Opinion Why is "anti DEI" and "anti-woke" a POTUS top priority?

I’m Asian and I didn’t mention support for DEI. Weird thing to assume.
So you're hung like an Asian?

nate-diaz.gif
 
why it is top because creates anymosity trust me no white person other then cuck will say yes he desrves everything more then me because he is so supperior tome because he or she is exotic and i am pale and so on or we need one of them here no atter who because with out we can not reach this or that level it is stupid and annoying.it just create anymocity in whites who say they got it because they are that create anymocity in minorities toward whites who say you do not want to give us power that you have lol which is funny non of these have power but creators of dei way above anybody on first level that have annomacity toward each other
 
Last edited:
Lol youre just embarrassing yourself at this point. Couldn't even muster an attempt to explain how DEI isnt racist against white men. Just doubling down on attempting to mock the people who are being discriminated against by DEI. Pathetic show of racism.


i did, and of course you dodge, deflect and deny like most trumper peen pumpers. You also kinda seem like a weak ass, crying about how your rights are being curbed as a white person. Welp, glad you got rid of DEI, now you wont be protected. Not like you needed it.
 
Diversity refers to the presence of variety within the organizational workforce in characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, veteran status, or religion


it sounds to me you have no idea how DEI works or what it is. lol @You being scared or targetted as a white man. So what about Veterans, Women, people who are disabled? Its not just for colored people . You are insecure fellow.
Yeah, yeah, and once upon a time "gay" meant "happy".
 
i did, and of course you dodge, deflect and deny like most trumper peen pumpers. You also kinda seem like a weak ass, crying about how your rights are being curbed as a white person. Welp, glad you got rid of DEI, now you wont be protected. Not like you needed it.

You sound like an immature child and you absolutely did not explain how DEI is not racist against white men in the slightest bit. All you did was post some copy and pasted description of it without even using a single brain cell to analyze what it means and how it is specifically used to discriminate against people.
 
It’s big enough to shut your mom up, I guess it’d be the same case for you since you are a bottom princess with a ton of attitude.
Wow, a yo momma joke in 2025?

"Bottom princess with a ton of attitude"?? WTF, is that supposed to mean something in your nerd world" Is this really the best you got?
I must have really hit a nerve if I got you this triggered just emotionally spewing the first nonsense that comes to your mind.

{<jordan}

I would normally go easy on insecure little nerds with penis envy issues, but you've proven over and over that you're a disingenuous twat so you can be my new punching bag until I feel you've learned your lesson.
 
If that's what you think, then why support racism against Asians?



No where in there did you explain how DEI is not racist.



Again, no explanation for how DEI is not racist.

Fucking hilarious that you think they're utilizing DEI initiatives to hire white men. You are not on the same planet the rest of us are on.
You're cracking me up here by showing us you're too dumb to understand the answer to the question you're asking. It has been explained to you and you choose to ignore it to respond with this facile crap. Heaven help you and your family because you don't have 2 brain cells to bump together, do you?

Let's give it one more try. The purpose of DEI is to avoid the issue you think is occurring, you tool.

People preferentially hire white men and exclude women and visible minorities of all sorts, whether they are aware of it or not. This initiative is intended to combat preferential hiring based upon that alone, directed toward people with unseen and unconscious bias, because of strong empirical evidence that such preferential bias exists, and that education on the subject could help people avoid it. It helps ensure the most qualified person gets the job instead of the guy who happens to look a lot like your favourite fishing buddy.

There. You got your answer. Now, you can waddle off and come back with more bullshit like the clapping seal you are, or you can say, ah I see that makes sense. Up to you..
 
Last edited:
You're cracking me up here by showing us you're too dumb to understand the answer to the question you're asking. It has been explained to you and you choose to ignore it to respond with this facile crap. Heaven help you and your family because you don't have 2 brain cells to bump together, do you?

Let's give it one more try. The purpose of DEI is to avoid the issue you think is occurring, you tool.

People preferentially hire white men and exclude women and visible minorities of all sorts, whether they are aware of it or not. This initiative is intended to combat preferential hiring based upon that alone, directed toward people with unseen and unconscious bias, because of strong empirical evidence that such preferential bias exists, and that education on the subject could help people avoid it. It helps ensure the most qualified person gets the job instead of the guy who happens to look a lot like your favourite fishing buddy.

There. You got your answer. Now, you can waddle off and come back with more bullshit like the clapping seal you are, or you can say, ah I see that makes sense. Up to you..

Lmao this is an even worse attempt than I expected. To say DEI is here to hire based on merit is laughable. Are you even on the same planet as the rest of us?

If the most qualified person got the job, that would mean Asian and white people would dominate the high paying jobs since they have bachelor degrees at over twice the rate as black people.

DEI exists to ensure they don't dominate the workforce because of their skin color.
 
Last edited:
Anyways I find it so sad that Democrats adopted the progressist social justice agenda. And I am much closer to Democrats than Republicains and most issues… Democrats without the trashy identity politics and a proper, firmer stance on security would make a Trump redundant for 90% of people.

Trump is doing what it takes on woke trash, borders and security. I am not hawkish against Russia so I am also fine with his Russian view. But all the rest he does is complete retardation and the man should have never even gotten a chance to compete.
 
Anyways I find it so sad that Democrats adopted the progressist social justice agenda. And I am much closer to Democrats than Republicains and most issues… Democrats without the trashy identity politics and a proper, firmer stance on security would make a Trump redundant for 90% of people.

Trump is doing what it takes on woke trash, borders and security. I am not hawkish against Russia so I am also fine with his Russian view. But all the rest he does is complete retardation and the man should have never even gotten a chance to compete.
I agree with most of this. I'm even less favorable on Trump though. Everything he's doing now and the enemies he's making are just a spring being compressed, that will eventually pop the other way. This style of leadership just ensures more and more chaos.
 
I’m convinced that if Trump all the sudden went woke the Liberal Democrats would have no choice but to support conservative policy, that is how much they hate the President.


100% they would, and I know exactly the stance they would take, as well.

They'd frame it as "patronising and condescending to minority groups who don't need you to hold their hands through life". Take that to the fucking bank. They only exist to take the opposite stance of the 'right', they don't truly have solid beliefs.
 
What's funny is we had some employees at work today from a large company that I won't name, but everyone knows. They had to pretend like they got rid of their DEI program. They said they had different sections for black people and Asians. They said now they're scaling it back but they're doing it more covertly now so they don't get caught. Basically secretly discriminating against people which is what the liberals think DEI is supposed to be preventing.
 
If they meet the same qualifications then there is no need for DEI.

Hiring based on merit alone ensures that only the most qualified people get the job, and if those happen to be all women, or all people of colour, or all homosexuals, then so be it.

I'm against DEI period, but even if you're for it you should be consistent with it.

Funny enough no one on the left is pushing for DEI in the NBA where a group that's less than 15% of the population makes up over 90% of the league.

Yes my son is white and he needs more representation of whiteys so he has something to strive for, remember "you can't be what you can't see!"
 
100% they would, and I know exactly the stance they would take, as well.

They'd frame it as "patronising and condescending to minority groups who don't need you to hold their hands through life". Take that to the fucking bank. They only exist to take the opposite stance of the 'right', they don't truly have solid beliefs.
Yup, what more proof do you need than their stance on getting involved in foreign wars. This was something the left was always against, until the right was against it. Now all of a sudden Trump attempting to sign a peace treaty and stop the war in Ukraine is considered a far right position.

🤡🌎
 
Back
Top