Crime Woke garbage inserted into missing children case in Canada

Contrition of forced contrition? I mean we might as well make sure every German speaker first apologizes for world war 1 and 2 before speaking.
 
Contrition of forced contrition? I mean we might as well make sure every German speaker first apologizes for world war 1 and 2 before speaking.
Check this out,

45. We call upon the Government of Canada, on behalf of all Canadians, to jointly develop with Aboriginal peoples a Royal Proclamation of Reconciliation to be issued by the Crown. The proclamation would build on the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Treaty of Niagara of 1764, and reaffirm the nation-to-nation relationship between Aboriginal peoples and the Crown. The proclamation would include, but not be limited to, the following commitments:

  1. Repudiate concepts used to justify European sovereignty over Indigenous lands and peoples such as the Doctrine of Discovery and terra nullius.
  2. Adopt and implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as the framework for reconciliation.
  3. Renew or establish Treaty relationships based on principles of mutual recognition, mutual respect, and shared responsibility for maintaining those relationships into the future.
  4. Reconcile Aboriginal and Crown constitutional and legal orders to ensure that Aboriginal peoples are full partners in Confederation, including the recognition and integration of Indigenous laws and legal traditions in negotiation and implementation processes involving Treaties, land claims, and other constructive agreements.
 
@Cool Hand Luke I want to emphasise I'm specifically talking about federal agencies and federally funded organizations. It's a show of good faith and respect for indigenous sovereignty--like a diplomatic relationship among nations, more than anything else.
 
@Cool Hand Luke I want to emphasise I'm specifically talking about federal agencies and federally funded organizations. It's a show of good faith and respect for indigenous sovereignty--like a diplomatic relationship among nations, more than anything else.
I can appreciate the concept for sure, seems like Canada is attempting to do much more in righting the wrongs of the past for their indigenous people compared to the US. Though I have to admit, when reading those calls to action, the end game appears to be their desire to separate from their western colonizers completely at both a federal and community level. They don't want acknowledgements, they want what they consider their land back.
 
I can appreciate the concept for sure, seems like Canada is attempting to do much more in righting the wrongs of the past for their indigenous people compared to the US. Though I have to admit, when reading those calls to action, the end game appears to be their desire to separate from their western colonizers completely at both a federal and community level. They don't want acknowledgements, they want what they consider their land back.
I think we're going in circles now. I can't speak for how many indigenous people think the acknowledgements are good or bad. I am only speaking of their intent. The negative reaction ITT is evidence for why it's necessary.
 
To the radical lefties, this is not a bug but a feature, the downfall of western civilization is basically their ultimate goal, even though most aren’t honest enough to come right out and say it.
Aren't you from Russia or some other shithole? Keep dreaming because the west and especiallty America is as powerful as it's ever been. Cope.
 
Aren't you from Russia or some other shithole? Keep dreaming because the west and especiallty America is as powerful as it's ever been. Cope.
Not Russia, but I did grow up in another communist dictatorship not far from there, which is why I’m allergic to your leftie Marxist bullshit.

Nothing to cope with, I live here now and have for most of my life and want to see the West continue to thrive and not keep spiralling further into this leftist garbage.
 
I think we're going in circles now. I can't speak for how many indigenous people think the acknowledgements are good or bad. I am only speaking of their intent. The negative reaction ITT is evidence for why it's necessary.
i think we're just speaking, no circles that i can see.
 
i think we're just speaking, no circles that i can see.
Is that so? I've addressed the same point of yours over and over ITT.
I think it's hilarious how people fall over themselves to acknowledge it.

How about this, let those who want to acknowledge, acknowledge. Let those who don't want to, skip it.

I understand the purpose behind it but if there is no law compelling people to make such acknowledgements, then why not leave it up to the people to use their own judgement?

Contrition of forced contrition? I mean we might as well make sure every German speaker first apologizes for world war 1 and 2 before speaking.

I can appreciate the concept for sure, seems like Canada is attempting to do much more in righting the wrongs of the past for their indigenous people compared to the US. Though I have to admit, when reading those calls to action, the end game appears to be their desire to separate from their western colonizers completely at both a federal and community level. They don't want acknowledgements, they want what they consider their land back.
All of these boil down to, "Yeah, but why tho?" And I've addressed it every time. You said you understand the purpose and appreciate the concept but keep questioning it. Redundant exchange is redundant. Have a nice day.
 
Not Russia, but I did grow up in another communist dictatorship not far from there, which is why I’m allergic to your leftie Marxist bullshit.

Nothing to cope with, I live here now and have for most of my life and want to see the West continue to thrive and not keep spiralling further into this leftist garbage.

So now i'm a "leftist marxist" because i called you out on your bullshit? lol, dude you rage on this forum constantly and your entire life is on the internet so you probably think trannies are taking over the world or something. Get outside once in awhile and you will see the west is doing just fine regardless of the propaganda you're swallowing.
 
So now i'm a "leftist marxist" because i called you out on your bullshit? lol, dude you rage on this forum constantly and your entire life is on the internet so you probably think trannies are taking over the world or something. Get outside once in awhile and you will see the west is doing just fine regardless of the propaganda you're swallowing.
You "called me out" by lying and making shit up, getting my birth country completely wrong, then projecting some nonsense that couldn't be further from my actual position?

GTFOH you dishonest clown, you're an NPC with nothing of substance to offer to the conversation and you're only worthy of going on the ignore list with the other try hard trolls.

<DisgustingHHH>
 
lol what a load of crap. Especially where it comes to picking sides. Again, even when pointed out to you, you missed the point altogether. It could have been any public official in the pope costume. I forgot how dumb you are, honest to fuck.

I have no idea what happened at the Olympics nor give a fuck why it would be disrespectful to Christians but if it's that they dressed as priests or some shit, Monty Python beat them to it 60 years ago.

We're talking about a head of state and a government paramilitary organization. Not fucking civilians at the fucking opening ceremonies.
Sure sure, you have no idea, there was a 100 page thread on it that went on for months, and you who's posting here 24/7 know nothing about it right?

You're a dishonest cunt.
 
Sure sure, you have no idea, there was a 100 page thread on it that went on for months, and you who's posting here 24/7 know nothing about it right?

You're a dishonest cunt.
I don't follow or remember every thread here. Cry some more and when you're done you're welcome to provide a link to that thread if you want me to make fun of you some more.
 
I can appreciate the concept for sure, seems like Canada is attempting to do much more in righting the wrongs of the past for their indigenous people compared to the US.
Not really. It's just lip service to make white Liberals feel good. It ain't doing shit for the Natives.
 
I don't follow or remember every thread here. Cry some more and when you're done you're welcome to provide a link to that thread if you want me to make fun of you some more.
Ya ok, "president of the war room" with 50 thousand posts, yet you don't remember one of the biggest topics discussed only 8 months ago.

<DontBelieve1>
 
It's smart to do that. Investigators want the full cooperation of anybody and everybody, including a large indigenous population. It's a gesture of solidarity between groups who historically have a lot friction. In the context of missing children, Canadian city police and RCMP have been criticized for lacking in investigative measures of missing indigenous women.
 
Last edited:
It's smart to do that. Investigators want the full cooperation of anybody and everybody, including a large indigenous population. It's a gesture of solidarity between groups who historically have a lot friction. In the context of missing children, Canadian city police and RCMP have been criticized for lacking in investigative measures of missing indigenous women.
You have a pretty low opinion of indigenous people if you think this performative virtue signalling will make them cooperate if they weren't going to otherwise.

As for the RCMP, they seem to be lacking in investigative measures when it comes to missing white people too since they're still completely clueless about what happened to the two kids. That makes their lame pandering even more pathetic, they got nowhere in their investigation, but they made sure to check their woke agenda box.
 
Check this out,

45. We call upon the Government of Canada, on behalf of all Canadians, to jointly develop with Aboriginal peoples a Royal Proclamation of Reconciliation to be issued by the Crown. The proclamation would build on the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Treaty of Niagara of 1764, and reaffirm the nation-to-nation relationship between Aboriginal peoples and the Crown. The proclamation would include, but not be limited to, the following commitments:

  1. Repudiate concepts used to justify European sovereignty over Indigenous lands and peoples such as the Doctrine of Discovery and terra nullius.
  2. Adopt and implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as the framework for reconciliation.
  3. Renew or establish Treaty relationships based on principles of mutual recognition, mutual respect, and shared responsibility for maintaining those relationships into the future.
  4. Reconcile Aboriginal and Crown constitutional and legal orders to ensure that Aboriginal peoples are full partners in Confederation, including the recognition and integration of Indigenous laws and legal traditions in negotiation and implementation processes involving Treaties, land claims, and other constructive agreements.
Conspicuously missing is: “We will return the land we took.”
 
Back
Top