Incredible Links Emerge Between Cambridge Analytica, Brexit, Trump, and Russia

[BrotherClaudio]

Accurate reporting on negative things done by this admin = biased reporting in the brain of a trampling

Did you listen during the run up to the election? It was laughable, it may as well be liberal public radio

 

[Fugazy]

Are you a gimmick or a retard?

I've got nothing on the role of Scotland in Brexit, so outside of that, which part of his post is innacurate?

 

[MayhemMonkey]

I've got nothing on the role of Scotland in Brexit, so outside of that, which part of his post is innacurate?

the entire post

 

[Fugazy]

the entire post

Paragraphs 2 and 3 are factually accurate.

Doesn't mean the OP in inaccurate.

 

[MayhemMonkey]

Paragraphs 2 and 3 are factually accurate.

Doesn't mean the OP in inaccurate.

no they are not...... and the OP is just portraying the facts. Anything else that goof said was just bullshit.

 

[Fugazy]

no they are not...... and the OP is just portraying the facts. Anything else that goof said was just bullshit.

Please explain how paragraphs 2 and 3 of post #10 are not accurate.

 

[method115]

and the OP is just portraying the facts

Not so sure about that. I've listened to the interview and I've been following this whole Cambridge\Russia connection. We do not know if Cambridge gave Russia the data or if it was hacked by Russia or anything like that. Which the OP says in his cliffs. Even CNN's article yesterday (which is mentioned in this interview) says that it might just have been an employee working remotely.

https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/17/technology/cambridge-analytica-data-facebook-russia/index.html

 

[KnightTemplar]

yup, no matter what anyone says about Putin he has shown himself to be one of the best tacticians in modern political history. If it wasnt our countries that he was fucking destroying Id doff my cap to him.

Putin's a real life Bond Villain. If they ever make a movie about him, they'll have to get Josh Brolin or Christoph Waltz to play the role

 

[RerouteToRemain]

a simple breakdown for those who dont get it

Gotta love the overly dramatic intro. Putin just won WW3.

Is he just talking about Trump voters in this video with just 1 square being the engaged Hillary voters? Does the 40% go for Hillary voters as well?

 

[method115]

Gotta love the overly dramatic intro. Putin just won WW3.

Is he just talking about Trump voters in this video with just 1 square being the engaged Hillary voters? Does the 40% go for Hillary voters as well?

My favorite part of all this has been the people who are so over dramatic about it. It's always the same shit. A new president comes in and everyone starts screaming "This is the end". I'm still waiting for my world to be destroyed because of Bush and then Obama was supposed to be the end of times as well.

 

[MayhemMonkey]

Not so sure about that. I've listened to the interview and I've been following this whole Cambridge\Russia connection. We do not know if Cambridge gave Russia the data or if it was hacked by Russia or anything like that. Which the OP says in his cliffs. Even CNN's article yesterday (which is mentioned in this interview) says that it might just have been an employee working remotely.

https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/17/technology/cambridge-analytica-data-facebook-russia/index.html

https://www.polygraph.info/a/cambridge-analytica-links-russia-/29120279.html

However, between 2014 and 2016, Cambridge Analytica repeatedly communicated and held at least three business meetings with representatives of the Russian oil giant Lukoil. The Russians specifically requested and received from Cambridge Analytica information regarding the use of social media and data to target American voters.

While the SCL Group, a British political and defense contractor, and its affiliate Cambridge Analytica denied the talks were political in nature, a company founder told the New York Times, Lukoil was interested in “data to tailor messaging to American voters.”

Lukoil has been on the U.S. list of Russian entities targeted for Ukraine-related sanctions since September 2014.

In November 2000, Lukoil acquired Getty Petroleum Marketing and its 1,300 gas stations in the United States.

In early 2000's, Lukoil was the target of a criminal investigation involving a multi-million-dollar cash smuggling scheme using the U.S. financial system.

Lukoil’s president, Vagit Alekperov, is #37 on Forbes’ list of the world’s richest people. He is also known for his loyalty to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

how did the russians magically access the specific data without help?

 

[MayhemMonkey]

Gotta love the overly dramatic intro. Putin just won WW3.

Is he just talking about Trump voters in this video with just 1 square being the engaged Hillary voters? Does the 40% go for Hillary voters as well?

who the fuck mentioned Hillary? get your head out of your ass for 1 second and look at all the evidence.

 

[RerouteToRemain]

who the fuck mentioned Hillary? get your head out of your ass for 1 second and look at all the evidence.

Ok Russia targeted people with propaganda. Are there examples of the propaganda?

I mentioned Hillary. Does the left not use propaganda? She got some massive campaign funding from other countries. Does that breakdown work for Hillary as well with 40% happy to just go with it. With 10% being groups like antifa, blm, open borders, rioters, etc. The left media race baiting at record levels and with that fake racist attacks all over, taking every opportunity to call Trump and all potential voters of his racist, misogynist xenophobic, homophobic, etc bigots. The media giving Hillary debate questions, downplaying any health concerns, hyping empty events, etc. Then a small group being engaged?

His post made it sound like no minorities voted for Trump. Compared to McCain and Romney Trump got more Hispanic, black and Asian votes. I was asking if that break down was just specifically for all Trump voters minus a small square of engaged Hillary supporters. Hillary won the popular vote so his shreds of paper are missing a large section. Also CNN is not all media.

Edit to add to this. It that guy suggesting without Russia the Republican base wasn't going to vote Republican? That the Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Ted Nugent's of the world weren't going to do their thing. That the some on the right wasn't going to meme/troll/make fake news. That the extremists (white, religious, CT, etc) weren't going to make noise? That the media giants weren't going to clash, that candidates weren't going to trash opposing media, etc. That the media, candidates, PAC's weren't going to try to divide. Campaign ads to trash and take out of context, etc? We didn't see any stuff like this in any other previous elections?

 

[Joe]

My favorite part of all this has been the people who are so over dramatic about it. It's always the same shit. A new president comes in and everyone starts screaming "This is the end". I'm still waiting for my world to be destroyed because of Bush and then Obama was supposed to be the end of times as well.

Really? Over dramatic? When was the last time the president of the US said it was a great idea to hand over Americans to a hostile government? Cause id love to know.

 

[MayhemMonkey]

Ok Russia targeted people with propaganda. Are there examples of the propaganda?

I mentioned Hillary. Does the left not use propaganda? She got some massive campaign funding from other countries. Does that breakdown work for Hillary as well with 40% happy to just go with it. With 10% being groups like antifa, blm, open borders, rioters, etc. The left media race baiting at record levels and with that fake racist attacks all over, taking every opportunity to call Trump and all potential voters of his racist, misogynist xenophobic, homophobic, etc bigots. The media giving Hillary debate questions, downplaying any health concerns, hyping empty events, etc. Then a small group being engaged?

His post made it sound like no minorities voted for Trump. Compared to McCain and Romney Trump got more Hispanic, black and Asian votes. I was asking if that break down was just specifically for all Trump voters minus a small square of engaged Hillary supporters. Hillary won the popular vote so his shreds of paper are missing a large section. Also CNN is not all media.

Edit to add to this. It that guy suggesting without Russia the Republican base wasn't going to vote Republican? That the Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Ted Nugent's of the world weren't going to do their thing. That the some on the right wasn't going to meme/troll/make fake news. That the extremists (white, religious, CT, etc) weren't going to make noise? That the media giants weren't going to clash, that candidates weren't going to trash opposing media, etc. That the media, candidates, PAC's weren't going to try to divide. Campaign ads to trash and take out of context, etc? We didn't see any stuff like this in any other previous elections?

he never specified who those people were that voted for trump in the video.... you are creating a narrative all of your own. Seek help.

oh and in response to your edit.... no, he's saying they all coordinated to provide disinformation to fool the public into supporting the "populist" right wing movements breaking out all over the world.

 

[jrams]

a simple breakdown for those who dont get it

This explanation is bad.

Blaming Russia on the chaos and division in the party is giving them incredible foresight to do things like Occupy Wallstreet and Michael Brown getting shot. Going into the election, the Republicans looked more split than anyone. The Republicans were trying their hardest not to nominate Trump and the Democrats were trying their hardest not to nominate someone who wasn't Hilary. Saying they all failed at stopping Russia from planing Trump as president because he divided the Democrats too small is stupid. They (as well as the Republicans) were dividing themselves just fine.

None of Russia's involvement explains:
1. Hilldawg's lack of charisma and her getting upstaged (by everyone, everywhere) every time she talked on stage with someone
2. Hilldawg's lackadaisical handling of emails and letting that issue ever to become a thing in the first place. She's been working towards being president for 30 years and had self-inflicted wounds.
3. Hilldawg's laziness and unwillingness to visit Wisconsin.

She got beat by an inexperienced black guy and a rookie in back-to-back elections and was on the ropes by a 90 year old socialist who's accomplished nothing and looks like the scientist in a monster movie. She was a shit candidate.

 

[MayhemMonkey]

This explanation is bad.

Blaming Russia on the chaos and division in the party is giving them incredible foresight to do things like Occupy Wallstreet and Michael Brown getting shot. Going into the election, the Republicans looked more split than anyone. The Republicans were trying their hardest not to nominate Trump and the Democrats were trying their hardest not to nominate someone who wasn't Hilary. Saying they all failed at stopping Russia from planing Trump as president because he divided the Democrats too small is stupid. They (as well as the Republicans) were dividing themselves just fine.

None of Russia's involvement explains:
1. Hilldawg's lack of charisma and her getting upstaged (by everyone, everywhere) every time she talked on stage with someone
2. Hilldawg's lackadaisical handling of emails and letting that issue ever to become a thing in the first place. She's been working towards being president for 30 years and had self-inflicted wounds.
3. Hilldawg's laziness and unwillingness to visit Wisconsin.

She got beat by an inexperienced black guy and a rookie in back-to-back elections and was on the ropes by a 90 year old socialist who's accomplished nothing and looks like the scientist in a monster movie. She was a shit candidate.

why the fuck are people bringing up Hillary to me? This guy didnt mention the Democrats or Republicans.

 

[luckyshot]

NPR is as biased as it gets

Who, in you esteemed opinion, then, is “fair and balanced”?




.... and why do I even bother pretending I will get a sesible reply?

 

[luckyshot]

I don't think anyone has an issue accepting foreign countries do espionage and meddle.

The question is did they have inside men helping them, particularly US nationals. That is what would be the more offensive part that hopefully everyone wants investigated.

This is part of the issue.

The other— just as important— part is that in 2016 we were WOEFULLY unprepared to combat election meddling in the Information Age, and as of now, our government is spending their time arguing over politics of what happened in 2016 rather than investing in how to be better prepared in 2018 and 2020. Of course, when the ruling party knows that the meddling helped them... that kind of takes the wind out of the sails of reform, emirite?

 

[jrams]

why the fuck are people bringing up Hillary to me? This guy didnt mention the Democrats or Republicans.

"This is the most simplistic explanation you are ever going to get on how Russia successfully won its hybrid war against America, using Trump as a figurehead."