- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 796
- Reaction score
- 0
She's a cutie, no doubt. That Seinfeld hair would make me softer than baby poo, though!Not spectacular, mind you, but doing all right (pre-breast cancer, at least - maybe they're gone now)
She's a cutie, no doubt. That Seinfeld hair would make me softer than baby poo, though!Not spectacular, mind you, but doing all right (pre-breast cancer, at least - maybe they're gone now)
I would be careful with this image since there is a bit of a nip slip, same with @Jimmy McGillI agree. Although she's so much more hotter now than ten odd years ago when she forst started modelling.
she's worth 200 million dollars and is heir to her 84 year old father's 4 billion dollar fortune. Interested now?The one that never moved the needle and baffled me was Julia-Louis Dreyfus.
Smooth creamy skin, brunette, solid rack, good overall weight, and...nothing.
Was it the stupid hair that ruined it all? I don't know.
Now Julie Andrews would get plowed like a major thoroughfare in January
big Sophie Howard was waaaaay hotter.I agree. Although she's so much more hotter now than ten odd years ago when she forst started modelling.
thanks for the heads up, i'll change it but its nonsense really, we're all on devices, that at a click of a button, you can see all sorts, and a nip slip could get you dubs.I would be careful with this image since there is a bit of a nip slip, same with @Jimmy McGill
Don't remotely fancy her. Not a boob man.big Sophie Howard was waaaaay hotter.
Just looking out for my sherbros, I've seen people banned for less.thanks for the heads up, i'll change it but its nonsense really, we're all on devices, that at a click of a button, you can see all sorts, and a nip slip could get you dubs.
what's happening to the UK, is it turning into Murica, and becoming a millennial generation of ass men ?Don't remotely fancy her. Not a boob man.
Lucy is the exception to this, but all those British glamour models with big natural boob's who became popular through zoo & nuts I never particularly liked.
No I'm not talking about the boner killing gutter pigs or wilde beasts, but attractive women that for whatever reason just never really had sexual thoughts about:
For me the #1 has to be Julie Andrews:
Yes Julie Andrews, you see as a kid I saw her in the likes of Sound of Music and Mary Poppins, and the image burned into my head of this lady is one of, I don't know, but its not sexual in anyway.
Maybe I saw her as too much a grown up at the time, and back then, as a kid people didn't go around thinking about humping grown ups as much maybe.
She's not a bad looking woman:
I mean, after she got those chompers fixed
Another one that almost has this affect on me is Audrey Hepburn:
Fortunately I could see doin some fancy humping with Audrey
What about you guys?
You have to admit, half of those big boobed British birds were not all that attractive. Just appeals to those who like massive boobs.what's happening to the UK, is it turning into Murica, and becoming a millennial generation of ass men ?
I was outwith the Zoo demograph, page 3 from an early age however, did make sure I was raise a boob man, ass wasn't even an after thought, face, tits ,legs...You have to admit, half of those big boobed British birds were not all that attractive. Just appeals to those who like massive boobs.
The more recent ones from those mags i mean.
Now Sam Fox & Melinda messenger WOW!!
Funny You say that. I'm not sure how this big ass/thighs thing sprung on so fast. I used to go by face/legs 1st.I was outwith the Zoo demograph, page 3 from an early age however, did make sure I was raise a boob man, ass wasn't even an after thought, face, tits ,legs...