** 2016 Election Day Discussion **

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 457759
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
AEMD said:
u sound like u took ur wife to harlem for your honeymoon
Click to expand...
Honestly in all the years on Sherdog, that is the lamest insult I have ever seen.
Step your troll game up son.
 
Trump with 73% in Georgia according to CNN, not sure what the scare is if freaking CNN is saying that
 
Am I correct in assuming that early numbers usually come from more rural areas? Implying stronger Trump support ?
 
Trump victory party has a cash bar.

That may be the most offensive thing he has done this election.
 
JDragon said:
Am I correct in assuming that early numbers usually come from more rural areas? Implying stronger Trump support ?
Click to expand...
yeah been rural counties pretty much everywhere so far. Really big shit is yet to come.
 
good thing is - election is basically over on the east coast. Once you can some what call Penn, Fl, OH, MIch I can go to me DVR .
 
Clinton with 50k lead in Florida with 30% reporting.
 
JDragon said:
Am I correct in assuming that early numbers usually come from more rural areas? Implying stronger Trump support ?
Click to expand...
Yes. Same thing happened in the primaries, which would show Bernie ahead.

Then urban areas come in and he got crushed.
 
A lot of false hope early amongst Trump supporters LOL.
 
Trump losing the precint where his golf course is in Florida would be hilarious. Something that would rustle him so bad
 
Fawlty said:
Foolish stuff. Silver is about the only guy out there making concession to the uncertainty of Trump populism in this election, and has been consistent and cautious since the end of the primaries. It's hilarious how his opinion is dismissed by you guys, yet he's the only important guy who gives weight to your side of the argument.
Click to expand...
I had enough math courses at university to understand what he's doing and that it's not nonsense per se. I don't complain about him being biased.
Maybe it's the best methodology, given the situation. But that's worthless if the produced results swing around like a pendulum.
That's simply the point where statistics don't help in real life. His analysis -while "scientifically" correct- say about nothing at all.
Today he tweeted: " Basically, these 3 cases are equally likely a—Solid Clinton win b—Epic Clinton blowout c—Close call, Trump *probably* wins Elect. Coll."
Yeah great Nate and what does that tell us? That's a good way of saying based on my current methodology I have no fucking clue what happens - just like every other dumbass who doesn't look at data at all.
 
Wheelin, dealin, Monica Lewinsky kiss (& a whole lot more) stealing, stylin, profilin, jet flying, America's one & only WOOOOOOOOOO true hope. The amount of fuckery is too damn high. Go with Ric Flair. Make America WOOOOOOOO Again.

ZpRL8_s-200x150.gif


raw


tumblr_o4vzz8nY7x1vn5u0to1_500.gif
 
lecter said:
Nate Plastic almost literately changes his opinion on the election every 30 minutes. Since the both candidates were nominated he predicted every somehow possible or impossible scenario as the most likely one.
Click to expand...

Not really I have been getting his daily for last few months and has basically followed the trends but weighted slightly more for trump. In any event his comment is hardly controversial here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,956
Messages
58,330,868
Members
176,002
Latest member
Shock7

Share this page

Back
Top