- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 39,109
- Reaction score
- 9,764
I responded to your articles by asking you to pick a specific topic we could further discuss. You took offense to me criticizing one of your sources lol
I’ve read enough CAP to know their work, no different than you shutting down whenever you hear anything remotely sharing a GOP/Conservative viewpoint.
As for White Supremacists, I think the whole idea is flawed but I don’t think I’ve ran into many or any to properly assess. I guess that might be a product of me not labeling and rural white person a Supremecist lol.
Although I don’t see them any intellectually different than my local genderless Starbucks barista with neon purple hair complaining about the carbon footprint yet ironically catching planes to they/them/their antifa rallies.
But then again to each their own.
<puh-lease75>
You did not even address the first article. If you wanted to talk about but a specific example, you chose not to on that one, choosing to just ignore it while crapping on the other articles you didn't read. Nature isn't political, and they highlighted a very serious issue you're not to amenable to speaking about, clearly.
"Although I don’t see them any intellectually different than my local genderless Starbucks barista" And that makes you sound absolutely insane and unethical.