International 248 people, 66 children Palestinian dead after "Apartheid state" Israel launches airstrikes in Gaza

"not targeting civilian structures". You have proof of that ? No.

Here's a school that has been bombed by your israeli friends yesterday :



yeah yeah i know it's because Hamas uses kids as shields ! In a SCHOOL of course. So let's bomb it.

Just freakin imagine if Palestinians did that how would the outrage be

Huh? What alternate reality are you living in? Hamas primarily targets civilians and essential infrastructure all the time, they’re just not very successful because of the Iron Dome. You don’t seem very outraged to me.

And if Hamas (or Islamic Jihad) fires rockets from schools or hospitals? Are the rockets or those firing the rockets no longer legitimate military targets? Are the militants choosing to fire from those places also not to blame for using human shields?
 
Last edited:
"not targeting civilian structures". You have proof of that ? No.

Here's a school that has been bombed by your israeli friends yesterday :



yeah yeah i know it's because Hamas uses kids as shields ! In a SCHOOL of course. So let's bomb it.

Just freakin imagine if Palestinians did that how would the outrage be


Thats kinda ironic you would say that seeing howt an israeli school was hit by rockets yesterday.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...hit-by-rocket-in-ashkelon-home-hit-in-ashdod/
 
Are you implying that attacking innocent bystanders and burning down synagogues as danniaain mentioned is justified, Kafir?
No I didn't, sure why you would think that. Also a bit funny that you're answering my question with a question just like the Palestinian guy.
 
Last edited:
I sympathize with Palestinians but I am not a fan of answering a question with a question while dodging the one asked of you.

Even if the question is asked in such a manner as to be leading, offensive, or a set up?

To be clear, I'm addressing your general statement now, and am not specifically responding with regards to the content of the OP.

I mean, I do get what you're saying, and it's often an annoyance when people do that, as they can be ducking; however, sometimes it's called for and makes a valid point, despite being a question (while simultaneously being kind of an answer) - which is basically my point. When dealing with a dishonest org like CNN, I see it as fair game.
 
Last edited:
Its not? Can you elaborate?
I kinda meant the whole picture of the conflict. But also Sheikh Jarrah specifically. I think the actions of the radical right Israelis there are atrocious, but still its not a simple situation. The palestinians living there were never the owners of the land which was most probably acquired by jews like a century ago and were forcibly evicted by the British, but I think it is a huge atrocity evicting people who have lived there for decades and built there their home. And if the manifestations against the decision were peaceful and logical I'd support them, but they started attacking random Jews, burning down synagogues and municipal buildings and lynching people.
As a side note, if we accept that evicting people that lived in a certain place for decades is wrong regardless how they settled there, what does that say about the Jewish setllers?
 
No I didn't not, sure why you would think that. Also a bit funny that you're answering my question with a question just like the Palestinian guy.

Your question wasn't directed toward me last time I checked - but it seems like you are liking a lot of posts justifying Hamas' activity including intentional targeting of Israel's civilian population, and you have certainly demonstrated a hesitancy in criticizing their activity.
 


BLM style people are now vouching for the Palestinian cause. This Israel supporter just learned his not on the protected menu anymore. Cops didn’t even arrest the people who attacked him. We shouldn’t have normalized violence.

give me all of life’s irony. I will take heaping bowl fulls of it right now. Delicious delicious irony.

no violence should be tolerated, but now segments of america tolerate it all day.

why isnt he wearing a mask?
 
I kinda meant the whole picture of the conflict. But also Sheikh Jarrah specifically. I think the actions of the radical right Israelis there are atrocious, but still its not a simple situation. The palestinians living there were never the owners of the land which was most probably acquired by jews like a century ago and were forcibly evicted by the British, but I think it is a huge atrocity evicting people who have lived there for decades and built there their home. And if the manifestations against the decision were peaceful and logical I'd support them, but they started attacking random Jews, burning down synagogues and municipal buildings and lynching people.
Would an Israeli court allow Palestinians to evict a Jewish family that occupied their home after they were evicted? Seems like it only goes one way.
As a side note, if we accept that evicting people that lived in a certain place for decades is wrong regardless how they settled there, what does that say about the Jewish setllers?
Idk, what would the Israelis courts say about that? Would they afford the evicted Palestinians the same right to return as the Jews are being afforded in Sheikh Jarrah?
Your question wasn't directed toward me last time I checked - but it seems like you are liking a lot of posts justifying Hamas' activity including intentional targeting of Israel's civilian population, and you have certainly demonstrated a hesitancy in criticizing their activity.
I guess by that logic any Jew who doesn't criticze the IDF's excesses and those of the radical settler populations should be suspected of supporting ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. Or maybe we could hold people to account for what they've actually said.
 
Would an Israeli court allow Palestinians to evict a Jewish family that occupied their home after they were evicted? Seems like it only goes one way.

Idk, what would the Israelis courts say about that? Would they afford the evicted Palestinians the same right to return as the Jews are being afforded in Sheikh Jarrah?

I guess by that logic any Jew who doesn't criticze the IDF's excesses and those of the radical settler populations should be suspected of supporting ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. Or maybe we could hold people to account for what they've actually said.
Homie, you like posts supporting Hamas' activity and even now when pressed on your opinion - you avoid answering.
Obviously the Sheich Jarrah situation is fucked up and represents systemic injustice and racism but I can't take that as justification for huge rocket salvos over a civilian population.
 
It is not as simple as that and you know it.
And in any worldview, what would attacking innocent bystanders and burning down synagogues accomplish besides more bloodshed?

Yeah cool hypothetical scenario. Now in the actual reality : what does attacking innocent bystanders, what israeli do everyday, and burning the Holy for muslims Masjid Al Aqsa and throwing tear gas grenade in it accomplish ?
 
Homie, you like posts supporting Hamas' activity and even now when pressed on your opinion - you avoid answering.
Obviously the Sheich Jarrah situation is fucked up and represents systemic injustice and racism but I can't take that as justification for huge rocket salvos over a civilian population.
Which post did I like that is bothering you so much?
 
Chain deflections going on here...
Deflecting from what? You're claiming that I liked a problematic post so I am asking which one so I can explain why I liked it. If you can produce one I'll be happy to explain. If I don't even know what you're talking about its hard for me to address the issue.
 
Would an Israeli court allow Palestinians to evict a Jewish family that occupied their home after they were evicted? Seems like it only goes one way.
.

It does happen yes, for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amona,_Mateh_Binyamin
Of course I'm not saying it happens all the time or the the situation is just or fair, I just said that it wasnt as simple as was presented ITT.

Idk, what would the Israelis courts say about that? Would they afford the evicted Palestinians the same right to return as the Jews are being afforded in Sheikh Jarrah?
.

Depends what you mean by `right of return`. The Palestinians in East Jerusalem have the opportunity to receive an israeli citizenship and become equal rights ciizens of Israel, they refuse to do so on a moral basis.
 
Back
Top