Crime Woman in Minneapolis Executed by ICE Officers; White House Reflexively Hand Waves Murder

I was hoping id never see Schiff open his mouth again. Why did you have to post that?

but i will ask you like ive asked others. Is being an "ICE watcher" illegal? Why do you feel the need to point out something that isn't illegal? You are saying it like someone would point out someone from the middle east was a member of ISIS.
Nobody said it was. The point of the post is showing just how utterly dishonest Democrat politicians are being about this. Says she wasn't involved in protesting, yet wasn't just a regular protester, but part of an organized protest group. Schiff is trying to suggest that the woman just plum got stuck in the middle of the road by chance. It's so utterly ridiculous.
 
No, its not illegal. Nor, did I imply it was. I'm pointing out a blatant lie from one of the dem's top leaders.


Lol, what?

You, and people like you, keep stating this woman was an "ICE WATCHER" As if she was some undercover criminal. The same way people would point out someone from the ME was a member of ISIS, or al-queda, etc. The only reason you mention it, is to try and paint her as some type of criminal for doing it.
 
Well, quite. She was being arrested for shoplifting, not Murder One. Trying to drive away with an armed cop six feet in front of her was never going to end well.

People need to learn: never bring a car to a gunfight.
Bro...responsibility for de-escalation in these situations falls to law enforcement first and foremost. The cops need to follow procedure: STOP PUTTING YOURSELF IN THE FRONT OF A VEHICLE FOR ANY REASON WHEN IT COMES TO MINOR FUCKING CRIME.

"You're not getting away because it undermines my perceived authority" is no way to apply law & order in sane society.

Was the woman absolutely retarded? You better fucking believe it. And that's why it's even more important for LE to treat EVERY case like that might happen.
 
Nobody said it was. The point of the post is showing just how utterly dishonest Democrat politicians are being about this. Says she wasn't involved in protesting, yet wasn't just a regular protester, but part of an organized protest group. Schiff is trying to suggest that the woman just plum got stuck in the middle of the road by chance. It's so utterly ridiculous.

Schiff is a complete moron. Who else besides him has said this lady wasn't protesting?
 
Yeah? Care to elaborate? Is it the jews? I feel like maybe America was headed this way no matter what, but Trump has made the timeline increase 300%. He is literally the perfect figurehead to completely divide both sides in America. Every single thing Vance and Trump does flames the tensions an insane amount.
No it's your media. It's used to divide people. It's been going on before trump was ever on the political scene. there is a certain point, cant pin point exactly when. I was in highschool and not paying attention but americans began adopting more and more "extreme" ideas. It starts with silly widley adopted statements like "All white people are racist", "there is no Neutral on a moving train", "A black person can't be racist" "check your privilage" ect. Statements like this cause a divide in people and who, are genuinely not racist/bigoted feel under attack then feel the need to defend themselves. It creates sides you have to stand on. All these things slowly but surely begin to polarize individuals. Terms like "anti-vaxxer" which is a term the media created intentionally to divide people with dishonest language gets people to hate eachother. then, the politicians pander to those audiences. Nuance is removed. Everything becomes black or white. you're on my side or you're the ememy. people have turned against eachother. I think social media has a lot to do with it as well. It's all about clicks, comments, likes and engagement. Controversial content is far more engaging. the country hates trump as president but the news cycle loves it because he says such depraved and outragous things, It draws attention it gets people engaged, People get passionate, then they lose themselves to hate. Donald trump didn't create this. he just captialized on it.
 
Last edited:
I don't even know what argument you want to have here, but its obviously nothing to do with the incident. So have fun with repeating "No, you are" over and over.
obviously he's pointing out you said:

"The lady played the stupidest of games and won the stupidest of prizes. She is more to blame than anyone. Every decision she made only made the situation worse. Had the agent not fired, she'd be a felon. There is never a time when evading law officers or resisting arrest will make a situation better. Never."


while complaining about hyperbole or dramatics. you literally make an absolute statement about fault placing it on her.

and no, it's not automatically a felony.
 
You, and people like you, keep stating this woman was an "ICE WATCHER" As if she was some undercover criminal. The same way people would point out someone from the ME was a member of ISIS, or al-queda, etc. The only reason you mention it, is to try and paint her as some type of criminal for doing it.
Thats bullshit. Calling someone from the ME a terrorist without any knowledge of that is bigoted stereotyping. This woman actually was associated with an organized protest group and not some random person at the wrong place at the wrong time. Cry some more about it.
 
Bro...responsibility for de-escalation in these situations falls to law enforcement first and foremost. The cops need to follow procedure: STOP PUTTING YOURSELF IN THE FRONT OF A VEHICLE FOR ANY REASON WHEN IT COMES TO MINOR FUCKING CRIME.

"You're not getting away because it undermines my perceived authority" is no way to apply law & order in sane society.

Was the woman absolutely retarded? You better fucking believe it. And that's why it's even more important for LE to treat EVERY case like that might happen.
and unfortunately every single agent involved escalated. it wasn't just one. it was gang mentality.
 
yes. you'd get the fuck out of the way with desperation. life or death makes you choose life.

he didn't act as if he was fearful of his life. his actions didn't convey that at all.

if you fear your life is in imminent danger from a fuckin car, you get the fuck out of the way as fast and clear as possible. 100% of the time.

he drew his firearm and shot. 3 times. twice from side position. that is NOT the action of someone fearing imminent death from a car.

he didnt act fearful for his life? We saw about 2 seconds of him... in which he avoided ending up on the hood or under the car when it bumped him.... also ended up shooting someone... you wanted a dramatic dive or something ? Some super slow mo? More fear in his face? ( that you cant see ) maybe some extreme fear induced action that from the outside seems a extremly over the top reaction from him?. ( oh wait.. )


Do you know how easily being even slightly bumped by a vehicle in those conditions could end up with you under said vehicle?

you cant make statements like 100% of the time based on your assumptions.

100% of the time accelerating with anyone in front of your car is a threat to the person in front of the car... or is your arguement truly its the sole responsibility of the person in the road to move out of the road Of the vehicle??

Thats theres zero threat from accelerating towards someone.... and bumping someone with your vehicle??? Ummm okay. Its Going to make some of those protests with road blocking pretty spicey if this is the standard you think is wise.

oh i always have issues with how many shots your officers use... it frequently appears they arent taught to stop and seems excessive many times with how many shots are fired.
 
The root cause of this specific issue is the training of ICE agents, and their protocols, and what this Administration is letting them get away with.

Why do we have untrained ICE agents in military garb, with facemask on, armed, and not wearing bodycams? Can you give me a valid answer on why every ICE agent DOESN'T HAVE A BODYCAM?

Why are these ICE agents attempting to enforce traffic laws? They CAN'T do that.
There are in fact allowances for federal agents to be deputized at local/state level, which would allow them jurisdiction on things like traffic. That's an entirely separate discussion and some shifty shifty shit but it exists. I haven't heard if any of the agents involved were in this situation but be prepared for that to be something the Feds announce, regardless of whether it was true or not.
 
Thats bullshit. Calling someone from the ME a terrorist without any knowledge of that is bigoted stereotyping. This woman actually was associated with an organized protest group and not some random person at the wrong place at the wrong time. Cry some more about it.
that doesn't justify killing her. she obviously wasn't there for violence.
 
Nobody said it was. The point of the post is showing just how utterly dishonest Democrat politicians are being about this. Says she wasn't involved in protesting, yet wasn't just a regular protester, but part of an organized protest group. Schiff is trying to suggest that the woman just plum got stuck in the middle of the road by chance. It's so utterly ridiculous.
It's crazy that they'd attempt to harm their own narrative like that. People are forgetting just how powerful honesty is, and should be.
 
he didnt act fearful for his life? We saw about 2 seconds of him... in which he avoided ending up on the hood or under the car when it bumped him.... also ended up shooting someone... you wanted a dramatic dive or something ? Some super slow mo? More fear in his face? ( that you cant see ) maybe some extreme fear induced action that from the outside seems a extremly over the top reaction from him?. ( oh wait.. )


Do you know how easily being even slightly bumped by a vehicle in those conditions could end up with you under said vehicle?

you cant make statements like 100% of the time based on your assumptions.

100% of the time accelerating with anyone in front of your car is a threat to the person in front of the car... or is your arguement truly its the sole responsibility of the person in the road to move out of the road Of the vehicle??

Thats theres zero threat from accelerating towards someone.... and bumping someone with your vehicle??? Ummm okay. Its Going to make some of those protests with road blocking pretty spicey if this is the standard you think is wise.

oh i always have issues with how many shots your officers use... it frequently appears they arent taught to stop and seems excessive many times with how many shots are fired.

He had his cellphone out recording 4 seconds before he shot and killed her.


Does he look like he is in fear of his life right here?

G-KmGTyWkAAIUtY
 
Yep. Curious to see what everybody who says the car didn’t hit him will say when it’s clear as day.

What makes it even more fun is that at least a few of them call out the other side for refusing to admit fault.

Part of the issue is the deliberate utilization of language to make things sound more or less serious to fit whatever agenda a person has.
When someone says they were "hit" by a car, what that looks like generally has a pretty clear image in most people's minds. It sure as shit isn't what was in that video. I wouldn't need multiple video angles to know if someone actually got hit by a car that was trying to run them over.
Couple that with people calling her a terrorist, and acting like she was intentionally driving at him to kill him and it makes this whole argument dishonest bullshit.

Did the vehicle and man make some sort of physical contact? Yes. But how we define that contact dramatically changes the conversation.
People can debate on what the most appropriate verb was, but it wasn't "hit".
"The car grazed/tapped/brushed against the man as it turned in the opposite direction before the masked thug put a bullet in the woman's face" doesn't sound as sexy of a headline for ICE though.
 
he didnt act fearful for his life? We saw about 2 seconds of him... in which he avoided ending up on the hood or under the car when it bumped him.... also ended up shooting someone... you wanted a dramatic dive or something ? Some super slow mo? More fear in his face? ( that you cant see ) maybe some extreme fear induced action that from the outside seems a extremly over the top reaction from him?. ( oh wait.. )


Do you know how easily being even slightly bumped by a vehicle in those conditions could end up with you under said vehicle?

you cant make statements like 100% of the time based on your assumptions.

100% of the time accelerating with anyone in front of your car is a threat to the person in front of the car... or is your arguement truly its the sole responsibility of the person in the road to move out of the road Of the vehicle??

Thats theres zero threat from accelerating towards someone.... and bumping someone with your vehicle??? Ummm okay. Its Going to make some of those protests with road blocking pretty spicey if this is the standard you think is wise.

oh i always have issues with how many shots your officers use... it frequently appears they arent taught to stop and seems excessive many times with how many shots are fired.
he was "bumped" because he needed to be in position to shoot her.

and yes, absolutely you dramatically act if you believe you are in imminent danger of death.

it wasn't excessive to him, because his goal was to kill her and make sure she couldn't flee, not to protect himself.
 
obviously he's pointing out you said:

"The lady played the stupidest of games and won the stupidest of prizes. She is more to blame than anyone. Every decision she made only made the situation worse. Had the agent not fired, she'd be a felon. There is never a time when evading law officers or resisting arrest will make a situation better. Never."

while complaining about hyperbole or dramatics. you literally make an absolute statement about fault placing it on her.

and no, it's not automatically a felony.
I know what hes referring to, but I dont think hes arguing that she did not behave stupidly and did not pay a giant price for it , which is what youd have to be arguing in order to point that one sentence out.

I dont think its hyperbole because I think she did make stupid decisions and did pay a dramatic price for it. As opposed to saying she tried to murder someone, whch she didnt. Or saying the officer is some sort of jack booted nazi murderer, which he is not.

If neither you nor Pete can understand the difference between these two things, then have a good day because I'm too Danny Glover in Lethal Weapon for this shit.
 
I would think whatever video they have comes out sometime between tomorrow and Monday. I don't think they are trying to cover anything up , it's all right there already just the legal stuff going on behind the scenes with everyone getting their ducks in a row

I think you can debate weather the shooting was necessary but that It is a good as in legal shooting. I understand why the officer thought he needed to do that. I'm not happy some liberal lesbian got killed but I do think she got herself killed.

Lawful, but awful. You are correct. She 100% used a deadly weapon on an officer who probably put himself in harm's way. But that is why you don't break the law and block roads as an "Ice watch Warrior."
 
Back
Top