I'm not objecting to your choice of words; I'm objecting to your theoretical construct. It's not like people make their money in some kind of libertarian utopia and then pay to the gov't. It's a fully integrated system. Gov't policy, including taxation, affects pre-tax income.
It's true by definition that if spending and taxation were equal, there would be no deficit. We haven't been discussing "shoulds" here (I mean, I did in my first post state one reason that Trump's presidency would likely be disastrous, but you and I have been discussing what is rather than what should be). If you want to, I'd say I'm open to the idea that there might be a time or reason why we'd want to all borrow money so rich people can be richer. I don't see the case for it in today's America, though.
I did in my first response to you. Generally, a tax cut can be financed by spending cuts. And note that it is easy to cut taxes in a way that doesn't give disproportionately to the wealthy, as someone who pays taxes in the highest bracket also pays taxes in all the other brackets.