And here I thought you were just joking around with this comment, bud.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/slip-the-jab/2014/mar/19/boxing-too-many-belts-champions?CMP=twt_gu
I mean, come on man. I know this is a public forum and any information I give/gave out in this thread and in other threads is given freely. But to write an article (and presumably profit?) based entirely on the information I provided here and without really offering your own information, well...That's a little low if you ask me. Especially for you because I know you're way, way better than that. Shit, your one paragraph about the early HW title confusion almost 100% matches mine word for word. I am glad that you were able to take the information provided here and maybe make a buck or two if you did. But I would have been much more okay with it if you added a lot of your own research & thoughts instead of relying solely on my own. Or, if you wanted to rely solely on what I said in this thread, had let me know in advance that you were doing so. I would have been fine with that too. The way you went about this, though? Doesn't sit quite right with me.