Social WR Lounge v 235: Arcane Rogue Trickster, but who likes Sickness?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So I gave an emphatic thumbs down to the Cheeto mac n cheese.

On to the next novelty food item

6a286a33-5182-4603-b7de-f2ace65ba945.5b0e3b6c846682c51f91a743a1ffa9d7.jpeg




w6MEglMrLKMqdBkIhw6QjdQq6GKyBR3w02aO5iLjusgcqyPIl6nN7bBuc1THq8ETkLP3XCHZ9_vuOSwHIQFm-HQJAUPsTyA1F5Zd1SN8YTdq_UER_i9oCba4eewvGOb7xII=s0-d


Absolutely delicious. A little more of a gingerbread taste than the actual things, but still delightful.
.
You seriously didn't know til half hour ago that oatmeal cream pies were freakin awesome?

Were you raised by a cult or something?
 
.
You seriously didn't know til half hour ago that oatmeal cream pies were freakin awesome?

Were you raised by a cult or something?

Looks like he's eating Oatmeal Cream Pie cereal, not the pies themselves.
 
Now I feel bad...

my whole family is all mixed races and religions. It’s never been a thing I really considered from my end, as my family would never care about the race of whoever I dated. I just know about the stereotype of the angry white or Asian dad who doesn’t want his daughter dating anyone brown or black. The only time I ever actually experienced racism like that was when I was dating Japanese girls in Japan. I thought generally guys just kinda always got congratulated for getting laid no matter what lmao.

More sexist than racist if anything (on my end). I know I sound stupid and ignorant here but just being honest.
 
Based on your links on these court cases there seems to be a balancing act between the public's interest of the disclosed information and fear of retaliation against the people trying to remain anonymous.

And I think there is very strong public interest in knowing who's spending money on politics.

So sure maybe everybody gets to spend $100 on political activities anonymously but anything beyond that and your anonymity goes out the window... just thinking out loud

Yeah, that's why I referred to campaign donations having only the possibility of protection. It's not generally the case. But that's due to potential influence on the elected official, not the need to know who was publicly advocating for the candidate.

And again, direct/personal advertising is protected (eg. passing out leaflets). If I want to place an ad saying to vote for Ross Perot, the government has no compelling interest in knowing my identity. Conversely, I have a compelling interest in remaining anonymous. Especially in this day and age where harassment has become a national sport.

If you want to strike at the heart of the 1st Amendment (by compromising someone's ability/willingness to engage in political speech), I think there should be real proof a problem and strong reason to believe an Amendment passed to do so would meaningfully address it. For example the fabled Russian election hacking. Is it a fact that was a problem? If so, what's a useful measure? I'd support an Amendment that disallows any paid political advertising originating outside the jurisdiction the ad is targeting. This would affect not just foreigners, but billionaires like Bloomberg who reside in one state and fund campaigns in another.
 
Now I feel bad...

my whole family is all mixed races and religions. It’s never been a thing I really considered from my end, as my family would never care about the race of whoever I dated. I just know about the stereotype of the angry white or Asian dad who doesn’t want his daughter dating anyone brown or black. The only time I ever actually experienced racism like that was when I was dating Japanese girls in Japan. I thought generally guys just kinda always got congratulated for getting laid no matter what lmao.

More sexist than racist if anything (on my end). I know I sound stupid and ignorant here but just being honest.
Reported for sexism
 
So (and I am just asking out of an interest in your thinking and how you see the world plus a measure of empathy,) would you say it might be more of a case that you were able to get through it to maintain an illusory "life" rather than you actually being interested in having sex with women? If that were true (and it only sounds like it going by this post--not judging) I would say that means you aren't bi, doesn't it? You don't need to justify your answer whether it's yes or no, obviously--just wondering what you think about that, and whether or not the distinction matters and why.

I have a lesbian friend who has had heterosexual experiences (voluntarily at least once or twice) who tells me the idea makes her sick to her stomach now. When I first got to know her it was less clear she hated the idea of sex with men from the signals she sent me--my complete lack of fucks given about peoples' sexual preferences seems to make me attractive to lonely lesbians*, but I digress. Your experiences are not precisely similar to hers, but there are lots of different ways you can survive feeling genuinely feel forced into something you find repulsive and the aftermath seems to leave scars that are common among a lot of people (myself included).


*I don't know if you recall the story about my dispatcher job, but out of three lesbians working in that office I slept with 2 of them. Sure, you could say they were bi but I wouldn't--it was circumstances and me being who I am that brought us together I think, not having a penis.

That's probably fair to say. It's not like there's ever been any sense of confusion or uncertainty about it, only stressful surrounding circumstances. If you change my situation, it just would've been a more rapid trajectory to the same destination.
You are gonna give some of the fellas here a complex bro.

"Even the gay guy has slayed way more pussy than me??? FML..."
It was admittedly mostly a matter of social pressure. I would've came out at like 10 years old if the environment I occupied wasn't so hostile to gay people and I didn't feel like my life would be over with that disclosure and/or exposure. I definitely needed to become financially independent first, which I am now.
 
Yeah, that's why I referred to campaign donations having only the possibility of protection. It's not generally the case. But that's due to potential influence on the elected official, not the need to know who was publicly advocating for the candidate.

And again, direct/personal advertising is protected (eg. passing out leaflets). If I want to place an ad saying to vote for Ross Perot, the government has no compelling interest in knowing my identity. Conversely, I have a compelling interest in remaining anonymous. Especially in this day and age where harassment has become a national sport.

If you want to strike at the heart of the 1st Amendment (by compromising someone's ability/willingness to engage in political speech), I think there should be real proof a problem and strong reason to believe an Amendment passed to do so would meaningfully address it. For example the fabled Russian election hacking. Is it a fact that was a problem? If so, what's a useful measure? I'd support an Amendment that disallows any paid political advertising originating outside the jurisdiction the ad is targeting. This would affect not just foreigners, but billionaires like Bloomberg who reside in one state and fund campaigns in another.

I think there is a big difference between passing out Perot leaflets and spending millions on TV ads due to reach. I think the the US public does have a compelling interest to know who's funding political ads over a certain $ threshold
 
I think there is a big difference between passing out Perot leaflets and spending millions on TV ads due to reach. I think the the US public does have a compelling interest to know who's funding political ads over a certain $ threshold

Of course one has far more reach than the other. And of course you're entitled to your opinion.
 
OCPs are one of my fav snacks because they let me pretend they're somewhat healthy.

Though I like oats in pretty much every form. I'm like a horse in that way.

And one other way.
<{yearp}>

Are you eluding that your peen looks like someone made beef jerky out of a tube of cookie dough ?
 
Now I feel bad...

my whole family is all mixed races and religions. It’s never been a thing I really considered from my end, as my family would never care about the race of whoever I dated. I just know about the stereotype of the angry white or Asian dad who doesn’t want his daughter dating anyone brown or black. The only time I ever actually experienced racism like that was when I was dating Japanese girls in Japan. I thought generally guys just kinda always got congratulated for getting laid no matter what lmao.

More sexist than racist if anything (on my end). I know I sound stupid and ignorant here but just being honest.
Japan is exceptional IMO. Racism seems too light a word to describe this aspect of a large part of the population. It's odd. And among Japanese men (#notallofcoursebutmany) women may receive even less respect than people of other ethnicities (except Koreans, sigh) despite the "stay away from my daughter" thing. That is probably why just as many women see scoring with a white guy as a huge win (according to my wife--though she wasn't referring to herself, I guarantee that). It will get better with time but people being so long lived there means their attitudes survive with them. The guy who had to quit the Japanese Olympic Committee--after he said women talk too much in meetings--was in his 80's and the guy he wanted to replace him is just as old.

My parents were both white and Christian but they were fairly well travelled. They didn't give a fig about ethnicity. My father's pet name for my mother's best friend was "The Black One"--possibly because because she was literally my mother's one black friend; but more likely she was possibly the black woman in Charlottetown at the time and if not, the count was certainly in the single digits. I was older than I care to admit before I even understood what he meant by it but that is when I also understood he and I gave zero fucks about race. That is not to say I'm free of unconscious bias--no one is nor should they be--but in all the ways that count except for an unfortunate delight in certain jokes though I no longer tell them--aspects of other people that don't impact me directly generally don't affect what I think of them, though that may be oversimplifying too much.

But I digress.

Since I was a little kid there have been movies of the week, not to mention All in the Family, showing how shitty it must be for your parents to give your significant other a hard time. My parents didn't even give me a hard time when I got myself entangled with a real shitwad of a person, though it may have been apathy as much as anything by that time. I am glad your you and equally grateful myself that we never had to deal with that, but man, I gotta feel for anyone who has, especially if you're close to your parents. Imagine being 20 and head over heels, adoring your parents and completely oblivious to the ol' man's beliefs, and you bring home someone that elicits the reaction, "NOT IN MY #*#$%@&@(#%^# HOUSE!" Crushing.

Anyone who read this far: if this describes you, dude, I'm sorry but know that people support you even if you don't know them. I hope you've been able to get past it and love your life and your choices.

Otherwise, you're welcome to join me,
0qFvsZ6.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top