I gave this post a like, but Captain Pedantic demands that I point out an "if a then b statement" is not, in and of itself, something you can contradict or dispute without additional information/context. Before it means anything to me, I'd need you to show that b does not follow logically from a or that a or b is objectively false, or in this particular case, that the conclusion that b follows from a is contradicted by Cubo's latter claim ITT. Now, perhaps that has all been shown and I missed it, but if so, I'd ask that you reiterate it for my edification since I'd like to confirm my intuition that what you're saying is correct and I've found it impossible to keep up with lounge threads lately. I hope that makes sense--otherwise I may have smoked too much pot today.
