- Joined
- Nov 28, 2018
- Messages
- 2,356
- Reaction score
- 949
anyone can get in a fight, is like saying anyone can shoot thus everyone who touches a gun is a marksmen.Fight against who? More or less anyone can fight, just look at a pub brawl.Like, what qualifies as being able to fight for you? Because I would be very surprised if a taolu wushu champion didn't know how to fight. My reasoning being that though we think of what works in combat sports like MMA and kickboxing - that's different from fighting in of itself.
I was talking to a 19 year old who has started Muay Thai recently, he was laughing at wing chun saying it was useless for fighting and that he would beat them up. To which my response was, no, though it might look dumb and might not work against a seasoned thai boxer, that wing chun guy would absolutely kick his ass - because there's more to fighting than just the techniques you use or the context of combat sports.
My point mainly being that, those people training in kata competition, I can reasonably assume, didn't get to be world champions in kata through only kata practise alone, surely they would have had to do a lot of kumite along the way to get there - and if I were to discredit someone as a martial artist because they didn't 'fight' - I don't consider point based karate competition to be a fight either, so I would have to discount them as martial artists too.
I don't discount them as martial artists, but I hope you can see why I don't like the idea of saying someone is or isn't a martial artist based on my own personal value in how they compete or express their style.
some one who trains to fight imo is someone who has a high likelihood of winning a fight against a regular person due to skill in fighting, and can hold their own against others who have similar levels of training to fight.
i'd call kid who has wrestled in a pee wee league for 2 years more of a fighter/martial artist than someone who has 'trained' karate/kung fu/TKD etc for 20 years with a hyper focus on kata.
