So, Obama knew in August and did nothing?
Lock him up.
Oh I get it. So because the news can't release their sources (and with good reasoning) I have no choice but to just believe them right? Even after what Comey said I should just go ahead and continue to believe? That's the answer you've come up with? Listen I get the way news and anonymous sources work but the problem is their credibility has been called into question after what Comey said and now we need to take a step back and figure this out. I say we as in this country does. The answer shouldn't be to hear what Comey said and simply shrug your shoulders and ignore it while continuing to parrot anonymous sources.
Frankly if any media outlet had any sense of credibility they would come out and address what Comey said. At they very least they would address it and announce plans to further vet these sources and where they are getting their information. There not doing that though are they?
Unless Trump asked or helped Putin in some way to perform the cyberattack,
How is immediately dismissing the info any less dangerous?
Oh I get it. So because the news can't release their sources (and with good reasoning) I have no choice but to just believe them right? Even after what Comey said I should just go ahead and continue to believe? That's the answer you've come up with?
If we all start to dismiss the information and hold these institutions to a higher standard we will all benefit from it that's how.
I dont have the requisite fedora to read plebbit posts
>june of 2017
>still believing washington post when they cite anonymous sources about trump
Latest WikiLeaks release shows how the CIA uses computer code to hide the origins of its hacking attacks and 'disguise them as Russian or Chinese activity'
https://wikileaks.org/vault7/?marble#Marble
Anyone remember this story??
So we call for them to abandon the practice of using anonymous sources altogether? That's completely impractical and essentially impossible. We don't live in a world where that's gonna happen.
The only thing a smart person can do is weigh the information, not attribute a value to it based simply on where it comes from.
How long until these psychos declare the election invalid because muh russia?
Nope didn't say that. I say we hold them to a higher standard i.e. make them not just accept any random anonymous source which they seem to be doing at this point. Make them vet the source get multiple sources. Just giving up and not even bothering to try and do something or even have the conversation doesn't seem like a good idea.
For ejaculation purposes i assume.
Why he got a linebackers neck tho?