Well I'm a truth fanboy above all else. People might think I'm a bigger than I actually am because I'm able to see through the nonsense, distorted versions of truth, bias, hate and group think which is influencing the narrative. All I do is shed light on the other end of the spectrum which is willfully ignored. Does that make me a fan or just someone capable of critical thought? You be the judge. Truth is I don't care, about Conor or anyone else enough for me to distort the truth in their favor. I have a hand dawn Fedor poster on my wall, same boat.
you obviously operate from the more hating end which is fine, to each their own.. But it also means you aren't going to b the most objective person when it comes to knowing where I truly stand. Anyone acknowledging some of the things I do will seem like a fanboy to you whether that's the case or not.
On the topic in question, I think for myself when it comes to boxing and mma analysis. However when you have boxing greats, legends, up and comers, current champions, mma fighters and champions of all shapes and sizes showing that respect, it means something. That wasn't just fluff, these people are not being paid to deceive the public on anyone's behalf. They're giving their honest account of what happened and in this case they were dead on.
For an mma fighter fighting against even a 40 year old past prime Floyd, arguably the greatest defensive fighter of all time and one of the best fighters of this generation, he had a good showing for himself. Context is everything here. He demonstrated some good boxing ability, landed shots and impressed a lot of people. Particularly people in the know. He deserves that respect and got it from people who truly understand the game without an agenda. It is mostly only the fans arguing otherwise
The narrative is that Floyd carried him, what actually happened was strategy. He allowed Conor to punch himself out, stayed in his shell, felt him out, got his timing and range down, sniped the body and dragged the fight into deeper waters where he would then drown him. Later on Conor's holes in defense at that level were made apparent and he was also no longer the same threat as the early rounds and you seen Floyd change up his style. It was a strategy you would expect to see of a 40 year old past prime Floyd fighting an unorthodox southpaw opponent who in spite of his inexperience was a bit of a wildcard. Something even Paulie eluded to
Anyways, the truth is there for all to see and people are left to make of it what they choose.