Opinion Why is "anti DEI" and "anti-woke" a POTUS top priority?

[evergreenrider]

haha
Fair enough.
He hates jews too much I gather?

jesus be damned

He's very, very anti zionist. Christian, jew. Don't matter to Duke.

 

[Sinister]

@SKYNET I cant reply to your reply because its just an edited quote. But yeah, like you didnt argue that Byrd is a false equivalency. My argument wasnt that Democrats have never had, and dont still have racists among them. It's that the Byrd example is stupid because that's literally probably the most famous former racist who actually did redeem his previous actions. If rightists want to make the argument that Democrats are as racist as Trump is, or David Duke is, they can at least find someone relevant.

 

[SKYNET]

@SKYNET I cant reply to your reply because its just an edited quote. But yeah, like you didnt argue that Byrd is a false equivalency. My argument wasnt that Democrats have never had, and dont still have racists among them. It's that the Byrd example is stupid because that's literally probably the most famous former racist who actually did redeem his previous actions. If rightists want to make the argument that Democrats are as racist as Trump is, or David Duke is, they can at least find someone relevant.

Byrd is just like any other racist that found a home with the Dems, you can't defend but you could deflect. Typical boring stuff here with the lesser evil debate, the overarching point here is how pitiful and pathetic the hypocrites on the left are. History wasn't on your side rolling out the red carpet for Byrd and Joe Bidens other ex-KKK buddies and modern history won't look favorably for you sleuths when it comes to character judgment as well.

 

[MacGregor]

First time I heard of this.

 

[Confucamus]

There is absolutely systemic empirical evidence of privileges regarding home loan interest rates, regarding sentencing when convicted of the same crimes, arrest rates for the same crimes, employment data, and now with these stupid school voucher initiatives, schools are actively rejecting minority children at higher rates.

I'm sure this data ignores the different laws and guidelines of all 50 states, am I wrong? Does it factor in repeat offenders? Because judges often use that as justification for longer sentences. Does that data also take into account that black Americans account for 50% of the crime in the country, despite only making up 13% of the population?

No, according to you no one should merely be able to hire whoever they want. According to you they MUST be obligated to hire the best. That's what a merit-based system would necessitate. So if someone has a more qualified candidate who is black, and a less qualified one that is white...then they are absolutely just discriminating against the black candidate.

Well, yeah I completely agree. Nobody's race should be considered when evaluating the resume of a potential hire.

The truth of the matter is that nepotism, not merit, is the best indicator of success...and also preserves racial biases. Data has born out time and time again that people hire people they know and like, or their own relatives, regardless of who is qualified or not. So merit, as an argument against DEI, is just nonsense people say to preserve their own racial biases.

I don't doubt that happens, but that is people who are abusing their positions. That's not how it's supposed to be. If a black person favors black applicants over white, regardless of accomplishments, that is wrong. DEI just put a pretty face on racism. The country needs to move past discriminatory practices like this and thankfully it is moving on from DEI.

 

[RoastBeast]

If anyone gets railed by DEI, it is Asians….Not white people.

If that's what you think, then why support racism against Asians?

No it's really not, its currently being used as a Racist and sexist weapon yes. Prior, i doubt it effect your every day life.


And i doesnt cause plain crashes and its not a Reason to attack let alone kill a civil rights bill that prevents segregation

No where in there did you explain how DEI is not racist.

No it doesnt. But I'm sure you feel that the inability to not have an all white staff equates to "discrimination against white men." Because that's where you're at with yourself.

If you had half a brain youd realize that it works the other way as well, and in the cases of workplaces where white men are the minority, DEI initiatives would assure their employment.

Again, no explanation for how DEI is not racist.

Fucking hilarious that you think they're utilizing DEI initiatives to hire white men. You are not on the same planet the rest of us are on.

 

[filthybliss]

If that's what you think, then why support racism against Asians?

I’m Asian and I didn’t mention support for DEI. Weird thing to assume.

 

[RoastBeast]

You sounds insanely insecure, you think youre being discriminated against as a white man?

This is the go to answer for racist liberals. How original of you.

Someone spots your racism and your comeback is that the people you're being racist against are insecure.

What a shit person you are, racist.

 

[RoastBeast]

I’m Asian and I didn’t mention support for DEI. Weird thing to assume.

Ok we're good then. Thanks for not being racist.

Also sorry that you're dealing with racism from your fellow liberals.

 

[Koro_11]

It would be if departments were mandated to only hire women or gay people and ethnic minorities. Thats never been the case.

DEI hires have to meet the same qualifications as their male hetero caucasian peers and was brought about to combat systemic discrimination. So you haven’t answered the question how anti-woke and anti DEI benefit everyone.

If they meet the same qualifications then there is no need for DEI.

Hiring based on merit alone ensures that only the most qualified people get the job, and if those happen to be all women, or all people of colour, or all homosexuals, then so be it.

I'm against DEI period, but even if you're for it you should be consistent with it.

Funny enough no one on the left is pushing for DEI in the NBA where a group that's less than 15% of the population makes up over 90% of the league.

 

[GhostZ06]

If that's what you think, then why support racism against Asians?



No where in there did you explain how DEI is not racist.



Again, no explanation for how DEI is not racist.

Fucking hilarious that you think they're utilizing DEI initiatives to hire white men. You are not on the same planet the rest of us are on.

Diversity refers to the presence of variety within the organizational workforce in characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, veteran status, or religion


it sounds to me you have no idea how DEI works or what it is. lol @You being scared or targetted as a white man. So what about Veterans, Women, people who are disabled? Its not just for colored people . You are insecure fellow.

 

[Mr Holmes]

@SKYNET I cant reply to your reply because its just an edited quote. But yeah, like you didnt argue that Byrd is a false equivalency. My argument wasnt that Democrats have never had, and dont still have racists among them. It's that the Byrd example is stupid because that's literally probably the most famous former racist who actually did redeem his previous actions. If rightists want to make the argument that Democrats are as racist as Trump is, or David Duke is, they can at least find someone relevant.

"Its (D)ifferent"

 

[RoastBeast]

Diversity refers to the presence of variety within the organizational workforce in characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, age, culture, class, veteran status, or religion


it sounds to me you have no idea how DEI works or what it is. lol @You being scared or targetted as a white man. So what about Veterans, Women, people who are disabled? Its not just for colored people . You are insecure fellow.

You have still yet to justify how DEI is not racist and/or sexist in any way whatsoever. All you're doing is the old 'oh does the poor white man feel threatened?' routine.

Either answer the original question or exit the chat because you're providing absolutely no substance and completely dancing around the question. Logically you cannot implement DEI without discriminating against innocent people. Either refute that or admit that you're racist against those whom you've justified your racism for.