Have you advised special counsel Mueller of this? I'm not sure he knows yetIts over Madmick, let it go.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/...irm-got-17-million-from-pro-russia-party.html
These advisers are the heart and soul of the Russian investigation. Flynn was the worst, but Manafort, Page, Stone, Sessions, and even Kushner have all been caught up in this web.
Contrary to those calling it a "witch hunt", it obviously isn't, but #Trumpets insist on making it about Trump, and Trump alone, when he himself wasn't even part of the investigation until he hounded (and then fired) James Comey for not letting Flynn and the Russian investigation go; an act that he lied about repeatedly, and was caught in making by his own admission, not to mention implied admissions by his son Eric Trump, and the fact that his highest-ranking lieutenants like Sessions stonewalled the Senate in a hearings they themselves requested: repeatedly refusing to answer questions while acknowledging that the questions didn't probe classified material.
Here's the thing if you want to pretend that you're impartial or centrist. If you care about what Comey revealed about Lynch, that she instructed him to call the inquiry into Clinton's malfeasance a "matter", instead of an "investigation", then you should be similarly outraged and pitchfork-wielding with regard to Trump insisting that Comey let Flynn go Scot-free, uninvestigated, while also demanding Comey's loyalty like some mafia boss. Same damn thing.
But most in here aren't actually centrist or willing to acknowledge misdeeds on both sides of the aisle. Very, very few of us can actually lay claim to that integrity. I'm not a life coach; it's a mirror to each man.
The thread title says "Pro-Russia", bud. It's the headline from the NYT.
Yes. Failing to report as an agent of a foreign power. It's literally a crime.Can anyone point me to the crime that took place here?
Yes. Failing to report as an agent of a foreign power. It's literally a crime.
HOT DOGS!!!!
<18><18>
shout out to @HomerThompson
TheStruggle trying hard to recover from his L he took two minutes ago.So charges should be pending now correct?
TheStruggle trying hard to recover from his L he took two minutes ago.
See post #28, wherein I instruct you to understand that this is going to be a very long investigation, as something we knew a year ago is just now coming into evidence with names and numbers. You're so bad at this.Yeah, we've been playing this "OH WE GOT THEM NOW" game for 9 months. Call me when someone actually gets hurled away in cuffs from a NY Times/Washington Post story because they committed an exact crime. Otherwise you clowns are circle jerking over a nothingburger...AGAIN.
One of his former employees, who he already got rid of, works with people who are pro-Ukraine??
Lock him up!
Manafort worked on the transition team.
See post #28, wherein I instruct you to understand that this is going to be a very long investigation, as something we knew a year ago is just now coming into evidence with names and numbers. You're so bad at this.
You asked for the crime, I showed you the crime. You then changed the subject to the investigation taking too long, and I noted that this investigation is going to take a long time. This is like peeling your banana, and instead of walking the peel to the garbage can yourself like a good boy who listens, you're trying to wrap your banana peel around the banana I just peeled. And you can't wrap your peel around my banana.Oh so now we are back to the "Well Watergate took 2 years excuse"...so you got nothing?
So are you saying "former employee" isn't correct?
Omg and he knows pro-Ukraine people?
Someone call Louise mensch! It's happening!!!