- Joined
- Aug 13, 2007
- Messages
- 21,365
- Reaction score
- 1
1,3,5 GSP
How so? Jonny landed the more effective strikes in the round while GSP "out struck" him by 1 strike, it's written right in the rules man, if the numbers are close the advantage goes to the more effective striker, this was Jonny.
I didn't see a different fight, I've just been watching combat sports long enough to know how to apply the rules as written. But like I said, I had to watch it in a bar and haven't had a chance to re-watch, my opinion may change when I get that opportunity.
The point is that he's marked up with almost no beating.
Let's just be honest and realistic. GSP marks up easy.
This was his face after the Koscheck 2 fight, and Koscheck only had one eye for four rounds and couldn't see shit. :icon_lol:
15 strikes did that.
1st - the fact is that i'm a huge st pierre fan - just go back and look at my previous posts over the years to confirm that - i'm just not a blind fan who ignores the obvious - the above is st pierre at the press conference post hardy - a fight where he got hit in the head 37 times - so what? any mark means he must bruise easily? - that's ridiculous - get over it
yeah - 15 strikes from a professional fighter to his face left a few minor bruises with zero swelling - thanks for proving my point - the rest of your post was meaningless hence deleted
Your boy lost, and your little blurb at the bottom of your posts doesn't change that. You might as well add ... "GSP 1,3,5 - the sky is Green" since both comments are equally true.
Thanks.
wow.
okay...
here is some more logic and fact for you.
1. there is clearly bruising on his forehead, side of his face and temple
2. they don't just clean off the sweat before the post-fight interview sessions, the ice down the bruising and clean and close any cuts/abrasions
3. that is from 0 significant strikes landed by Hardy, which debunks your assumptions from earlier.
just admit it.
the evidence is overwhelming.
I'm not asking you to say GSP won.
Just to look at the overwhelming evidence and facts to logically admit that GSP bruises rather easily.
How long have you been watching combat sports, being a certified judge usually seems to mean you know less about the sport than the hardcore fans, judges get the decision wrong all the fucking time.
I haven't had a chance to re-watch cause the WIFI in this motel is a joke but when I watched the fight live I had Jonny winning 4-1, and I'm a huge fan of GSP, I was devastated after the fight, couldn't believe what I just saw.
If the judges had used the rules as written Hendrix won, getting outlanded by an insignificant number in a round were you land the far more effective strikes is supposed to be scored to the guy landing more effectively, this was Jonny in all but round 5.
Won't be home for a month or so at which point I will re-watch but I doubt my opinion will change.
There is a serious and disturbing trend over here... You keep naming different fruits.you're like a bad joke - according to fightmetric he got hit 37 times in the face over the course of 25 minutes and as a result he has some light bruising - let me repeat that: he got hit 37 times in the face over the course of 25 minutes - don't try to pretend like literally any mark on his face means he has the skin of a grape - you have no point
1,3,5 GSP
you're like a bad joke - according to fightmetric he got hit 37 times in the face over the course of 25 minutes and as a result he has some light bruising - let me repeat that: he got hit 37 times in the face over the course of 25 minutes - don't try to pretend like literally any mark on his face means he has the skin of a grape - you have no point
Not sure what that point is. Nobody is talking about conspiracy here. The point of the thread and many people was that it was a close fight. 90% of people including the people you site agree that the fight came down to round 1. Round 1 wasn't this dominate round for Hendricks, or GSP for that matter. The point of the thread is the over reaction of the decision that made it seem like hell just froze over. This has been a trend going with close fights that have a winner winning a decision. Bendo fights are examples of this.
Gus and Jones is a great example of this. You look at this fight and saw that the champ clearly won the last two rounds, the other three rounds were close. Nobody dominated them. But what blinds people is not whether the challenger ACTUALLY won, but how well he did in regards to their expectations. That seems to blind a lot of people when judging a fight. That and the fact that a lot of people wanted Jones to loose.
The point is to look at each round and see who won them. There is no way we cannot see that each guy had 2 rounds a piece won decisively, the first round was the round in question. I don't think people are being honest when judging these type of close fights. No robbery happened. Just that two judges thought GSP did enough to win round 1 and the other judge gave it to Hendricks.
One of them is from BJ Penn.com. No bias there!
brick wall
1,2,4 Hendricks
just wait till he has full hand wrap bro
...do it right.
brick wall
There is a serious and disturbing trend over here... You keep naming different fruits.