it. Luckily it came up much cheaper than we initially thought but she was ready and willing to make another poor financial decision.
Almost any job b I could get doesn't pay shit, because of my record. The legal system fucks over so many people
So let me get this straight, in the richest country in the history of the world, people should work themselves to the bone for 10 years straight, living at the absolute minimum, never indulge or treat themselves just so they could scrape together a grand a year? Not only is this completely unreasonable, it's completely unrealistic. What happens if they get sick? What happens if they need a car to get to work and it breaks down? What happens if they want to send their children to college? What happens if they get laid off? What happens if a family member gets sick? So on. There's a million things that could happen to prevent someone from being able to scrape by on a shit salary.Yes they think that way and that's why they'll always be fucked.... but they are wrong. Even if a person found themselves in a minimum wage job a series of winning decisions could land them in a much better spot in the future.
On a basic level if you make a shitty income you should avoid all unnecessary spending. By cutting your spending drastically you could easily save up a grand a year. Over the course of ten years, if you invested that money you'll have 15k at least. That's a great emergency fund.
Now imagine, keeping your spending the same but getting a part time 2nd job that pays a measly 150 a week. That's 7500 bucks a year banked. Add that to the grand you could already save and you'll have a down payment for a 2 family home plus an emergency fund in under 5 years.
Obviously there are a series of bigger life choices that can help or hurt your ability to do this.
Who you pick as a partner.
If you decide to have unprotected sex and end up pregnant.
Your ambition level....your hobby should be applying and interviewing for better paying jobs. You should be the best employee and constantly look for promotions.
Time and decisions are incredible things. The wrong decision multiplied by 10 years will find yourself deep in debt with very few options. The correct choices when multiplied by 10 years will turn your life around. People need to learn this in order to succeed and get out of that statistic. They don't need to be enabled with a handout and victim status
We aren't all played the same hand. Some people aren't even given enough cards. Some people aren't even allowed to the table.
"but poor people have sneakers!"And 25% are immune?
I assume there's an explanation for the middle 15%? Are they in the materialism group or the immune from materialism group?
"but poor people have sneakers!"
Meanwhile the top 20% spend tens of thousands of dollars a year on traveling, art, furniture, restaurants, clothes and more. It's easy to save money if you use $100.000 dollars a year on spending and still have $50.000 in savings, while at the same time can afford accountants to handle your finances.
Top 20%
Bottom 20% (spends a larger percentage of their income on food, housing and healthcare)