Social WR Lounge 326: where are we at?

What is your political alignment?


  • Total voters
    81
Status
Not open for further replies.
My money is on Vance/Rubio vs Newsom/Whitmer
This but Pritzker beats out Newsom in a primary

Whitmer is probably who they pick for VP just because of what VP is at this point, but I hope Shapiro or Beshear is the actual VP. Or even makes more national news and is the candidate

Vance and Rubio is definitely the next GOP pairing to keep the MAGA going
 
This but Pritzker beats out Newsom in a primary

Whitmer is probably who they pick for VP just because of what VP is at this point, but I hope Shapiro or Beshear is the actual VP. Or even makes more national news and is the candidate

Vance and Rubio is definitely the next GOP pairing to keep the MAGA going
I'm no expert, just keeping my ears open here and there, but I predict that only happens if Trump dies in offce or is booted out via the 25th amendment--better than 50/50 chance of that IMHO. If Trump makes it to the end of the term, I think they're run someone other than Vance in 2028. Rubio with MTG would not surprise me.

Everything I hear suggests Vance is quite unpopular with Republicans, including MAGA. Mind you, I could obviously be totally wrong about that--I mean, I never thought Trump had a chance in 2024 either, so take that FWIW. I don't wish to suggest I'm certain about any of this. I just want to get it on the record in case it turns out I'm right lol.
 
This but Pritzker beats out Newsom in a primary

Whitmer is probably who they pick for VP just because of what VP is at this point, but I hope Shapiro or Beshear is the actual VP. Or even makes more national news and is the candidate

Vance and Rubio is definitely the next GOP pairing to keep the MAGA going
There is no way a morbidly obese person gets the nomination. Trump is large as is possible without being revolting.
 
Any combination of Pritzker, Newsome, and Whitmer is pretty revolting. Each one of those scumbags was busted breaking their own covid lock down rules.
 
So it’s only slurs that infractions? Like I had one of my posts taken down because I called someone an asshole or sack of shit I can’t remember, but I didn’t use slurs.


I just want to know for future reference.
I mean in the WR you're allowed mild flaming (to an extent) but it your post was taken down it may have been because it only contained the insult?

Like if you explained why they're an asshole or sack of shit the post is more likely to stay up then just saying "you're an asshole/sack of shit" with nothing else added to it.
 
There is no way a morbidly obese person gets the nomination. Trump is large as is possible without being revolting.
Trump’s fatter than Pritz now. He should bring a scale out to the debate stage and dare Trump to step on it

Dude been going on walks (and probably ozempicing but hey that’s what it’s for. Take a load off that heart)

He’s like, typical American fatty now. Not cartoon level fat
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
I mean in the WR you're allowed mild flaming (to an extent) but it your post was taken down it may have been because it only contained the insult?

Like if you explained why they're an asshole or sack of shit the post is more likely to stay up then just saying "you're an asshole/sack of shit" with nothing else added to it.
I’m quite sure it was pretty self explanatory as to why this poster is a sack of shit, but yes my post had more than just asshole or sack of shit
 
I’m quite sure it was pretty self explanatory as to why this poster is a sack of shit, but yes my post had more than just asshole or sack of shit
I don't know what post you're talking about so I don't know why it was deleted. Could have been a derail but just because it's not infraction worthy doesn't mean it won't be deleted, like I said mild insults are fine but only to an extent.
 
I don't know what post you're talking about so I don't know why it was deleted. Could have been a derail but just because it's not infraction worthy doesn't mean it won't be deleted, like I said mild insults are fine but only to an extent.
I love insulting people here
 
I’m quite sure it was pretty self explanatory as to why this poster is a sack of shit, but yes my post had more than just asshole or sack of shit
It's a personal judgement call by the mods. "Flaming/Trolling" is technically against the rules, so if someone feels like it, they can punish you for any little thing. I once got dubbed for calling someone a "bitch" in jest, while discussing movies in the Mayberry. It wasn't even a hostile thing, but a mod saw it, and a mod decided that it was against the rules.

They're more like guidelines, really...
 
It's a personal judgement call by the mods. "Flaming/Trolling" is technically against the rules, so if someone feels like it, they can punish you for any little thing. I once got dubbed for calling someone a "bitch" in jest, while discussing movies in the Mayberry. It wasn't even a hostile thing, but a mod saw it, and a mod decided that it was against the rules.

They're more like guidelines, really...
Can't find any record of you getting dubbed for that in the Mayberry. The only infraction you have for calling someone a bitch was fighter bashing in 2016.

I love insulting people here
As long as it's within reason. Most of you WR regulars would be long gone if you brought your insults to the other subs.
 
Can't find any record of you getting dubbed for that in the Mayberry. The only infraction you have for calling someone a bitch was fighter bashing in 2016.
It happened in 2013. It's still in my PM's, LOL. It was that dastardly @Madmick, although it was in the videogame forum talking about some LOTR game. Got my lines crossed there.
 
It happened in 2013. It's still in my PM's, LOL. It was that dastardly @Madmick, although it was in the videogame forum talking about some LOTR game. Got my lines crossed there.
Yeah can't see infections prior to the 2015 xenforo migration from your account directly but they are recorded but I cbf looking in the archive
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top