Social WR Lounge v261: Opium-Free Heroin, for those trying to quit but still wanna shoot up!

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Just one foreskin is said to be able to grow these cells for decades. "


Now there's a sentence I never thought I'd read.


Apparently they’re worth $100,000, I think cut men can claim some of that, but it’ll be a small consolation compared to what was really lost.
 
My Spot is a troll. Very first WRer I ignored, I think (back when he was Mistogators). Shrimp was one of the first posters I saw here who knew his shit. He was in a group with Gandhi, Rup, HOLA (with a different name), sloppy, Dochter, Pan, and a few others. I know the rightists all loved a guy called Darwinist, but he was very occasional when I got here, and I never saw anything good (seemed like another Austrian). Most of the good right-wing posters moved left. I think Shrimp (again, assuming I'm right about his later accounts) was the only good poster to go the other way.


I was in a group with Darwinist and many older WR posters (an mma betting league on another site). This was when when guys Polynikes, evil eye gouger German BJJ, Title Fight, and @Zankou posted here. @Lubaolong was a regular getting it from everyone as well (although it was funny as he trolled them as well). HN was kippy Winstead at the time.

I then left for a while and came back to notice you, Pan, TCK, and shrimp - did not know any of these guys before.

Darwin (social Darwinist) is a very smart guy, was a social democrat, fell into libertarianism, but don’t think he is that way anymore. I have him on Facebook and he does not come across that way at least.
 
internet-seinfeld-done-KPTCBr8piZ51m
whenever i hear the word foreskin all i can think about is this dude and the word smegma


 
Wasn't really like that. It was just a running thing that people didn't believe that TCK was actually black, and then when there was a thread asking what people thought other posters probably looked like, Shrimp posted a guy in blackface for TCK, and got the hammer. I think he came back and complained about the ban and posted it again, like what wai was doing.

There was another guy who spammed it non stop, very anti Zionist but sort of left. Him I could see converting to trump. Wandywiolantfan?
 
I was in a group with Darwinist and many older WR posters (an mma betting league on another site). This was when when guys Polynikes, evil eye gouger German BJJ, Title Fight, and @Zankou posted here. @Lubaolong was a regular getting it from everyone as well (although it was funny as he trolled them as well). HN was kippy Winstead at the time.

I then left for a while and came back to notice you, Pan, TCK, and shrimp - did not know any of these guys before.

Darwin (social Darwinist) is a very smart guy, was a social democrat, fell into libertarianism, but don’t think he is that way anymore. I have him on Facebook and he does not come across that way at least.

Sometimes I forget you are a 2003. Man you are phenomenal.
 
for the record uncle jack is the protagonist of breaking bad and every show.

Jack+kelly+here+and+these+are+my+real+hands+_e9bf5ef2297e11f474f9d0968227741c.jpg
 
Not a fan of Pugs, but, while they do have a lot of potential issues, they don't all suffer and some of their inherent issues are handicaps they are born with and therefore adapt to not knowing any better.
Breeders ruined German Shepards. Never been a fan of them either, but its really shameful what they did to that breed.
Some of those handicaps are pretty gnarly. I remember seeing in a documentary that because of their flat snouts their eyes bulge ahead of their snouts so if they run into a wall they small their eyes instead of their snout and this creates vision problems. The snout issue also generates breathing problems.

Somehow I imagine there's an overlap between people who believe its okay to abort a disabled fetus but who like pugs as pets and see nothing wrong with breeding them. Just a hunch though.
 
I think one of the gov't's most important responsibilities is to prevent violence. Sex, on the other hand, should be encouraged. A society with less violence and more sex is generally a better one, while rising violence and falling sex is a bad development.
The wrong kind of sex can be bad though. Its well documented that children born out of wed lock and raised by single parents are more likely to have poorer outcomes when it comes to educational attainment, criminality, mental health issues, and so on. Encouraging sex that, in the aggregate, leads to more such births is bad and encouraging norms that prevent them is good for society.
 
me: pugs and circumcised penises are cute
the lounge:
d12.png
Pugs look like some thought giving a living being breathing problems was a good idea.

and the circumcised penis was also done for weird cultural shit too, then just became “normal” in the US but not the rest of the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top