- Joined
- Sep 2, 2017
- Messages
- 1,174
- Reaction score
- 6
Okay I have nothing else to say then!
Cheers
Cheers
I thought the objective was to win?
I thought the number one rule in boxing was hit and not get hit?
The fact that you find him boring says more about you then it does about him. Watching folyd fight is a master class in displine and staying within yourself.
Lastly how many folyd fights have you seen? He has always been risk adverse ( a good thing ) but as the guys he fought got bigger he stopped koing people. But in his early days he was considered a ko artist.
Floyd and Buakaw are among the most unpredictable fighters in the world. Are we watching the same fights?Sometimes boring and extremally predictable fighters are almost udefeatable.
Buakaw from my opinion is boring to watch, he is incredibly predictable!, only takedowns are not so predictable. Despite this he wins fights.
The objective is to KO the man in front of you... at least IMO the purpose of stepping into the ring is not to outpoint the guy, its to knock him out. Floyds game plan is not to KO, but to outpoint. As I previously mentioned, fighting the way he fights is boxing, and you cant take anything away from him, he wins fair and square, just boring turning a fight sport into a point fighting sport. Sure he still kos guys like hatton for example.
As I mentioned before, it is boxing, cant take anything away from him. Just that people dont want to see point fighting, they want to see fighting.
Yeah dude hes a master at the fine art of boxing and all that great stuff and the boxing master enjoys watching his great technical skills etc etc........its just boring to watch, people dont want to watch a point fighting boxing match and someone go in there with that intent........they want to see guys like Tyson go in there and knock someone the fuck out..........im not debating his skill or tactics or trying to say its not boxing........just that myself and common fans want to see fights, not the fine art of boxing. and boxing can be both a fine art and a fight, and it can be turned into more of a fight vs a technical match depending on the fighter.
Which means jack. Your gripe has more to do with personal taste and less to do with technical know how. You prefer slugfests nothing wrong with that.I boxed prior to starting MT, I have competed in boxing, and still cross train boxing. I am not a boxer, but have a good understanding of it and enjoy watching it.
not sure how many fights of his I have seen off the top of my head but I would say I have seen all his big payper view fights since way back in the day man. Though I definitely have not seen all of his fights thats for sure. I previously mentioned that when he was younger, he fought much more aggressive and that he was finishing guys, and that was much more exciting to watch then how he fights now and that I think most would enjoy seeing that rather then how he fights now.
To me the point of stepping into a boxing ring is to knock the guy out in front of you, not win on points. People want to see a fight like gatti vs ward, not watch some one dance around the ring and tally up points. Great master tactics aside that boxing purists may enjoy watching, I would prefer to see a fight.
You are wrong. The object of any sport is to win. not to entertain not to be a fan favorite its to get the job done.
If that where true Mayweather wouldn't have the highest grossing fights of all time hell he owns the entire list.
Which means jack. Your gripe has more to do with personal taste and less to do with technical know how. You prefer slugfests nothing wrong with that.
The numbers say otherwise.
@shincheckin
No boxing is not fighting.
Boxing is boxing. It's a sport.
Knocking someone out is the best mean to win a fight, especially at the lower levels not the end.
Anyway that's got nothing to do with Mayweather who could it all.
You sound like you have only watched some of his highlights.
It's also a point fighting sport, exactly because not all fights can end with KO.
Again what all these have to do with Floyd? He had a pretty big KO ratio.
Once he started having hand problems, getting older and fighting at his walk around weight, stopped knocking out people. How does this discredit him though?
Contrary, it shows how great of a technician he was. He beat them all by controlling all the engagements using feints superior timing and by sharpening his technical tools even more in his latest years.
I personally watch boxing for the technical nuances.
This is where the difference is between someone good and someone great.
If you like seeing people smashing each other then more power to you.
I happen to prefer watching Floyd than Brandon Rios.
My problem isnt that you prefer one style of fighting over another, it's that you are passing off your preferences as fact. Like you are speaking for the masses.That is kind of my point, I don't want to see a wild sloppy unskilled fight, but i much rather watch 2 skilled boxers that are lesser skilled than mayweather go to war than watch mayweather play chess. Ill take canelo GGG all day over mayweather pacquiao.
My problem isnt that you prefer one style of fighting over another, it's that you are passing off your preferences as fact. Like you are speaking for the masses.
Entertainment is relative. I'd rather watch team basketball vs a great individual performance. I'd rather watch a case study by Floyd than a case slugfest.
That is kind of my point, I don't want to see a wild sloppy unskilled fight, but i much rather watch 2 skilled boxers that are lesser skilled than mayweather go to war than watch mayweather play chess. Ill take canelo GGG all day over mayweather pacquiao.