So we apparently want to reduce the debt but are adding more than 20 trillion over the next years?
Is this what you wanted? To pay more in tax but actually receiving less because they are gutting all your benefits so they get richer?
The mental gymnastics the supposed debt hawks in here will be going through in this thread will be entertaining. It was never about the debt, though. This whole DOGE charade was always about selling huge tax cuts to the rich while gutting our social safety nets. It's disgusting, but MAGA is just that.
So we apparently want to reduce the debt but are adding more than 20 trillion over the next years?
Is this what you wanted? To pay more in tax but actually receiving less because they are gutting all your benefits so they get richer?
So we apparently want to reduce the debt but are adding more than 20 trillion over the next years?
Is this what you wanted? To pay more in tax but actually receiving less because they are gutting all your benefits so they get richer?
Aren't they cutting medicaid and food stamps to pay for the tax cuts for the top 1%?
They are Republicans after all.
By "cutting" we mean essentially eliminating.
And let's not make a mistake. This will absolutely kill Ameeican citizens. A majority of disabled people are on medicaid. They're f*cked. 2/3 of people in nursing homes are on medicaid. They're f*cked.
There was once a term used by corporatists who courted the Burgoisie to rule in Government...it was "unproductive eaters"...also "useless eaters." Lebensunwertes Leben, "life unworthy of life."
This is that philosophy institutionalized. If you cannot work, get f*cked and die. And if you can work and you're not in the top 5% of wealthy people, then you are taxed so they can enjoy tax cuts and subsidies.
To be fair, my understanding is they haven't explicitly said they'll cut 880 billion from Medicaid or 230 billion from SNAP, but they did reject any amendments that would prevent such cuts. There also isn't really another line item they could take it from given the departments they've charged with making the cuts. They also plan to expand military spending.
To be fair, my understanding is they haven't explicitly said they'll cut 880 billion from Medicaid or 230 billion from SNAP, but they did reject any amendments that would prevent such cuts. There also isn't really another line item they could take it from given the departments they've charged with making the cuts. They also plan to expand military spending.
Aren't they cutting medicaid and food stamps to pay for the tax cuts for the top 1%?
They are Republicans after all.
There's no way to get 2 trillion in cuts without cutting from Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, or the military.
That's 80% of our budget alone, even if you cut the entire 20% remaining it's not even close to the $2T target.
Also, eliminating SNAP will have a dramatic effect up the economy. Businesses everywhere rely deeply on SNAP money being spent in their stores880 Billion has to come from line items under the jurisdiction of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and 230 billion has to come from items under the jurisdiction of the House Committee on Agriculture.
So there really aren't other big ticket items to target besides Medicaid and SNAP.
Also, eliminating SNAP will have a dramatic effect up the economy. Businesses everywhere rely deeply on SNAP money being spent in their stores
Don't forget the farmers.Also, eliminating SNAP will have a dramatic effect up the economy. Businesses everywhere rely deeply on SNAP money being spent in their stores
the thing they loathe the most is Communism (communism meaning literally any notion of wealth-redistribution).
Fixed your liesNothing creates communists as fast as the current modern day social media influencer / follower dichotomy the younger generations are being manipulated by
military cuts are on the table.
military cuts are on the table.