Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The War Room' started by TheStruggle, Aug 11, 2017.
Yeah go get the real shit from your Dr. , we need more opioid addicts.
I'm not saying this study is (or isn't) legitimate, but my concern is that the assiduous users of marijuana that I know are so dogmatic about its benefits, I sometimes worry that if legitimate research came out, they would never accept it.
No matter who comes out with a study about marijuana, if it even implies anything remotely negative, it is immediately attributed to big pharm wanting to keep you from the greatest thing ever. I think it's kind of silly.
Depends on how and who made your oil and what carrier.
Pm me and i will give you a break down
You sound mad Throwing around insults like that. Smoke some weed and mellow out.
What is funny is that conservatives are so anti pot and so pro brownies
i wouldnt know, im not conservative.
You don't know what, that conservatives are anti pot or that they love brownies? I am not conservative and I know both.
The hive mind mentality of the hardcore pro pot people is outstanding, keep on keeping on it is working.
I don't give a shit if this was a study on boners being good for the butt, it's simply complete junk science. You don't need a pro- or anti-pot stance to see this is simply shitty science.
It's takes a real hive-mind to ignore reality in order to reach a preferred conclusion. The reality is this study is flawed in some of the most basic ways.
They didn't even measure how much was being used. They could've had 5 people taking 1 hit a day vs 5 people smoking an ounce a day. If that simple variable was ignored, what else was unaccounted for?
It's simply a shit study, regardless of your stance.
I'm not happy to hear this.
A study of 1,200 people that didn't assess diet nor frequency of marijuana use somehow linked marijuana use to high blood pressure?
Smoking is known to cause high blood pressure. I bet smoking weed is harmful even if cannabis itself isn't. Even vaping causes inflammation and cell damage/death.
You are smoking these chump arguments like a blunt, bruh
No one believes alcohol or junk food are good for you, but try telling a pot head their drug habit may not be the greatest thing since sliced bread and they act as if you disrespected a family member. Your relationship with a plant is disturbing.
The people who did this study should be downright ashamed for how they went about doing it. Like user @BEER said they didn't assess frequency of use, diet and other facts. That is my problem with a lot of Marijuana studies is that the sample size is so relatively small its meaningless not to mention its illegal on a federal level so its much harder to get funded to be able to do long term studies. That is why when I see studies on this and other substances I usually will read the actual study itself to see how they went about doing said study.
yah i personally hate potheads but what i really despise is caffeine users, drug abusers through and through...
I'm not sure if you are saying " your" as in generally referring to pot smokers or literally speaking about me. Bit I've never smoked pot or any drug, and I've never tried a cigarette. I also drink less than 5 beers a year.
WTF? The "study" is garbage, by any definition.
Without pesticides, the foods that we eat would be far more infected with insect pathogens.
Pathogens are now a known link to cancer.
One could easily make the argument that the United States use of pesticide, has contributed to lower instances of stomach cancer in the United States.