WRL62

Which of these "egret facts" are actually true? (answers will be revealed in August)

  • Wealthy landowners, generally speaking

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is right at the level of the thread Ceez tarded up acting like he was rustling up the place, but just sounding like a 12 yr old.

And worst of all, he was boring.
 
Okay. We have the piece that helps move this along. The next piece would be to loop Jack back in here because the second part of the short conversation was him saying that definition is too broad, it can be applied to everyone or many politicians. If he were to provide some examples of politicians showing corruption by your definition, you both may agree and still disagree on whether to use a tighter or broader definition but you'd at least see why he wouldn't use yours over his own. Do you think that could work?

My position is that the fact that Clinton, like almost everyone her age who now supports SSM, changed her mind about it is not a sign of corruption at all. Redefining "corruption" to include something like that A) hurts our ability to communicate and B) is an example of the non-central fallacy anyway (i.e., "corruption" implies widely condemned activity, while changing one's mind is not widely condemned).

We agree on the fact that Clinton changed her position on SSM (or more accurately, I have taken the claim at face value, as it seems highly plausible). We just don't agree how to label it, which is a dumb thing to argue about anyway (and, ironically, exactly the thing that EGarrett incorrectly accuses me of liking to argue about).
 
I agree that he has issues admitting fault, but in this case I don't think it matters at all. You're using a rare definition in the first place.

I don't have issues admitting fault. But, yeah, I think throughout this (until this post), you've been fair and have made points that I agree with.

Does anyone drink Arizona green tea? It’s the only thing that usually gets me off soda for a short period of time.

My God. I love that stuff. I have to deliberately limit myself. Probably my biggest vice.

For hot green tea, I love Rishi.
 
We don't know cuz unlike when the righties get carded they arent constantly playing victim
 
Last edited:
Btw did @James Keith and @ben## become different posters? I'm just realizing that the Libertarian presence on here has diminished to become almost negligible since Gre and Viva took their wayward turns.

Oh, the one tag still works.
 
Btw did @James Keith and @ben## become different posters? I'm just realizing that the Libertarian presence on here has diminished to become almost negligible since Gre and Viva took their wayward turns.

Oh, the one tag still works.

The number is 236, I believe. Haven't seen him around in a while. And, yeah, libertarianism is pretty much dead in the WR. No need for the identitarian right to hide anymore.
 
The lounge is corrupted by your presence @EGarrett

Are you saying he's introducing an impurity into the thread or that he has power and once changed his mind about something? The latter seems hard to believe, but I want to be clear.
 
Why are most lefties on dubs.?
The mods have a right wing bias and we are being persecuted. I am setting up a discord channel for left wing content creators so we can share ideas and visions, inspire each other and also start a rebellion
 
Are you saying he's introducing an impurity into the thread or that he has power and once changed his mind about something? The latter seems hard to believe, but I want to be clear.
Without understanding what you mean: yes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top