Social Yale Newspaper Prints Guide On How To Destroy ‘White Boy’ Lives Like Kavanaugh

One of our most distinguished Universities is now actually pushing this idiocy. My hands are thrown up.

A Yale University student reporter published one of the most racist stories to ever be printed.

Isis Davis-Marks, the Yale Daily News opinion editor, published a piece advising minority students to spy on “white boy” students and ruin their lives later.

That is not an exaggeration. That is what she actually said....

She’s urging her fellow students to follow white males around, monitor them, spy on them, screenshot them, and document everything they do, in the hopes of ruining their careers at some point 30 years down the line.
If she knew anything about the history of socialism or communism, which, to make charitable assumptions, she doesn’t, she’s in fact calling for a Stasi-like atmosphere...

http://www.madnesshub.com/2019/02/yale-newspaper-prints-guide-on-how-to.html

Everyone knows a white boy with shiny brown hair and a saccharine smile that conceals his great ambitions. He could be in Grand Strategy or the Yale Political Union. Maybe he’s the editor-in-chief of the News. He takes his classes. He networks. And, when it comes time for graduation, he wins all the awards.


One day, I’ll turn on the television — or, who knows, maybe televisions will be obsolete by this point — and I’ll see him sitting down for his Senate confirmation hearing. Yes, he’ll be a bit older, with tiny wrinkles sprouting at the corners of his eyes and a couple of gray hairs jutting out of the top of his widow’s peak. But that smile, that characteristic saccharine smile, will remain the same.


When I’m watching the white boy — who is now a white man by this point — on CNN, I’ll remember a racist remark that he said, an unintentional utterance that he made when he had one drink too many at a frat party during sophomore year. I’ll recall a message that he accidentally left open on a computer when he forgot to log out of iMessage, where he likened a woman’s body to a particularly large animal. I’ll kick myself for forgetting to screenshot the evidence.


And, when I’m watching him smile that smile, I’ll think that I could have stopped it.


No, not everyone at Yale is evil. Not everyone is out to get you, and not every request to get a meal has an ulterior motive. But I’ve felt particularly introspective as graduation approaches. The Kavanaugh trial was months ago, but still has an indelible effect on me. Upon seeing the recent movie, Vice, the thought of my classmates’ future actions came to my mind again. I won’t get into the specifics of the movie here, but it discusses how certain foreign policy decisions made by the Bush administration endangered the lives of Iraqi citizens and made insurgency movements worse. Dick Cheney attended Yale for a time too, even if he didn’t actually graduate. It put the power of this institution into perspective, and led me to reckon with the fact that many of us will become extremely influential. Some of our peers will sit in war rooms with red buttons, capable of making life-or-death decisions in a split second. All of these things made me ask myself: What will the classmates who made those unintentional utterances, those subtle racist remarks, those assaults toward women, be doing on the eve of our 15th reunion?


Will they be high officials? CEOs of large companies? Presidents, even?


Probably. What is to be done about this situation? I’m not sure that the administration cares much about changing it. Surely, Yale needs rich — and notable — alumni to donate in order to keep the school afloat, but what do I know? I’m not in charge of the endowment. I don’t write the glossy pamphlets touting the seemingly countless resources that Yale has to offer.


This problem begins far before our classmates graduate, and we need to call them out on their transgressions — boldly and publicly. Anna Blech’s ’19 column on Daniel Tenreiro-Braschi ’19 was a good example of this. We should make instances of sexual assault and harassment public knowledge. Whisper networks, which are known as private chains of information which pass along knowledge of sexual assault, are useful, but insufficient in spreading information about indiscretions.


I think that we need to continue to call our classmates out, but it’s still not enough. After all, it wasn’t enough to stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation.


To be honest, I’m not sure what the solution is. This expands beyond vocalizing problems about sexual assault: The core of this problem has to do with our values. The problem isn’t just the Yale administration; it’s Yale students. We allow things to skate by. We forget. We say, “No, he couldn’t have done that,” or, “But he’s so nice.” No questions are asked when our friends accept job offers from companies that manufacture weapons or contribute to gentrification in cities. We merely smile at them and wave as we walk across our residential college courtyards and do nothing. Thirty years later, we kick ourselves when it’s too late.


But I can’t do that anymore — I can’t let things slip by. I’m watching you, white boy. And this time, I’m taking the screenshot.

https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/02/07/davis-marks-evil-is-banal/

To quote every NSA defender ever, if you have nothing to hide ........

But seriously, yeah, she should probably know people are watching her now, and they might not like what they see.
 
Some call is today the Mike Pence rule, but it's been around for awhile. To protect your self best to not be in a room alone with a female. If a problem comes up with a female best to leave the area. As the writer states some females want to make mens lives worse one way or another.
 
No lie, but this article makes her sound like quite the vindictive person. Hopefully she never holds any real power in life, because that's not a quality anyone in power should have.
 
I read the article, its not as bad as the OP is trying to make it out to be. She's saying that people in privileged institutions, like Yale, tend to look the other way when their peers are less than ideal in character and that this lack of accountability leads to these less than ideal individuals taking up positions of serious consequence.
Not peers. White boys.
 
No lie, but this article makes her sound like quite the vindictive person. Hopefully she never holds any real power in life, because that's not a quality anyone in power should have.

Our top colleges create such wicked souls every year. They foster and nurture the hate.

It's all going to plan. How does a cultural engineer accomplish their goals?
 
I'd be more worried if the shit was published in a more mainstream fashion.

Or if it was a reddit thread that gained a massive following.
 
So far I've given you a letter written to the King of Spain in 1542 and Christopher Columbus own writings. Both have had zero effect lol. Exactly how many accounts do you need to see before you will give this any credence?

And when people met the BTK they found him to be a nice guy.

The north eastern tribes were more original and settled and regarded the first white people they met as some kinds of gods until they found out better.

You fairytale that the noble red man lived in wonder land of truth, justice and harmony is just that a fairytale.

I’m not trying to make any excuses for what happened to them but this fairytale does them no good. To do good you need to see them as they were and are, people with all the bad and good of people.
 
there is so much pure bullshit posted on this board daily and you pick him to go after?

Having a bit of knowledge in this I just called out the bull shit.

I don’t think I will change his mind because he is not open to change but at least I gave it a little try in an effort to help in a very, very small way.
 
I don't see anything racist about what she said, she clearly states not all whites are evil. Good for her trying to make the world a better place and document the racism, sexism, and general lack of decency by white males at Yale.
Says the racist...^^^
 
I don’t think I will change his mind because he is not open to change but at least I gave it a little try in an effort to help in a very, very small way.

He thinks we are sub-humans lol. :-\
 
And when people met the BTK they found him to be a nice guy.

The north eastern tribes were more original and settled and regarded the first white people they met as some kinds of gods until they found out better.

You fairytale that the noble red man lived in wonder land of truth, justice and harmony is just that a fairytale.

I’m not trying to make any excuses for what happened to them but this fairytale does them no good. To do good you need to see them as they were and are, people with all the bad and good of people.

Strawman. I never said the natives lived in a wonderland of truth, justice, and harmony. They just weren't murderous barbarians killing and enslaving everything in their path. That is evidence by their lack of ability and knowledge in ways of war.
 
Strawman. I never said the natives lived in a wonderland of truth, justice, and harmony. They just weren't murderous barbarians killing and enslaving everything in their path. That is evidence by their lack of ability and knowledge in ways of war.

Ever heard of the Haida? They were a warrior culture who pillaged and enslaved people up and down the west coast. They would use slaves as chairs and would use them as logs on the beach to dock boats on. Very barbaric.

Don't confuse a lack of military tech with an absence of war. North American natives were in a perpetual state of war before Europeans showed up.
 
One of our most distinguished Universities is now actually pushing this idiocy. My hands are thrown up.

A Yale University student reporter published one of the most racist stories to ever be printed.

Isis Davis-Marks, the Yale Daily News opinion editor, published a piece advising minority students to spy on “white boy” students and ruin their lives later.

That is not an exaggeration. That is what she actually said....

She’s urging her fellow students to follow white males around, monitor them, spy on them, screenshot them, and document everything they do, in the hopes of ruining their careers at some point 30 years down the line.
If she knew anything about the history of socialism or communism, which, to make charitable assumptions, she doesn’t, she’s in fact calling for a Stasi-like atmosphere...

http://www.madnesshub.com/2019/02/yale-newspaper-prints-guide-on-how-to.html

Everyone knows a white boy with shiny brown hair and a saccharine smile that conceals his great ambitions. He could be in Grand Strategy or the Yale Political Union. Maybe he’s the editor-in-chief of the News. He takes his classes. He networks. And, when it comes time for graduation, he wins all the awards.


One day, I’ll turn on the television — or, who knows, maybe televisions will be obsolete by this point — and I’ll see him sitting down for his Senate confirmation hearing. Yes, he’ll be a bit older, with tiny wrinkles sprouting at the corners of his eyes and a couple of gray hairs jutting out of the top of his widow’s peak. But that smile, that characteristic saccharine smile, will remain the same.


When I’m watching the white boy — who is now a white man by this point — on CNN, I’ll remember a racist remark that he said, an unintentional utterance that he made when he had one drink too many at a frat party during sophomore year. I’ll recall a message that he accidentally left open on a computer when he forgot to log out of iMessage, where he likened a woman’s body to a particularly large animal. I’ll kick myself for forgetting to screenshot the evidence.


And, when I’m watching him smile that smile, I’ll think that I could have stopped it.


No, not everyone at Yale is evil. Not everyone is out to get you, and not every request to get a meal has an ulterior motive. But I’ve felt particularly introspective as graduation approaches. The Kavanaugh trial was months ago, but still has an indelible effect on me. Upon seeing the recent movie, Vice, the thought of my classmates’ future actions came to my mind again. I won’t get into the specifics of the movie here, but it discusses how certain foreign policy decisions made by the Bush administration endangered the lives of Iraqi citizens and made insurgency movements worse. Dick Cheney attended Yale for a time too, even if he didn’t actually graduate. It put the power of this institution into perspective, and led me to reckon with the fact that many of us will become extremely influential. Some of our peers will sit in war rooms with red buttons, capable of making life-or-death decisions in a split second. All of these things made me ask myself: What will the classmates who made those unintentional utterances, those subtle racist remarks, those assaults toward women, be doing on the eve of our 15th reunion?


Will they be high officials? CEOs of large companies? Presidents, even?


Probably. What is to be done about this situation? I’m not sure that the administration cares much about changing it. Surely, Yale needs rich — and notable — alumni to donate in order to keep the school afloat, but what do I know? I’m not in charge of the endowment. I don’t write the glossy pamphlets touting the seemingly countless resources that Yale has to offer.


This problem begins far before our classmates graduate, and we need to call them out on their transgressions — boldly and publicly. Anna Blech’s ’19 column on Daniel Tenreiro-Braschi ’19 was a good example of this. We should make instances of sexual assault and harassment public knowledge. Whisper networks, which are known as private chains of information which pass along knowledge of sexual assault, are useful, but insufficient in spreading information about indiscretions.


I think that we need to continue to call our classmates out, but it’s still not enough. After all, it wasn’t enough to stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation.


To be honest, I’m not sure what the solution is. This expands beyond vocalizing problems about sexual assault: The core of this problem has to do with our values. The problem isn’t just the Yale administration; it’s Yale students. We allow things to skate by. We forget. We say, “No, he couldn’t have done that,” or, “But he’s so nice.” No questions are asked when our friends accept job offers from companies that manufacture weapons or contribute to gentrification in cities. We merely smile at them and wave as we walk across our residential college courtyards and do nothing. Thirty years later, we kick ourselves when it’s too late.


But I can’t do that anymore — I can’t let things slip by. I’m watching you, white boy. And this time, I’m taking the screenshot.

https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/02/07/davis-marks-evil-is-banal/

Do you know the difference between official policy and a student newspaper?
 
He may well be. Problem is that his resume was never the issue, despite Trotsky being mad at his trust fund . The Dems laid a smoke screen and it never went after his qualifications. Which is sad. It was more like Jerry springer than a hearing imho.

I don't know what Brett would've done if Cory Booker told him : "You are NOT the Father!"

Would he start breakdancing while drinking a beer? <Moves>
 
Some tribes lived to raid other tribes for slaves and goods.

From the 1880 book "Indian Slavery in Colonial Times Within the Present Limits of the United States":

"During the period of colonial history, each European nation was in alliance, from time to time, with various Indian tribes. In time of war with other tribes, the allied Indians took an active part, and not infrequently they were urged on to hostilities by their white friends for various reasons. One of the these reasons was to obtain war captives to give to the whites for slaves. In 1698, Tonti had encouraged the Illinois, who were in alliance with the French, to capture and enslave the Iroquois Indians and so break their power. La Salle favored the same course. In 1708, the Candia French were exciting the Indians about Kaskaskia to wage war with each other, and were on the spot to the get the slaves to sell to the English"

Sounds to me like the raiding and taking of slaves was something that was being urged on and manipulated by Europeans. You know kind of like how they do today. You know, arm and finance dictators like Saddam Hussein or terrorist groups or cartels in order to provoke events they then can take advantage of.


Again, I never said it was a peaceful utopia. With that said much of this article is opinionated conjecture by limited and biased perspectives. Example:

"No. Not even close.

Get that nonsense that it was like the movie Avatar out of your head right now.

The tribes had no beasts of burden so growing food was incredibly labor intensive.

It has been conservatively estimated that 90% of their day was spend tending crops (by hand), planting crops (by hand), scouring the woods for roots and berries (by hand) or hunting for meat with bow & arrow or spear or traps & snares (by hand)."


So I guess because they worked hard all day and owned little that means a lower quality of life? Well according to Bartolome de Las Casas from 1542:

"They are also poor people, for they not only possess little but have no desire to possess worldly goods. For this reason they are not arrogant, embittered, or greedy. Their repasts are such that the food of the holy fathers in the desert can scarcely be more parsimonious, scanty, and poor"

Sounds to me like they were relatively content with their lives in a way the Europeans were not. The Europeans spents their days scheming on how to acquire and consume more and more. Where as these natives didn't concern themselves as much with that kind of thing.
 
so.....she's literally proving her own pt by writing this own article
her peers at Yale are looking the other way while she engages in abhorrent behavior, furthermore she sees nothing wrong with this hahahahahah

hilarious
 
You leftists and your empty racist claims. The word has lost all meaning thanks to you people.
I'm far from a leftist bitch, I voted Trump. I'm calling you out for saying "white males", instead of males in general. Explain to me how that wasn't racist?
 
Back
Top