International 248 people, 66 children Palestinian dead after "Apartheid state" Israel launches airstrikes in Gaza

hamas-rockets-2014.jpg
Most of them being fired are the smaller ones.
 


Perhaps Palestinian Terrorists should have considered this when they targeted Israeli schools and residential areas with rocket attacks.

Perhaps they did, and the collateral damage would be used for headlines across the world to point blame at Israel.

MSM, Democrats, Hamas, & Entire Islamic World all have the same 5 word message...

"The Jews Are To Blame."

MSM? Haha

MSM is all over the Jews cock... Where have you been sleeping all these decades?
 
And it's hardly surprising when they are met with extreme force in response. There are winners and losers all around the world. Powerful and weak. If Palestine wants to keep fucking around with their superiors, watch what happens. I'm certainly not gonna lose any sleep over it, as their conflict is a little more complicated than "Big guys bad, little guys good".
So essentially you are fine with might makes right.
 
It’s just too bad Egypt and Jordan won’t take their trash back.
Palestinians are native to what is now Israel. It is most Israelis who aren't native. I'm sure you and all the other rightwing Israel bootlikcers would be just as accomadating of Zionists if they decided to come and kick you out of your home and take it, then keep their boot on you and your kinfolk for decades.
 
Israel doesn't want Palestinians to have a State, so it's a moot point arguing about Palestinians having Jews in their State.

They've offered a two state solution in the past and whenever the Palestinians refused the Israelis have annexed more and more land. They really need to go to the table and accept whatever they can get at this point. Israel is going no-where and the cycle of the Palestinians getting their asses kicked and then losing more land is not going to end.
 
They've offered a two state solution in the past and whenever the Palestinians refused the Israelis have annexed more and more land. They really need to go to the table and accept whatever they can get at this point. Israel is going no-where and the Palestinians continually getting their asses kicked and then losing more land will not end.
They were never serious about a 2 state solution. It was all just theatre . The Palestinians asked for a return to the 67 borders and right of return to which Israel refused.

Ultimately Israel will be forced to accept the West Bank Palestinians into an Israeli state, unless they feel they can ethnically cleanse them and get away with it, which would require a degree of subservience and fealty from the West not seen yet.
 
They were never serious about a 2 state solution. It was all just theatre . The Palestinians asked for a return to the 67 borders and right of return to which Israel refused.

Ultimately Israel will be forced to accept the West Bank Palestinians into an Israeli state, unless they feel they can ethnically cleanse them and get away with it, which would require a degree of subservience and fealty from the West not seen yet.

It was the Palestinians that rejected the 2 state solutions in the past. As long as Likud is in power they will expand the settlements, crush any uprising, rinse and repeat till they get all the land that they want. They'll leave Gaza to the Palestinians as its too much trouble and not as important as Jerusalem and the West Bank. The Palestinians need to take whatever they can get now before it gets any worse.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-palestinians-israel-idUSLC6231820080812

olmertmap_r.jpg


“The Israeli proposal is not acceptable,” Abbas’s spokesman said. “The Palestinian side will only accept a Palestinian state with territorial continuity, with holy Jerusalem as its capital, without settlements, and on the June 4, 1967 boundaries.”
 
The attacks, on Israel, keep coming.



How dare they defend themselves from mass slaughter.
 
It was the Palestinians that rejected the 2 state solutions in the past. As long as Likud is in power they will expand the settlements, crush any uprising, rinse and repeat till they get all the land that they want. They'll leave Gaza to the Palestinians as its too much trouble and not as important as Jerusalem and the West Bank. The Palestinians need to take whatever they can get now before it gets any worse.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-palestinians-israel-idUSLC6231820080812

olmertmap_r.jpg


“The Israeli proposal is not acceptable,” Abbas’s spokesman said. “The Palestinian side will only accept a Palestinian state with territorial continuity, with holy Jerusalem as its capital, without settlements, and on the June 4, 1967 boundaries.”

Israel was never going to give up the settlements, which meant Israel was never going to give Palestinians a State of their own since there is no way to give them a State and keep the patchwork of settlements.

Best thing for Palestinians is to call for a single state, this will either expose Israel for the racist State it is or they will have to give up Jewish spremacy in favor of a democracy.
 
Israel was never going to give up the settlements, which meant Israel was never going to give Palestinians a State of their own since there is no way to give them a State and keep the patchwork of settlements.

Best thing for Palestinians is to call for a single state, this will either expose Israel for the racist State it is or they will have to give up Jewish spremacy in favor of a democracy.

Olmert's plan said otherwise, they were going to trade land for the settlements they wanted to keep (did you see the map?). Abbas rejected it and wouldn't negotiate any thing less than the 1967 borders.
 
Olmert's plan said otherwise, they were going to trade land for the settlements they wanted to keep (did you see the map?). Abbas rejected it and wouldn't negotiate any thing less than the 1967 borders.
He did not agree to the right of return. Many Palestinians who were cleansed from Israel , and their descendants, are languising in refugee camps .

One State is really the only viable solution right now. There are soo many settlements in the West Bank, that you can't make a Palestinian State there. But Israel is afraid of losing Jewish hegemony, so they keep delaying and expanding settlements. They probably think they can just push all the West Bank Palestinians into Jordan. But that seems unlikely. So they seem to be ok with the status quo of no Palestinian State and gradually expanding settlements.
 
MSM? Haha

MSM is all over the Jews cock... Where have you been sleeping all these decades?

Sure it does, bro.

https://www.jns.org/opinion/why-does-the-new-york-times-incessantly-attack-israel/

"According to David Bernstein, president and CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the Times holds “a decided institutional bias” against Israel. This was after his organization researched 107 editorials on Israel and Jews published in the Times since 2016."

"The situation has become so extreme that opinion editor Bari Weiss, one of the few openly Zionist voices employed by the Times in recent years, felt forced to resign in July 2020 because of harassment. According to Weiss, her colleagues called her a “Nazi” and “racist,” and intimated that she wrote too many “Jewish stories.”

"The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) has long chronicled the Times’s bias against Israel. In a study undertaken in 2011, CAMERA found a “disproportionate, continuous, embedded indictment of Israel that dominates both news and commentary sections. Israeli views are downplayed while Palestinian perspectives, especially criticism of Israel, are amplified and even promoted.” The net effect, states the report, “is an overarching message, woven into the fabric of NYT coverage, of Israeli fault and responsibility for the conflict.”

"Two of the authors of that study, senior CAMERA analysts Ricki Hollander and Gilead Ini, explained the paper’s tactics: “Without employing the type of crude incitement against Israelis that is rampant in Palestinian society, the NYT poisons the public’s mind against Israel by shaping the perception of the Jewish state as responsible for many, if not most, of the region’s ills.”

"While Beinart has long described himself as a “liberal Zionist,” it is clear this has always been a fig leaf for more sinister views. As global communications director for the American Jewish Committee (AJC), Avi Mayer tweeted in response to the article, “Let’s be clear: you’re no friend of the Jews if you deny us our right to self-determination and you’re not a liberal Zionist if you want Israel to disappear.”


So, go ahead @PulsingJones, by all means post examples of MSM being 'all over the Jews cock...' as you so describe, or else we'll figure the rest is anti-Israel bias.
 
Back
Top