Elections 2016 GOP/Democratic March 15th Primaries

[NelmarksGhost]

except some people in that group have to generate the money....do you still live with your parents?

who do you support in the election?

No I don't live with my parents. I left home at 16. People generate money in all sorts of ways. Through inheritances, gifts, insurance payouts, and some labor for it.

I'm probably not going to vote since it won't matter anyway. A candidates "tax plan" really doesn't matter as the president isn't in charge of that sort of thing.

 

[NelmarksGhost]

This has such a great theme:

 

[GearSolidMetal]

They said it was impossible for anyone to ever win Ohio. Well, I said I was gonna win Ohio, because it's the most important step in becoming president. You have to win Ohio. They said no one could do it, and I did it. I won Ohio. Just like I said I would. And now Ohio's been won. Donald Trump didn't win Ohio. I did. I won Ohio.

And that's the only thing you won.

And that's the only thing you will win.

 

[DragRacer]

I don't either. I've literally never met a single person that supported her. While I'm all for Trump a looootttttt of folks I know and have met were for Bernie. Hillary is what establishment corporate politics is attempting to shove down our throats and it's disgusting.

I dont believe Bernie is losing against clinton. im calling fraud.

 

[Doughbelly]

I think a lot of Democrats, especially the Democratic establishment are seriously and heavily underestimating the strength of Trump's candidacy and his potential against Hillary.

Once Trump switches gears from dog whistle politics set up by the Republican Southern Strategy to hammering the loss of jobs, stagnation of prosperity, economics, trade policy, etc (which are the issues that Sanders is doing a good job of putting up a decent enough fight against Hillary), you're going to see a very close race. Hillary's basic stance is that everything is fine when at a deep level, a lot of Americans don't think everything is fine.

The more I think about it, the more I like Trump's chances. That's if the Republicans don't split the party.

 

[StannisTheMannis]

people are not going to stand in line for 4hours to vote for hilary its not happening. People will stand in line for Bernie or Trump.

 

[DragRacer]

 

[DragRacer]

Bernie gets some serious love too

 

[Frank23]

 

[DragRacer]

Lol

Douche duo

 

[andnowweknow]

well then you are a fanatic. You claim Clinton is only winning because of the 'south' I then mention to you the non-southern states she won and how NY, PA, MD, and NJ are all favorable states for her based off the demographics and her connections in NY, NJ and even PA and you ignore this.

You're still wrong.

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

The fact that Hillary won any States is fucking disgusting. I haven't been this disappointed in Americans since GW's second term.

 

[KnightTemplar]

The fact that Hillary won any States is fucking disgusting. I haven't been this disappointed in Americans since GW's second term.

Get used to it. This is Hilary's election to lose.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I'm not going to get in a thread derailing debate with you, just going to take a moment to call you out on your bullshit again.

What bullshit? Everything I said is true, and I intended for it to be true. None of your whining is relevant to anything, and your silly attacks on Obama just add to my point. You don't care or even know about policy, but you go with what is "cool."

 

[panamaican]

You're still wrong.

Then explain it.

 

[TheStruggle]

Get used to it. This is Hilary's election to lose.

Sadly this is true

 

[TheStruggle]

Sanders is going to start putting his efforts behind Clinton's campaign

 

[andnowweknow]

Then explain it.

Margins in particular States, southern ones. I love this playing dumb thing. I also should have mentioned she was essentially guaranteed the nomination prior to a single vote being cast based on superdelegates.

"It's her time" even though she's a shit candidate getting elected in Nov based on name value alone...well with a dash of the fact the other side is going to elect the unelectable.

 

[ShadowRun]

No, they're not basically the same.

Hillary's your standard Democratic dove who wants to impose domination with a few coordinated attacks here and there. Obviously this is still criminal and should be condemned, BUT the other option is much more destructive.

You have to choose one. Option Hillary is basically a continuation of Obama with some drone attacks and a few troop deployments here and there. Option Trump will likely lead us to a return to the Dubya years. Those aren't basically the same.

I was talking about the definition of chickenhawk vs warhawk , so don't comment unless you aren't following along. A no fly zone that Hilary wants is different than Obama.

 

[panamaican]

Margins in particular States, southern ones. I love this playing dumb thing. I also should have mentioned she was essentially guaranteed the nomination prior to a single vote being cast based on superdelegates.

"It's her time" even though she's a shit candidate getting elected in Nov based on name value alone...well with a dash of the fact the other side is going to elect the unelectable.

I guess you're going to have to flesh it out for me. Most of the large states that have had their primaries so far are in the South so the leader would always have been strong in the South. You can't be winning in states that haven't had their elections yet. What am I missing here?