Crime Woman in Minneapolis Executed by ICE Officers; White House Reflexively Hand Waves Murder

Proving again how incompetent you are at analyzing anything....

The Dr. isn't the one who says "what the fuck man?".

You're a clown.

Who says it? I'm watching a video of a person you claim is a dr and the officer is telling someone to "calm down" as they are dropping expletives.

And you're a moron arguing that a cop shouldn't shoot at the vehicle that is running him over. F'N idiots on the left.

Here's an unpopular opinion - don't hit officers with cars if you want to live.

In fact, don't F with them in the first place if you want to live. And if you do F with them, know when the hell to stop if you want to live.
 
Amusing watching the administration struggle with the media who won't buy their lies.

JD Vance having a hissy fit when he's reminded the investigation is ongoing is *chef's kiss*

Luckily for them, they've already brainwashed the mugs to believe the "legacy media" are just out to get them - simply by holding them to account lmao
Our highest leaders are deciding what happened immediately after the shooting of a civilian before an “investigation” even takes place. Shocker.
 
Who says it? I'm watching a video of a person you claim is a dr and the officer is telling someone to "calm down" as they are dropping expletives.

And you're a moron arguing that a cop shouldn't shoot at the vehicle that is running him over. F'N idiots on the left.

Here's an unpopular opinion - don't hit officers with cars if you want to live.

In fact, don't F with them in the first place if you want to live. And if you do F with them, know when the hell to stop if you want to live.
how was he "hit by a car" and uninjured at the same time?

and again, why did he take the time to draw his weapon instead of, while fearing for his life, leaping out of harms way? he took the kill.
 
Our highest leaders are deciding what happened immediately after the shooting of a civilian before an “investigation” even takes place. Shocker.

The idiots in here defending the shooting and/or the admin are lost and blind.

They think they have a friend in the government.

They don't.

They really, really dont.
 
I dont think anyone has said she hit him on purpose; only that it was his perception that she did. And that his perception is the overriding factor for justifying the shooting. At least the initial shot.

Our president and Vice President are saying it you idiot and all the posters currently ITT back them up.

So are you saying Vance and Trump are lying to millions of people?
 
There are some more questions I'm waiting on like how long was she actually there. What were her interactions like before hand. I just haven't currently seen anything to back up that she was trying to block ICE from doing anything yet.

Since her wife got out to film and blow whistles (long enough to get her crowd) I'm going to assume she was there a little while.
 
we got a sovereign citizen here
How does knowing your constitutional rights makes one a sovereign citizen?
Most of the shit they spout has nothing to do with the constitution. They reference some wild shit that has no use in the current times and completely misconstrue that even.

I suggest you read up on the constitution, know your rights and limits of law enforcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
"She was impeding the operation!"
"She wouldn't stop the vehicle!"
You guys aren't even trying to get this stuff straight. That's how lazy it all is.

Can you grasp the concept that different events happen at different times? I'm guessing you can't also fathom how the ICE trucks were driving if they were stuck in snow?
 
What I’m saying is, that little move he did to get out of the way? He should’ve just done that. No need to draw his weapon and fire at all.

It’s tough to tell from the video what the driver’s intent was. I’m torn between her not seeing him, or seeing him and trying to drive around him, as it looks clear to me that she wasn’t driving directly at him.


Lot of people will be spinning narratives. Right might say shes trying to kill him, left will say she was executed. It seems a bad combo of bad enforcement tactics with person trying to flee(bad citizen tactics).

She wasn't trying to hit him but ultimate subjective intent of the driver is not going to be an issue. There was a real risk striking the agent while fleeing and it will come down to what a reasonable officer in this situation would have felt in fear of injury/death in that split second of reaction of a vehicle going into drive that fast at such a close distance.

The issue is that she hits the gas while the vehicle is pointing at the agent....infact the tire is pointing to slightly left of the officer when she hits the gas. He initially goes for his gun at that very moment when the vehicle is in fact pointed at him(even the tires) and her tires are spinning because there is ice on the road(ironically). That office is also standing on ice meaning he has little grip as well and he's probably around 2 feet from the hood. His defense is simply going to be she launched the vehicle at him at an incredibly close distance and he reacted with deadly force because he believed that he was in danger. There will most likely be more video on this that will either further his defense or do the opposite and hurt his case but her launching the vehicle that aggressively and close while pointed at him initially is going to be the bulk his objective reasonable test defense. It would seem crazy to me anyone who thinks this is a slam dunk guilty case unless you have an agenda. I don't know if its slam dunk that he wont get prosecuted either at the state level but there is a defense here but we will find out if they attempt to prosecute at the state level(i doubt at federal level)

giphy.gif


Another misunderstanding is that people think ICE agents don't have the authority to detain her as if being in a vehicle grants magical powers like she has an hidden immunity idol on Survivor. They are federal agents and if they deem that you are obstructing justice they can in fact enforce it and they will obviously claim she was. There is no magical "they have to go around you" rule. Thats made up shit that gets people in bad situations. The difference is they typically don't enforce it as its usually not productive to what they are doing. There is a good post on Reddit I just saw that explains the bulk of the confusion.

w6p3VAR.jpeg
 
Who says it? I'm watching a video of a person you claim is a dr and the officer is telling someone to "calm down" as they are dropping expletives.

And you're a moron arguing that a cop shouldn't shoot at the vehicle that is running him over. F'N idiots on the left.

Here's an unpopular opinion - don't hit officers with cars if you want to live.

In fact, don't F with them in the first place if you want to live. And if you do F with them, know when the hell to stop if you want to live.
The woman. Are you retarded? Do you even read/watch/listen to the tripe you vomit up?

The guy at the beginning identifies as the Dr.

You're still playing stupid that the cop (who is not entitled to detain) stepped in front of the vehicle to initiate the shoot. Their own department have done studies on mentally unstable people like that guy...and you.

You're a simpleton with a 65 IQ. You're why representative democracies were proposed instead of direct.
 
So Ice is the enemy?

You are at the "why didn't anyone stupid them, grandpa" stage, and you're going to be that grandpa having to answer to your granddaughter why you not only stood by, but cheered.

Hopefully by then you'll be able to admit "because, my love, i'm a coward and i'm stupid".
 
Back
Top