I'll take whatever freebies being passed around the threadWhat you need homie?
Vyvanse son.
It was an accurate post I feel. I just skipped the formal reply and said what I felt that poster truly was trying to say.
What I said is accurate. Anung was trying to deflect a truthful statement about how some people claim that black voters are too uneducated to know what is in their own best interests.
Anung replied by posting an article which just elaborated on the lie that the poor, minorities can't think for themselves. I then followed up mentioning the fact that he (Anung) a self proclaimed Bernie fan has admitted he would vote against Liberal interests of it meant not voting for Clinton.
What you need homie?
Not to mention demoralizing their entire base.I think the GOP idea that they go into a contested convention and ditch Trump then is a suicidal fantasy.
Trump would do the opposite of taking that like a good soldier.
i would never in my life vote for that crazy fucking bitch.
Anybody but Shillary. Anybody.....
I think the GOP idea that they go into a contested convention and ditch Trump then is a suicidal fantasy.
Trump would do the opposite of taking that like a good soldier.
If tonight is any indication of how this will play out that's directly where this ship is headed; straight into that iceberg.Not to mention demoralizing their entire base.
Trump will be the next president. I cant in my wildest dreams imagine the US citizens are that fucking idiotic to vote that dumb cunt into office.
![]()
Exactly like Drumf....only difference? Dolan doesnt hide itKinda like Drumpf?
If tonight is any indication of how this will play out that's directly where this ship is headed; straight into that iceberg.
They haven't been all that fair to Bernie in this election, either. It shouldn't be hard to find a roll call of prominent liberal economists skeptical about Bernie's economic policy projections for growth, yet they resorted to quoting people in that hit piece that weren't even economists by trade. That's...disappointing.Lol @ 'Journalistic Integrity' at the NYT.
Remember when they made a front page story of an anonymous source saying McCain cheated on his wife?
And that's just the #1 example off the top of my head.
He isn't. It's impossible for Trump supporters to claim anything positive, comparatively, about him. He answer "yes" and "no" in the same sentence. However shapeless Hillary is she actually has a record, and she has a history of rhetoric couched in experience and knowledge.Like i said earlier. Donald Trump is better than Hillary. What does that say about her?
@Gandhi - but Hillary's civil rights record is not as strong as Sanders'. And when you blame Sanders for people not knowing who he is, isn't that just another way of saying "uninformed voter"? Even if you're aware of him but just listen to what gets dished out, you're still just an uninformed voter.
As for the poor supporting the more liberal, I don't feel it's that simple. For one thing, Sanders' taxes are not going to be in my personal best interest, but in the best interest of the country, so I support them. But also because some candidates actively work against their constituencies best interests, or pander to them with zero intent of following thru.
So much emphasis is put on rhetoric, style, and name recognition and so little is put on the record. People talk about Clinton's voting record as a %-Liberal when compared to Sanders, but when you evaluate the important decisions that differentiate them and compare them to their overall record the difference is clear. You have to examine the record or you're just being played.
I fully agree with your point about assuming what a person should desire in a candidate. Nobody can know for sure. It's possible that Hillary supporters believe in the New Democrat platform that is a little more corporate friendly and militant (GOP Light). But it's just as likely that a huge % of voters think Democrats = Good, Republicans = Bad (and vice versa)
Rubio took a huge hit in failing to garner 20% of the vote in Texas, meaning he didn't get a single delegate there despite only pulling 8% fewer votes than Trump, but that's all you're seeing, here. Remember that Texas fielded 155 delegates tonight (just shy of 1/3 of ALL delegates so far). He actually demonstrated much better demographic health and diversity of electorate support tonight than Cruz.So far....
Trump: 274
Cruz: 149
Rubio 82
The march 15th winner take all states going to be important. Rubio is looking pretty weak to me, but cruz still has a chance.
So far....
Trump: 274
Cruz: 149
Rubio 82
The march 15th winner take all states going to be important. Rubio is looking pretty weak to me, but cruz still has a chance.