- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 8,485
- Reaction score
- 0
i'm not a fan of the big gypo twat.....but...go home,you're drunk.Yoel Romero could literaly rape Tyson Fury. No bullshit. He could do it and Tyson Fury couldn't do anything to stop him.
i'm not a fan of the big gypo twat.....but...go home,you're drunk.Yoel Romero could literaly rape Tyson Fury. No bullshit. He could do it and Tyson Fury couldn't do anything to stop him.
Me 10 years ago would whoop me currently in any sport, but I'd still beat you now. Doesn't mean I'm at my best, just mean that my 60% is better than your 100%.DId he lose in that time?
but I'd still beat you now. .
Rockhold would take him down and literally give him brain damage or strangle him to death tooYoel Romero could literaly rape Tyson Fury. No bullshit. He could do it and Tyson Fury couldn't do anything to stop him.
How many boxers would survive that? He got lucky that a zombie of schlubs were lurching awkwardly towards him with their hands down.Please google turkish boxer street fight. Then tell me how a grappler even survive in such a scenario.
Reality is the best boxer in the universe against the best grappler/mt/whatever has the opportunity of winning with a sibgle strike. imagine an extreme scenario just for philosophic discussion. How does a grappler win a fight? close the distance. trow you and submit you. Imagine the best grappler in the universe. Ok? He still has to go through that process. In the mean time the best boxer in the universe has just to punch you in the chin to get you to sleep. This is somehow the mcgregor paradigm. As much as it is not nice to admit boxing is the most effective way of dealing with an opponent. Very simple. Unfortunately with boxing being the cash cow or at least historically the all ufc hype machine as always tried to diminish the value of it while all fighter have put their effort to learn it and still struggle.
Flamesuit on...but you know deep in your soul that im right.
Conor has no amateur record. He was never expected to do well in the fight. It was a money hype fight. Many retired boxers could put a clinic on Conor in boxing because it's not what he has spent most of his life doing.He tried to retire like 8 years before he actually did because his body was falling apart. Again, nobody is at their best at age 40.
Most MMA fighters could take him down, and tap him, or brutalize him.Rockhold would take him down and literally give him brain damage or strangle with to death too
No, there is no standard that says prize fighting means fighting in any venue, no matter how unskilled for the highest prize.It's prize fighting, you smart kid. You follow the money or it would be called something else.
No, there is no standard that says prize fighting means fighting in any venue, no matter how unskilled for the highest prize.
This isn't proto-boxing days where relatively untrained guys became prize fighting heroes. Guys are well-trained in their chosen professions, and there's more combat professions now, than there was then.
Prize Fighting was a phrase mainly used in regards to boxing matches, not some yet to be born MMA world. MMA is still a martial arts competition.
You're a moron.
Guys can fuck up their strategy all the time. The point is, what happens most of the time. You just admitted that you won almost every time.Dude I've been studying martial arts my whole life and training MMA for 8 years. I've fought boxers, kickboxers, and MMA fighters. And as someone who is primarily a grappler, yes I won almost every time in sparring. I felt that I had a strong advantage but I also had a strong striking basis in Muay Thai.
However, in my gym boxers have beaten well rounded MMA fighters 3 or 4 times out of 10. In my experience it can go either way. Closing the distance from too far away on a double leg got one dude caught and dropped.
Like I said MMA fighter by being well rounded to have an advantage. However, pretending that boxing always loses to grappling is a silly falsehood.
At 40??? There isn't any sport or any physical endeavor where guys are still in their prime at 40. Like I said, Floyd when he's slowed down is still better than Conor at full speed in boxing. He said it in promos, he doesn't have to be as good as he ever was, just has to be good enough to beat Conor.Conor has no amateur record. He was never expected to do well in the fight. It was a money hype fight. Many retired boxers could put a clinic on Conor in boxing because it's not what he has spent most of his life doing.
Mayweather being retired meant little when there was such a large experience, and skill gap.
Also, considering how boxers train, May-weather shouldn't bi falling apart physically at his age. MMA training is much harder on the body; especially the joints.
It was a phrased coined before there were numerous venues for combat sports.If you believe your definition of prize fighting is correct you clearly haven't been around or listening to the current meta. I'll be happy to answer once you have informed yourself of the real situation. Thanks for posting.
Floyd was fighting a guy who could get beat by most amateurs.At 40??? There isn't any sport or any physical endeavor where guys are still in their prime at 40. Like I said, Floyd when he's slowed down is still better than Conor at full speed in boxing. He said it in promos, he doesn't have to be as good as he ever was, just has to be good enough to beat Conor.
Can't say the dude is wrong about that. MMA is for the guys that can't hack at other sports, and other low level types really. You pay the least of any disciple, you are only gonna get the hand me downs after all. The rest is all just hype. Don't believe the hype.
You are so caught up in trying to prove MMA is superior that you arent even reading something that I have said multiple times. So let me make it very noticeable to you. MMA fighters have an advantage over boxers. That is not the argument that I am making. I am saying that pure striker vs pure grapple matches are not cut and dry.Guys can fuck up their strategy all the time. The point is, what happens most of the time. You just admitted that you won almost every time.
Grapplers have, and will always have an advantage over strikers. Already proven. No need for the controversy.
You're talking about a gym where guys train MMA. We're talking about if both weren't trained in each other's style.
You cannot be successful in MMA without being a good grappler. You can be successful in MMA, even with bad striking because of your grappling ability.
Again, this is not controversial. it's a proven fact.
BJJ, and wrestling are the most important elements to being successful in MMA, not boxing.
Pretty funny but true. Almost all multi sport athletes chose baseball and basketball over ftball. Hell Russell Wilson even did but he failed so he jumped back into footballFootball is for guys who can't play basketball